|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
So Marty and the Delorean are the only things that don't change.
__________________
lol
l /\ Last edited by JarodRussell; December 26 2012 at 07:58 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
Life of Pi is the most pleasant film I've ever not cared at all for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
There is no Earth 2 or 3, etc. History is rewritten. That is the theme of the whole Trilogy. There is not another Marty McFly at the beginning of the movie at the Twin Pines. Its not the theory of traveling to a parallel universe. Or how would pictures from the future change? How would the Twin Pines Mall become the Lone Pines Mall? |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
Admiral
Location: Making closing arguments with Jack McCoy & Michael Cutter
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
Kegg: "You're a Trekkie. The capacity to quibble over the minutiae of space opera films is your birthright." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
To boldly go...
Location: Kansas City
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
(This is also one of the beautiful things about Biff and the almanac, as he gets richer and his power has its own impacts on things any alterations he may make to the world as a result of his wealth, and thus could impact sporting events, the almanac will change to reflect this as well. The almanac will always be useful, unless Biff ever made a change that will impact the existence of it.) But there IS a problem with the end of Back to the Future, the original movie, with as we're shown how time travel works. We know from observation of the movies that there's no such thing as the "predestination paradox." The past CAN be changed, as well as the future. We're shown evidence that the 1985 Marty arrives in at the end of the first movie is now different from the 1985 he left. (The Lone Pine Mall sign.) This means that the Marty we see leave this 1985 doesn't have to leave in order for the changes to take place. They've already happened. They're not dependent on HIM. They're dependent on "our" Marty and cannot be altered. Theoretically that Marty can travel back in time to witness the new story of how his parents met and fell and love. Which at the end of the movie he does. Which means he SHOULD travel back to 1955 and crash into himself. "But, Trekker!", you say, "that's the point! He's supposed to go back there and make the changes!" No, no he's not. Again, all because of how we're shown how time travel works in the movies. The changes are dependent on our primary Marty, the one we follow throughout the trilogy. Not that Marty. So, yes, there is a "second" Marty McFly somewhere and he never returns. We can probably assume, I guess, that the timeline is able to "correct" itself in order to avoid universe-ending paradoxes. Meaning when the "real" Marty of the altered 1985 leaves the "present" he just vanishes, consumed by time. Possibly displaced by instantly appearing at the exact same time and place as "our" Marty. Since they can't appear at the exact same time one gets pushed out of the way into lord knows where and when. Which might make for an interesting story, actually. So we have "our" Marty who we see arrive on the Twin Pines Ranch in 1955 and makes the changes he does, at that exact same instant a point in space we have the end of the movie Marty arriving at the ranch in 1955. They both can't appear at the very same time and place so one simply gets displaced. (I'm operating under the theory there has to be a "connection" between two time periods in order for time machines to work. Whether cosmic-strings or some other crazy thing, there needs to be something the time machine uses to travel between points in time.) The time machine in the displacement suffers irreparable damage and arrives at some greatly distant time in the past (since that was the "direction" it was traveling.) And because we have to be SURE that things will unfold the way they "should" it's the better-off Marty that is displaced. So "our" Marty goes back thinking his father is a schmuck and knows the original story of how his parents met. The actual Marty of the altered-1985 would have heard a different story and may not have been as motivated to make the changes he needs to believing it's someone else who'll take care of, even more so considering his parents seemed to credit Biff with their meeting. (Oh, Biff, and his near-rape! Ha-ha!) What time should he arrive in? What adventures would he have and deal with stuck in a time-period without Doc to repair the DeLorean.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Commodore
Location: California
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
That being said, one of the things that I was unable to rectify is how Marty (and Jennifer) are able to meet their future selves in 2015. By traveling into the future, they no longer exist in 1985, and therefore do not grow old to exist in 2015. You can't visit your future self, but you can visit your past self. I don't accept the answer that the Starlog article posits, because of the fact that I don't agree with how he thinks alternate versions of Marty and Jennifer pop up to replace the ones that travel to the future. He also makes a lot of assumptions about the motives of Marty II.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983 |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
As Captain Janeway said once, time travel gives her (and us) headaches. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Commodore
Location: California
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
In either event, I still maintain that going to the future effectively fast forwards time, and you don't exist in the interim. (i.e., if I freeze myself and wake up in the year 3000, everyone would think I just disappeared for 1000 years.) I also believe that I could go back to the past and kill my past self (or my grandpa) and I would continue to exist, since I come from a place where my past self (or my grandpa) did not get killed by a time travelling me. If I were somehow able to then return to my own time and universe, it would be like I didn't exist (a la It's a Wonderful Life). The BTTF movies don't follow this logic, because Marty starts to disappear when it becomes likely that his parents don't get married. One other complaint is that the life that Marty assumes when he goes to the new and improved 1985 (the one with a truck and successful parents and Biff is a mechanic), he's assuming the life of some other alternate Marty, one whom he knows nothing about. His family and friends would think its odd that he doesn't have the same knowledge and experiences as the alternate Marty. He'd show up to school the next day, and probably be in a whole bunch of different classes or something. Anyway, like I said. These are my favorite movies. They don't have to make sense for me to enjoy them, and I still watch them all on the regular.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983 |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: 1123 6536 5321
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
Now I've probably seen BTTF over 20 times and have never noticed this, so I got out the blu ray and tried to spot what he's talking about...... jesus you could watch that film a thousand times and never notice that. I *think* there's someone there I guess, for about 2 frames. It's obviously certainly not intentional. |
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
But we, as the audience, always follow the very first Marty who started the predestination "paradox". He got the Delorean from a Doc Brown who never ever met Marty in 1955.
__________________
lol
l /\ |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
To boldly go...
Location: Kansas City
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
Life of Pi is the most pleasant film I've ever not cared at all for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Commodore
Location: California
|
Re: Minor BTTF Part Two question
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983 |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















