|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Ensign
Location: united federation of peanuts
|
possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
I think it's best to pretend those were phasers in "The Cage", and calling them "lasers" was a goof.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
Bjo Trimble said, "The gun was just a little too lethal-looking for Gene's taste and he just didn't like it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Captain
Location: Delta Vega
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the Left Coast
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
__________________
You're not really Drunk until you're speaking fluent Ozzy Osboune
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
I also think the same rule applies to phaser rifles, they're not standard-issue. IMO, they're not any more powerful than phaser pistols, but the larger size enables a larger power pack, so they're more ideal for combat situations in which prolonged use is expected.
__________________
"Shout, shout, let it all out..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
This works with Mitchell evolving into an unprecedented threat, Spock surmised that it warranted use of this new experimental weapon to combat Mitchell. Later, phasers developed into the usual Type I and II models we know. So yeah... my theory is that the early prototype experimental phaser took the form of the rifle we saw. Once it went into production as standard issue, it evolved into the handheld model. We never saw the rifle again because that was an early prototype of the new phaser tech and later phasers were the same weapon only in pistol form. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Admiral
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
__________________
Nerys Myk's Midnight In Never Land A novel of Dark Fantasy @ Amazon.com |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Commodore
Location: Wingsley
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
That seems to be a techno/historical/continuity hangup; if one assumes lasers were the weapons-of-choice in the 2250s, then one has to scratch one's head and explain how/when phasers replaced lasers. But if TOS phasers and ENT phase pistols/canons are all different rungs on the particle beam evolutionary ladder anyway, then it would seem that Berman & Company (unwittingly?) left their mark on TOS history, and it would seem that Pike and company were actually using some kind of particle beam weaponry that was simply referred to as "laser" as a kind of slang. (It should be noted that "laser" is, after all, an acronym; IIRC, "laser" stands for Light Amplification through Stimulated Emission of Radiation, or something like that... I seem to recall Sternbach & Okuda referring to "phaser" as slang for "phased ray emitter" in literature over 20 years ago.)
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..." -- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Commander
Location: State of Mind
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
I still sometimes say I am taping something on Tv when I mean dvr
__________________
Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans: John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: possible reason we never seen the phaser rifle after w.n.m.h.g.b.
*excepting the vanishing/here again abilities like wide beam and insanely high power settings. But just like we're supposed to pretend "The Cage" weapons were phasers, in DS9's "The Seige of AR-558" we're supposed to pretend wide beam and building-destroying settings don't exist.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















