RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,226
Posts: 5,405,656
Members: 24,764
Currently online: 505
Newest member: beakel001

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

View Poll Results: Are you excited for Jack's big screen debut
yes 5 17.24%
no 17 58.62%
maybe so 7 24.14%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 12 2012, 08:43 PM   #31
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Pingfah wrote: View Post
I don't care if the film is like the books or not, it's unimportant. I only care if they make a good movie.
The Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum don't follow the books at all, and no one on message boards ever complain.

Even if you don't like Cruise as Reacher, he's not gonna play the part for 17 movies. If it's successful, there will be more movies and more actors in the role.

If it's not successful, several years down the road Rob Cohen might make a Reacher movie with Tyler Perry.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 13 2012, 12:03 AM   #32
Davros
Fleet Admiral
 
Davros's Avatar
 
Location: Kaled bunker, Skaro
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I'll wait till it's on cable or something similar.
__________________
"Taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society," -Oliver Wendell Holmes
Davros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 14 2012, 02:33 PM   #33
the G-man
Commodore
 
the G-man's Avatar
 
Location: to your immediate right
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I never heard of the books until the movie was announced. It looks like an entertaining action flick. I might go.
the G-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 14 2012, 02:48 PM   #34
Rhaven
Captain
 
Rhaven's Avatar
 
Location: Rhaven in Boston
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

While Cruise can act, I just don't see him as Reacher.
I'll wait for the movie to go to DVD and even then, meh.
__________________
I'm not a geek, I'm an aficionado.
Rhaven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 15 2012, 12:55 PM   #35
ElimParra
Fleet Admiral
 
ElimParra's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Not really. Seen the previews. Maybe wait for DVD, but won't be rushing out to see it.
ElimParra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18 2012, 05:23 AM   #36
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Jack Reacher

My Grade: B+

--------------------

For what it is worth I am not familiar with the source material for this character/movie nor am I fan of Tom Cruise, but I honestly think he was pretty good in this movie.

Cruise plays Jack Reacher a former army MP who is now a roguish man living off the grid roaming around the country, seemingly taking on tasks and jobs at his own whim. He's sort of like if you mixed Jack Bauer, Sherlock Holmes, James Bond and the cast of the A-Team together in a blender, forgot about it for a while and it fermented a bit and some Tom Cruise got in.

Fortunately for us Tom Cruise is not playing his usual "smirking jackass" trope in this movie and actually turns in a pretty hard-core performance.

The movie opens with a scene that sort of chilling and unsettling in the wake of recent events, where a sniper kills five seemingly random people from a parking ramp near PNC Stadium in Pittsburgh. After a remarkably swift investigation the DA the chief detective have found the man they believe to be the sniper, James Barr. He's given the option of pleading guilty where he'll get life in prison or going to trial where he'll like lose to an unbeatable DA with a fancy for the death penalty. He simply asks for the men to find Jack Reacher before being beaten into a coma enroute back to prison.

The investigator and DA are confused on who Reacher is until he literally walks right into their office, inquisitive about Barr who was a former sniper in [a middle-eastern war] he never "got his kill." Being the type who join the army in order to kill and get away with it he killed a handful of men on the last day of his tour. A combination of the men having actually been criminals and government cover-up got him his freedom when he left the service, Jack vowed to get Barr should he ever slip-up again. Now it seems he has.

Reacher meets with the attorney representing Barr in his defense (ummm.... She took a court appointment? The Public Defender's office was booked? I dunno) finding herself not only going against her father (the DA) in court but with a case she cannot win. She just hope to at least find grounds to avoid the DP. Reacher is reluctant at first but eventually comes around to helping her out but as their investigation wears on it seems that maybe Barr was set-up, a pawn in a larger conspiracy.

The movie has plenty of good action scenes in it and Tom Cruise is actually pretty likable in the role of our infalliable action hero. Again, I'm not sure how the character is portrayed int he books but here I think Tom Cruise did a good job.

If there's one flaw in the movie it's that I don't know what the stakes in it are for me as the viewer. Yes, once our characters get in over their heads their own lives and reputations become at risk but for most of the movie they're working to prove the evidence of an innocent man whom we never get to meet or identify with. It doesn't matter to me that the character might be innocent because I don't know him enough TO care.

That aside there's a lot of good, fun, action movie moments in this movie and a great part played by Robert Duvall as the estate-keeper of Reacher's home Skyfall... (or something.) Most of the other secondary characters (including Rosamund Pike as Helen the defense's counsel) are just that: Secondary. They're there pretty much to give Reacher someone to talk to and look like a badass against. Which, really, Tom Cruise sort of pulls off here.

Can't say how fans of the book(s) will take the movie, but I enjoyed it.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18 2012, 02:39 PM   #37
Lonemagpie
Writer
 
Lonemagpie's Avatar
 
Location: Yorkshire
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

^ sounds like it should be OK, then, plot/drama/action-wise at least
__________________
"I got two modes with people- Bite, and Avoid"
Reading: Wolfsangel (MD Lachlan)

Blog- http://lonemagpie.livejournal.com
Lonemagpie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 10:23 PM   #38
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Aragorn wrote: View Post
Pingfah wrote: View Post
I don't care if the film is like the books or not, it's unimportant. I only care if they make a good movie.
The Bourne Supremacy and Bourne Ultimatum don't follow the books at all, and no one on message boards ever complain.

Even if you don't like Cruise as Reacher, he's not gonna play the part for 17 movies. If it's successful, there will be more movies and more actors in the role.

If it's not successful, several years down the road Rob Cohen might make a Reacher movie with Tyler Perry.
Both of you are right. It's an adaptation, it can't be exactly the same and the existence of this movie doesn't mean that the books stop existing and being good.

But as a big fan of the novels, despite still wanting to see this and expecting it to be a good movie, I can't help but be disappointed that they have cast someone so totally and utterly unlike the guy in the novels in every way. It's not just height, it's looks, demeanour, attitude and personality. I do like Cruise as a leading man and I expect him to bring something interesting to this role - I just wish he'd kept it for another character!

As regards Bourne, I suppose the difference is that the books were nearly 30 years old by the time the movies were made. They were very much set in the 1970s, as I recall and would have been period pieces had they been adopted for the big screen by Damon and co. And by and large, period set action movies don't succeed. Not to mention that most people would have forgotten the original novels.

OTOH, the Reacher novels are fairly recent and for the most part won't need a lot of updating (indeed, One Shot, which this movie is based on) was written in 2005 and there have been one a year ever since.

But hey, here's hoping it's a good movie at least.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:16 PM   #39
Garak
Mr Garak. Today My Name is Mr Garak
 
Garak's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

People who write off Tom Cruise movies without seeing them are some of the most foolish people this planet has to offer.
__________________
'Just be yourself' is good advice to probably 5% of people.
Garak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:59 PM   #40
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Santa's Balls wrote: View Post
People who write off Tom Cruise movies without seeing them are some of the most foolish people this planet has to offer.
No, I don't agree. It IS possible to not like an actor and as a consequence of that avoid going to see his movies.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 01:33 AM   #41
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gotham
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

I had no idea Chris McQuarrie wrote and directed this. He previously worked on the script for Bryan Singer's "Valkyrie" that starred Cruise so there's a little history between the two. I am a little more interested in this than I was before because of this. Plus the TV spots have been pretty decent.
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 01:50 AM   #42
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

It really is an enjoyable movie. I recommend it.
__________________
Out of hope.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 04:16 PM   #43
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

^Oh, and thanks for your helpful review Trekker
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 04:58 PM   #44
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

This strikes me as an odd movie in that looks like the sort of paperback pulp thriller that hits shelves all the time, but rarely really crosses over to movie screens. Maybe it's that TV utterly dominates the anthology book style of various crimes being solved by lightly drawn recurring characters?

This definitely isn't a ticket purchase for me, and probably not a Netflix/Rebox, either. Per Trekker's review, it just doesn't sound too interesting.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 05:01 PM   #45
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Jack Reacher yes,no, maybe so

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
^Oh, and thanks for your helpful review Trekker
Mark this day in your calendars.

Finally someone gets bitched at because he likes a film without going into details.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.