|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#136 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
Maybe after a couple more successful movies we can start thinking about live action.
__________________
www.youtube.com/user/SalvorSeldon |
|
|
|
|
#137 | |
|
Shit Supreme
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
Any network worth bragging about being on cancels shows after half a season if a sereis isn't a bonafide hit. The network with the rights to Star Trek, CBS, isn't going to waste an hour a week because they hold the honor of having the #1 show, #1 new show, #1 comedy...blah blah blah. They know what works and they have little patience for something that doesn't. If Seinfield or Cheers or Friends or really any TV show you remember from the past 30 years were to premiere today, it would be yanked off the air by the end of it's first season for not performing. The suits simply don't believe in waiting. They're all looking for the next American Idol, or some show who's cost is a fraction of the revinue. Trek, by it's nature...it's an expensive show. Unless you'd be willing to watch Syfy movie of the week effects. God help the endless nerdrage threads in here if that were to happen. So, we're stuck with this. As much as all of us would gladly welcome a new series with open arms...we'd all get tired of it because modern TV isn't pumping out TOS or TNG. It's pumping out Enterprise. It's not going to ever pump out TOS or TNG again. The networks owe us nothing and they're only in it for money. How to they make money? By getting good add buys. How do they get those? Buy appealing to the widest audience possible in the shortest amount of time. Star Trek doesn't fit that model.
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY! |
|
|
|
|
|
#138 |
|
Awesome
Location: Wherever life takes me
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
Now, how many other franchises in the history of TV and movies have anywhere near that amount of stuff? Plenty of very popular shows never come back. I'm not saying you have to be happy with the direction modern Trek is taking, but you should feel lucky that Trek didn't end forever back in the 60s, because it very easily could have. |
|
|
|
|
#139 |
|
Shit Supreme
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
Laid end to end, it spans 28 television seasons. If you watched The Cage this week, and watched one new episode a week, you would watch These Are The Voyages... the week of June 21, 2026. If you conceived a child after watching The Cage, they would be in 8th grade when you ended the tradition. There have been more movies with Star Trek in the title than any other franchise besides Friday the 13th (12) or James Bond (23). In May, Star Trek will be tied for 2nd. If it were one series it would be the most successful television series in American history beating Gunsmoke by almost 70 episodes. I don't count WWE Raw because it's shit.
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY! |
|
|
|
|
#140 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion) The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#141 | |
|
Commander
Location: South Texas
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
Of course I don't want to eat something called a spittle pod. Go away.
-Montgomery Scott- |
|
|
|
|
|
#142 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#143 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
If I get an urge to watch Trek between new movies I own more than enough of it on various home formats to keep me busy for a long time.
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#144 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Oxford, PA
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#145 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
|
#146 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Oxford, PA
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#147 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: What Took So Long...why we're only getting a new movie now...
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.



















