|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Admiral
Location: Running with the Badgers
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
__________________
Now I can breathe and I feel grace rush over me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
If a malfunction is ruled out, then it looks like the scuttling charges were optimized to go gently on the warp drive, for whatever reason. Or perhaps the charges malfunctioned the other way? Perhaps Kirk only wanted to blow up the areas with Klingon boarders, so that he could later return to the wreck and fly it back to Earth, but something went wrong, the entire saucer blew and the fell from orbit. Kirk's "What have I done?" takes a new meaning here... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Llandudno
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
On the other hand, if Kirk only meant to kill (or incapacitate) the Klingon borders, wouldn't making use of the intruder alert systems be a sensible route to pursue? Knockout gas, phasers on wide beam, even just some locked doors all seem less drastic than resorting to dynamite!!! |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: West Hollywood, Calif., USA
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
None of it makes too much sense, but perhaps auto-destruct and intruder containment were some of the systems damaged in the BoP attack. Lots of other things already went gaflooey, and Kirk & Co. no longer had any hope of running the ship themselves. So the only hope was destroying the bridge and (more far more importantly) computer core, and letting the atmosphere do the rest of the work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
__________________
"Shout, shout, let it all out..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
Between the limited repairs left from TWOK and the hit from the Bird of Prey, the damage may have affected the destruct system. What we saw in TSFS may be a self-destruct mishap, where certain scuttling charges didn't go off as designed or detonated prematurely out of sequence or whatever else you can think of. A self-destruct that didn't go as designed. Maybe what we saw in TSFS was an unplanned destruct scenario, something between "maximum annihilation" self-destruct and "scuttle the vessel safely" self-destruct. I'm guessing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
Destroying the Klingon ship by conventional means was obviously not possible. Boarding would have presented quite a risk, too: Kirk had no real idea of what sort of opposition he would face, but he did know he'd have to drag the less than combat-capable McCoy (and Scotty) along for the fight. Trying to blow up both ships would have been a pretty clever move, and would imply that the scuttling did not go quite as planned since Kruge managed to escape. Just blowing up the boarding party helped already, though - but escaping from the doomed Enterprise was a necessary move no matter what, so stun gas or containment fields would not have been viable options, as they would not have diminished the Klingon fighting strength and ability to hunt down Kirk's party in any way. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: England's green and pleasant land.
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
If the antimatter is simply released into space when the pods are destroyed, or magnetic containment loses power, it would need to come into contact with matching particles of matter to release energy. Whenever antimatter has been created in a lab it has lasted only a tiny fraction of a second, in our universe it isn't very stable - so when containment goes maybe it simply disappears, unless, like Scotty, you are going to release the whole lot in one go into the reaction chamber, creating a whacking great reaction that would wipe out everything within a few thousand miles.
__________________
I believe in a better world, so I love Star Trek. I have to live in this one, so I love Battlestar Galactica. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
|
Re: Did the Auto-destruct partially malfunction in TSFS?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















