RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,168
Posts: 5,435,173
Members: 24,939
Currently online: 478
Newest member: katlynwomack

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Stargate

Stargate Sir, we can't call it the Enterprise forum.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old December 14 2012, 10:12 PM   #496
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Spam away!! And I'm pretty sure I have seen that

And go ahead and drag the discussion back to season 4 any time. Are you enjoying it? I think more highly of the series every season!

(Someone one will now solemnly tell me certain seasons suck LOL)
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
Old December 14 2012, 10:40 PM   #497
lurok
Commodore
 
lurok's Avatar
 
Location: Lost in the EU expanse with a nice cup of tea
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

I'm definitely enjoying more second time around. Even Urgo, which I was a bit meh about first time. I love all the little references, especially the Oz ones. And I'm still waiting for an episode with a really bad guest star. Vancouver must have the best faces around And it was fun seeing the Tollin (?) capital again after rewatching BSG.
lurok is offline  
Old December 15 2012, 02:40 AM   #498
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

jinglebellrok wrote: View Post
And it was fun seeing the Tollin (?) capital again after rewatching BSG.
I think that location is actually a university in Vancouver and a lot of sci-fi shows film there. Understandable, I guess. It really does look like a futuristic/alien city.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline  
Old December 15 2012, 05:00 AM   #499
DWF
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

teacake wrote: View Post
Fallout:Jonas returns looking like something out of Logan's Run. Points for interesting fashion with the Langarans we see. Great ep, nice surprise and good drama. Kind of confused by the whole "an explosion caused this problem, we need another explosion to fix it" deal but whatever

I loved it when the Goa'uld descends into the belly of the earth wearing only a singlet and sandals:
Fallout is proof that SG1 might've worked better as an emsemble show. It showed us what could've happened if Jonas had not left the series and I thought it worked out rather well. The ep. was also written by Corin Nemic.
__________________
The greatest science fiction series of all time is
Doctor Who! And I'll take you all on, one-by-one
or all in a bunch to back it up!"
--- Harlan Ellison, from his introduction
to the PINNACLE series of Doctor Who books
DWF is offline  
Old December 15 2012, 12:18 PM   #500
Rowan Sjet
Commodore
 
Rowan Sjet's Avatar
 
Location: Away!
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

^ Funny that when the actors write an episode, their characters usually seem to get a romance.
__________________
And the sign said, "Long haired freaky people need not apply..."
Rowan Sjet is offline  
Old December 15 2012, 06:29 PM   #501
DrunkUncle
Ensign
 
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

teacake wrote: View Post
Fallout:Jonas returns looking like something out of Logan's Run. Points for interesting fashion with the Langarans we see. Great ep, nice surprise and good drama. Kind of confused by the whole "an explosion caused this problem, we need another explosion to fix it" deal but whatever
There's one weird thing about that episode and it's nice that Joseph Mallozzi recognized that too.

"It was a lot of fun although one element in the story didn't quite pan out -- specifically, Jonas Quinn's love interest, a fellow Langaran named Kianna. On the day the first dailies came in, we were horrified to discover that both actors had unnervingly similar hairstyles that, as a result, made them look like they were related. Which, in turn, made some of the romantic scenes a little ... weird?"
DrunkUncle is offline  
Old December 15 2012, 11:59 PM   #502
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Haha, I just put it down to that 70's sci fi look where everyone looks the same. The rest of the Langarens were diverse though so that excuse doesn't really work.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
Old December 17 2012, 12:24 PM   #503
lurok
Commodore
 
lurok's Avatar
 
Location: Lost in the EU expanse with a nice cup of tea
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Sorry to backtrack again, but just watched that clunky Rene/alien Nazis episode and thought it odd writers missed a chance to throw in obvious historical parallel (US utilising Nazi science to advance space tech). Oh well. Also had crazy thought where wondered if anyone had done Trek/Stargate crossovers? It feels like you could use secret tech they acquire as in-universe rationale for why Trek has ships when we clearly won't
lurok is offline  
Old December 17 2012, 12:31 PM   #504
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Death Knell: This was a somewhat choppy episode. Carter fleeing the Robo-Goa'uld alternating with Tok'ra politics. Everything about the Tok'ra is a win for me, their isolationist past, their vulnerability because of declining numbers, their almost cult like group. Let's hope "death knell" doesn't refer to seeing a whole lot less of them.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
Old December 17 2012, 01:23 PM   #505
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Heroes Part 1: It's Artie! And at one point he pauses in his list of what Daniel Jackson does and says "artifacts"

I really liked this red haired guy. He's cute and engaging and excitable. Hopefully does not die in part two.



And we got..

O'Neill: "I hope shots of my ass serve you well."
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
Old December 17 2012, 03:33 PM   #506
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Walter explaining the scope of his job was the highlight of that episode for me.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline  
Old December 18 2012, 12:03 AM   #507
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

jinglebellrok wrote: View Post
Sorry to backtrack again, but just watched that clunky Rene/alien Nazis episode and thought it odd writers missed a chance to throw in obvious historical parallel (US utilising Nazi science to advance space tech). Oh well. Also had crazy thought where wondered if anyone had done Trek/Stargate crossovers? It feels like you could use secret tech they acquire as in-universe rationale for why Trek has ships when we clearly won't
Rodney on the Enterprise? WIN!!!!

And yes to Walter's job explanation,
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
Old December 18 2012, 12:59 PM   #508
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

Heroes Part Two:












VALE the beautiful Doctor Janet Frasier.

WHY did they have to kill her off like that

A stunning woman who I always enjoyed looking at. I will miss her very much.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne

Last edited by teacock; December 18 2012 at 01:54 PM.
teacock is offline  
Old December 18 2012, 01:41 PM   #509
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

teacake wrote: View Post
Heroes Part Two:


VALE the beautiful Doctor Janet Frasier.

WHY did they have to killer off like that

A stunning woman who I always enjoyed looking at. I will miss her very much.
Yea, it was tough holding back the tears and not saying anything when you declared your concern for the red head boy making it through Part 2 alive
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline  
Old December 18 2012, 01:53 PM   #510
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: teacake does Stargate: punch it

And I would like to thank everyone posting in this thread for never having spoiled it, I was quite shocked. I got teary when Wells (?) named his infant daughter Janet.

This is very sad. Did the actor want to leave? She was really a delight and quite slashy with Carter a lot of the time.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.