|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#46 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: Starship water landing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Commander
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Starship water landing
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Starship water landing
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
Pike was supposed to use the brand-new NCC-1701 as the Fleet's "newest flagship". What does a flagship do? Is Kirk scheduled for promotion tours, or task force coordination missions, or just run-of-the-mill exploration and defense but with panache? Is his mission different from Pike's even though the ship is the same? In TOS, much of the allure came from us watching a group of professionals who knew their job, their hardware and their colleagues well enough, even though their working environment and job challenges were beyond bizarre. In nuTrek, Kirk isn't a seasoned veteran, but rides on intuition and general superheroity. It probably doesn't matter much what sort of a ship he is given, then. If Starfleet feels NCC-1701 needs repairs, it could decommission her for those, send Kirk out in a shuttlecraft, and expect universe-saving heroics anyway. OTOH, Starfleet would probably also feel Kirk can triumph in a ship that hasn't been properly repaired - or in a ship that has undergone untested modifications. I doubt the actual specs or status of the new NCC-1701 will feature in any way in Kirk's quest to defeat the Cumberbatch character... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: West Hollywood, Calif., USA
|
Re: Starship water landing
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
No reason to think the nuship wasn't built specifically for flagship action. Indeed, the fancy bridge might specifically be designed for such things, with plenty of seeming "extra" stations in comparison with what we have seen in the TV shows and the other movies. Whether she gets used as such, remains to be seen. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
Like a car
__________________
www.youtube.com/user/SalvorSeldon |
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Admiral
Location: I said out, dammit!
|
Re: Starship water landing
__________________
My kitbashes: http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbash/trekpage.html My Kitbash Wallpapers: http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...allpapers.html My kitbash calendar: http://inpayne.com/calendar/kbcalendar2013.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
Ditto for ST2. In the real world, a rusty old training barge can easily be a flagship, as can a humble destroyer if the admiral in question thinks he needs to be in the thick of things and can't afford to stay back on a clumsy battleship. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: West Hollywood, Calif., USA
|
Re: Starship water landing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
Commodore Mendez didn't really take charge of the ship in "The Menagerie". But Commodore Decker did, in "The Doomsday Machine". Neither of these characters would have had the physical flag packed, of course. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Lieutenant
|
Re: Starship water landing
Maybe one of them belongs to commodore Mendez? Fabricated just for the occasion.
__________________
"God runs electromagnetics by wave theory on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and the Devil runs them by quantum theory on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday." -Sir William Bragg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Admiral
Location: I said out, dammit!
|
Re: Starship water landing
__________________
My kitbashes: http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbash/trekpage.html My Kitbash Wallpapers: http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...allpapers.html My kitbash calendar: http://inpayne.com/calendar/kbcalendar2013.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Starship water landing
The next apply only to evidence we are aware of, even though it is always possible that there would have been events that were never televised, filmed, or even alluded to in canon. 1) Did anybody call the ship a flagship of any sort? 2) Did anybody call the ship "the" flagship as opposed to "a" flagship? 3) Did we learn what the ship was flagship to? 4) Was the ship a flagship at any point, in the sense of flying the flag of a flag officer? 5) Was the ship a flagship at any point, in the sense of commanding a large task force? 6) Was the ship a flagship at any point, in the sense of being a symbolic showpiece vessel? Kirk's TOS ship: no, no, no, yes, no, unknown/unlikely Kirk's refitted ship: no, no, no, yes, no, unknown/unlikely The E-A: no, no, no, no, no, unknown but possible considering TUC The E-B: no, no, no, no, no, unknown but very likely considering GEN The E-C: no, no, no, no, no, unknown but somewhat possible considering relative size The E-D: yes, yes, yes (of the Federation), yes, yes, yes The E-E: no, no, no, no, yes, unknown but possible nuKirk's nuship: yes, no, no (beyond Pike's "our"), no, perhaps (at departure to Vulcan, although there's no dialogue to that end), unknown but likely considering modernity etc. So, out of the lot only the nuship might be "The flagship of Starfleet", unless one of the others briefly acquired that status off screen and we were never told. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















