2nd Ship in the Into Darkness Trailer

[Vektor]

The ship in the teaser doesn't even look like the NX-01. Proportions are wrong, nacelles are differently shaped, support pylons taper in the wrong direction and have that funky bend in them, no outriggers on top of the primary hull, etc, etc.

No reason to think it's anything other than some random new class of ship designed for this movie, just as they did with several never before seen classes in the last one.

[YARN]

Vektor wrote:

---

The ship in the teaser doesn't even look like the NX-01. Proportions are wrong, nacelles are differently shaped, support pylons taper in the wrong direction and have that funky bend in them, no outriggers on top of the primary hull, etc, etc.

No reason to think it's anything other than some random new class of ship designed for this movie, just as they did with several never before seen classes in the last one.

Even so, it's a promising looking shadow. It has a much wider stance than the nu-1701 and the nacelles don't look childishly "ample." Dare to dream of an eventual refit in the nu-Universe?

Old-Spock is there, so he could certainly pass along some ship design advances. He already gave up the formula for transwarp beaming.

[WinstonSmith]

Also, I would imagine if it were the NX (which it quite clearly isn't, but anyway, besides the point) they would have to pay royalties to someone (Doug Drexler, or maybe just to CBS I guess) to use it?

[B.J.]

Nah, it's characters they have to pay royalties on, not ship designs.

[Shawnster]

Vektor wrote:

---

The ship in the teaser doesn't even look like the NX-01. Proportions are wrong, nacelles are differently shaped, support pylons taper in the wrong direction and have that funky bend in them, no outriggers on top of the primary hull, etc, etc.

No reason to think it's anything other than some random new class of ship designed for this movie, just as they did with several never before seen classes in the last one.

And this is probably thecorrect answer/supposition

[King Daniel Into Darkness]

It looks like a nuTrek version of the old Akyazi-class fan design to me.

[baxart]

I thought the nacelles looked very Sovereign class.

[Finn]

It looked blue to me....

[Patrickivan]

Here's something I whipped up this morning... I just followed the lines that were obvious...

I had trouble with the spoiler option so I just provided the link to my wordpress... Sorry...

http://patrickivan.wordpress.com/201...kness/numovie/

[erifah]

YARN wrote:

---

The 2nd ship in the trailer (going into the water) does not look like the nu-Trek Enterprise.

Any guesses as to what ship that one is?

Don't know, don't care.

It's all hot starship porn to ME, and I'm salivating at all the new eyecandy that's likely in store for us, no matter what they call them!

[Galileo7]

baxart wrote:

---

I thought the nacelles looked very Sovereign class.

Agree.

[Sarvek]

Hot Wheels is coming out with the second ship for the next Star Trek movie, but it has not been revealed what that ship is or what it will look like.

[Starship]

maybe, it´s just the equivallent to 1701-A or, by other words, just a the old lady with a few updates and steroids.

[Ian Keldon]

B.J. wrote:

---

Nah, it's characters they have to pay royalties on, not ship designs.

Yeah, the FX guys don't get residuals...

[Cataclysmus]

Looking at some of the screencaps, a thought occured: The crashing ship doesn't even have to be right-side up. Looking at some of the screen caps, I was wondering if this is what an Akira-variant would look like upside down.

-