RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 127,173
Posts: 4,806,718
Members: 22,877
Currently online: 304
Newest member: JROTCcadetMajor

TrekToday headlines

Trek Nation Special Edition DVD
By: T'Bonz on Jun 17

Two New Bye Bye Robot Trek Posters
By: T'Bonz on Jun 17

Star Trek Into Darkness Box Office
By: T'Bonz on Jun 17

Retro Review: Shattered Mirror
By: Michelle on Jun 15

September Star Trek IDW Publishing Releases
By: T'Bonz on Jun 14

Restored Shuttle Galileo To Land In Texas
By: T'Bonz on Jun 14

USS Enterprise To Sail Again
By: T'Bonz on Jun 14

Reading Rainbow Celebrates Thirty Years
By: T'Bonz on Jun 14

Two Shatner Bobbleheads And Lunchboxes
By: T'Bonz on Jun 13

Takei Ghostwriter: Sorry!
By: T'Bonz on Jun 13


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Enterprise

Enterprise The final frontier has a new beginning in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 28 2012, 07:13 AM   #31
Melakon
Commodore
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

I never said they were good.
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2012, 09:10 PM   #32
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Starfleet Command, The City that Knows How
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

M wrote: View Post
Certainly sounds like a valid idea, though, don't you think? Well, it certainly would have been better than nothing.
Not better than no TCW at all, it ain't.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2012, 09:46 PM   #33
E-DUB
Commander
 
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

Captain Robau was future guy..................and he didn't need a time machine.
E-DUB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28 2012, 10:30 PM   #34
st.barthgirl
Lieutenant
 
Location: I Believe in Dog
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

Funny~ i always thought 'future guy' was a woman.

From watching the series- not because of casting or novels...
st.barthgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 12:15 AM   #35
Guy Gardener
Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

old Archer is interesting, but what if it was young Archer from the pilot, annoyed by how his future turned out.

Archer was supposed to die in season one, so there can't have been an old Archer until after he saved himself even though he didn't exist enough to save himself.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 01:06 AM   #36
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

No way!
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 01:19 AM   #37
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

When was Archer supposed to die in Season One? Who was going to be the Captain?

It should have been Erika. ERIKA.
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes.
J'onn: It's all I have.
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 04:56 AM   #38
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Terra 3
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

Captain T'Po'ls Boobs. The pips would be very suggestively placed.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:02 AM   #39
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

So if Archer was supposed to be Future Guy, why did Braga wait seven years after the show had been cancelled to reveal this? Was it some super secret that he was under contract not to reveal?
__________________
I never make mistrakes.
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:19 AM   #40
Guy Gardener
Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

teacake wrote: View Post
When was Archer supposed to die in Season One? Who was going to be the Captain?

It should have been Erika. ERIKA.
Cold Front s01e11.

According to Daniels, Enterprise was supposed to explode in a an accident in the episode and every one dies. Enterprise plays no part in forging the federation in the original timeline and Archer plays no part in forging the Federation in the original time line either.

Future guy positions the Silik, leader of the Xindi, to stop the first warp 5 engine from blowing up after it reacted badly to a local stellar anomaly spoofing.

Future Guy saved Archer.

This pissed off Daniels.

After Daniels got his end around and stopped the Xindi threat from continuing to save Enterprise from its predetermined expiration which was fucking up Captain Daniel's timeline, he would have rolled back time and destroyed Enterprise... Unfortunately Silik, or the crazy events of that day, topped Daniels before he could save the future from this impossible meddling kicking his 31st century homeland off kilter.

Archer was so stupid that he decided to help Daniels rather than Silik because he was massively pig ignorant about who his friends were and who his enemies were not.

(The later appearances of Daniels, was a different guy who came from a timeline where Enterprise was not done blown up.)

...

I suppose it's possible that old Archer could exist as a potential life form in the future if time was forced upside down inside temporal forcefields that are resistant to changes in the timeline, where he became more real after he shielded himself and then became furiously aware as to how nearly impossible his existence was given the facts of the most dominating histories running up and down the universe and Old Archer would have had no choice but to open a front in the temporal cold war to ensure his existence!
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:31 AM   #41
Admiral Buzzkill
The Man
 
Admiral Buzzkill's Avatar
 
Location: Defying Gravity
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

I couldn't make any of that out.
__________________
"I think [J.J. Abrams has] done a great thing for Star Trek. I’m very grateful to him. We all owe him a lot. When someone comes along like he has done and picks it up and elevates it, we should be grateful." - Leonard Nimoy
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:31 AM   #42
Melakon
Commodore
 
Melakon's Avatar
 
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

One thing that always bothered me about Enterprise-- there were several races we never heard of before (Suliban, the Xindi races) and events that were never heard about again in the chronological timeline of the later (earlier) series. Was this ever explained?

One thing I did like was references to races/systems that would later be destroyed (Malurians).
Melakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:41 AM   #43
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

Melakon wrote: View Post
One thing that always bothered me about Enterprise-- there were several races we never heard of before (Suliban, the Xindi races) and events that were never heard about again in the chronological timeline of the later (earlier) series. Was this ever explained?
I'm not so sure it needs an explanation. Space is big. Given that, I think Enterprise had a healthy dose of familiar elements mixed in with the unfamiliar.
__________________
"What do you hear, Starbuck?"
"Nothing but the rain, sir."
"Then grab your gun and bring in the cat."
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 05:56 AM   #44
sonak
Rear Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

this is just Braga pulling stuff from his butt. It is very clear from the direction that the TCW went in the series that Braga was just making stuff up about it as he went along, even before the big revelation that they had no idea who "future guy" was supposed to be.

The TCW COULD have been a good storyline had it not been so poorly thought out.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29 2012, 06:13 AM   #45
teacake
Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
Re: Braga: "Archer was supposed to be Future Guy"

Guy Gardener wrote: View Post
teacake wrote: View Post
When was Archer supposed to die in Season One? Who was going to be the Captain?

It should have been Erika. ERIKA.
Cold Front s01e11.

According to Daniels, Enterprise was supposed to explode in a an accident in the episode and every one dies. Enterprise plays no part in forging the federation in the original timeline and Archer plays no part in forging the Federation in the original time line either.
Oh right, I'm thinking you meant it was in Braga's original oft-fumbled plans for the series.

Voyager was supposed to explode in some timeline's accident as well.
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes.
J'onn: It's all I have.
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.