RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,879
Posts: 5,222,164
Members: 24,231
Currently online: 779
Newest member: Rhonson

TrekToday headlines

Takei To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 23

Yelchin In New Comedy
By: T'Bonz on Apr 23

U.S. Rights For Pegg Comedy Secured
By: T'Bonz on Apr 23

Shatner: Aging and Work
By: T'Bonz on Apr 23

Kurtzman And Orci Go Solo
By: T'Bonz on Apr 22

Star Trek #32 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Apr 22

Voyager Bridge Via The Oculus Rift
By: T'Bonz on Apr 21

Miles Away Glyph Award Nominations
By: T'Bonz on Apr 21

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 26 2012, 03:05 PM   #1
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
TOS's largest one time prop.



I recently rewatched Paradise Syndrome, and I got to thinking about the large obelisk in that episode, the asteroid deflector. Where did the production crew come up with this thing? Was it an existing monument that was modified for use in the show?. Or did they build it just for a single episode?

With the pedestal it's fairly large.

Even if it's just painted plywood, constructing the structure would seem to be beyond the budget of the usually cash strapped 1960's show. Again to be used once.

Consider the money (and time) it cost just to build the shuttlecraft.

I've considered that it might have already existed, someone else built it for another purpose, and the Star Trek crew discovered it and pressed it into service.

Anyone know? Construction photos would be nice.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 03:16 PM   #2
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

I recall seeing set design sketches for it in one of the Trek coffee table books, so yeah, I believe it was built just for the episode.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 03:29 PM   #3
ItsGreen
Commander
 
ItsGreen's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

ItsGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 03:32 PM   #4
Myko
Commander
 
Myko's Avatar
 
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

To be honest, it's not that big to construct. Take all the flat surfaces and try to build walls from them and you get barely a full room's worth.
__________________
Myko
Myko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 05:17 PM   #5
SchwEnt
Fleet Captain
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Still impressive, especially for a one-shot, especially for the low low budget 3rd season.

I'm surprised it got made. Given the lack of money in the 3rd season, I'd think doing the location shooting alone would have used up this eps funds. I'd think they'd find some other way to save money and show only the control room of the deflector or some other way to hint at it, rather than full-scale real article.
SchwEnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 06:08 PM   #6
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

It's really not that much bigger than the interior sets they'd construct on the swing stage for a given episode. Compare it to, say, the Oracle room in "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky and My Gosh, This Is an Awfully Long Title, Isn't It?" A similar amount of wood (presumably) and paint and decorations to suggest alien script, just put together to represent the outside of a structure rather than the inside. The biggest difference is that it was trucked out to the Franklin Reservoir instead of erected on Stage 10.

As for the budgetary issue, "The Paradise Syndrome" was the only extended location shoot in the entire season -- the only other exterior shooting in S3 was the swordfight scene in "All Our Yesterdays," which I assume was on the backlot. So the lack of location work elsewhere in the season would explain why they were able to afford a fairly elaborate location shoot in this one episode.

Oh, and would "prop" be the right word for this? A prop is something used or handled by an actor. I'd think this might go under the category of scenery instead. The actors do interact with it physically, but the same would go for a fake building facade on the backlot when the actors go through its door, say, and I don't think that would qualify that facade as a prop.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 06:09 PM   #7
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Franklin Canyon reservoir is north of LA in the mountains, they would have had to clear a site (bulldozer?), truck everything up there, union crew, construction equipment, materials, scaffolding and likely a small crane. One day (maybe two) for construction.

Then the production crew and actors would show up, if they lined it all up, single day shooting on location.

And when the shoot was over, I would imagine their permit would require everything be removed again, although being the sixties the site probably wouldn't have had to be restore to it's original state, like it would today.

Pricey.

T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 06:14 PM   #8
TremblingBluStar
Vice Admiral
 
TremblingBluStar's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Dodge, IA
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Well, as far as the budget of Trek goes, I believe the "slashed" budget of the third season is one of those myths that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. If I recall correctly, the original budget for the first season was around $200,000 per episode, or about $1.3 million today. The budget for the third season was $185,000 per episode. Smaller, but hardly slashed. I wish I could find the site where I found these figures. If someone else has a source, that would be great!

While cast probably took a larger chunk of that, keep in mind they didn't have to spend that entire amount on each episode. So cheaper bottle shows like "Day of the Dove" could be used to save money for larger episodes.

I recently watched season 1-3 on Netflix, and the thing that struck me, aside from the occasional 2005 era CGI, is that season 3 wasn't all that bad! Yes, there were very poorly written episodes like "Spock's Brain" and "This Way to Eden", but as a whole it was only slightly lesser in quality than the previous two. It was clear that writers had been shuffled, and Roddenberry took more of a hands off role in that characters behaved uncharacteristic at times, but it certainly wasn't cheap looking compared to the previous seasons.
TremblingBluStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 06:18 PM   #9
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Funny, I thought season 3 looked a lot cheaper. Almost no location work, less convincing or more minimalist studio sets, fewer guest stars and extras. Although sometimes they made the simplicity of the set design into an aesthetic virtue, as in "Spectre of the Gun" or "The Empath."
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 06:57 PM   #10
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Ah. Scroll down all the way to the bottom:
http://www.startrekpropauthority.com...jefferies.html

Jefferies' sketch for the thing.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 07:21 PM   #11
BillJ
Admiral
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Wasn't Apollo's temple from Who Mourns for Adonais? fairly large as well?
__________________
I'm not popular enough to be different! - Homer Simpson
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 07:59 PM   #12
Doug Otte
Fleet Captain
 
Doug Otte's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

BillJ wrote: View Post
Wasn't Apollo's temple from Who Mourns for Adonais? fairly large as well?
Yes, but Apollo's temple was an indoor set.

I agree w/ T'Girl. It seems to be a big expense, and something I never thought about before. Even if it's just cheap wood, it would seem very costly to truck to the location, assemble it, film it (while hoping it doesn't rain), then disassemble and cart it away.
Doug Otte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 08:26 PM   #13
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

Well, they had to truck the structures for Miramanee's village out to the location as well. It wasn't a very large village, just five fairly basic structures and a number of canoes, but the total amount of material involved seems at least as great as the amount of wood that would've gone into building the obelisk.

And if you think about it, the weight and volume of all those pieces of scenery probably wasn't as substantial as the weight and volume of the cameras, sound equipment, lights, generators, trailers for the cast and crew, craft services (food) table, etc. that they would've had to truck out to the location anyway. It's not like they normally would've just driven up there in a pickup. Location shooting is a major operation. Transporting and erecting the obelisk would've been a relatively small part of the total logistics.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 08:53 PM   #14
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

TremblingBluStar wrote: View Post
Well, as far as the budget of Trek goes, I believe the "slashed" budget of the third season is one of those myths that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. If I recall correctly, the original budget for the first season was around $200,000 per episode, or about $1.3 million today. The budget for the third season was $185,000 per episode. Smaller, but hardly slashed. I wish I could find the site where I found these figures. If someone else has a source, that would be great!
Inside Star Trek: The Real Story quotes the third season budget at $178,500 per episode (page 399). The second season budget was $187,500 per episode (page 317) according to the same book. Memory Alpha quotes the average first season budget at $190,635 per episode, although skimming I can't find the page number.

Although the decrease might not seem like a lot of money, when you take into account two years of salary increases for each of the regular and semi-regular actors (not to mention the additional increase in pay Nimoy negotiated for after the first season) it is. It doesn't help that many of the costs of production are fixed. Since you can't cut the salaries being drawn for above-the-line costs (writing, directing, acting) -- many of which are actually increasing -- that means the money has to come from below-the-line areas of the production. That's one of the reasons why only two episodes in the entire season went on location.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 26 2012, 10:51 PM   #15
Redfern
Commodore
 
Redfern's Avatar
 
Location: Georgia, USA
Re: TOS's largest one time prop.

And it's possible only two sides of the structure was built. Was the facade ever shot from the right side or the back? That would have saved some expense, both materials and labor.

Regardless, it was one of the most impressive elements depicted in Trek.

Sincerely,

Bill
__________________
Tempt the Hand of Fate and it'll give you the "finger"!

Freighter Tails: the Misadventures of Mzzkiti
Redfern is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.