TOS's largest one time prop.

[T'Girl]

I recently rewatched Paradise Syndrome, and I got to thinking about the large obelisk in that episode, the asteroid deflector. Where did the production crew come up with this thing? Was it an existing monument that was modified for use in the show?. Or did they build it just for a single episode?

With the pedestal it's fairly large.

Even if it's just painted plywood, constructing the structure would seem to be beyond the budget of the usually cash strapped 1960's show. Again to be used once.

Consider the money (and time) it cost just to build the shuttlecraft.

I've considered that it might have already existed, someone else built it for another purpose, and the Star Trek crew discovered it and pressed it into service.

Anyone know? Construction photos would be nice.

[Forbin]

I recall seeing set design sketches for it in one of the Trek coffee table books, so yeah, I believe it was built just for the episode.

[ItsGreen]

[Myko]

To be honest, it's not that big to construct. Take all the flat surfaces and try to build walls from them and you get barely a full room's worth.

[SchwEnt]

Still impressive, especially for a one-shot, especially for the low low budget 3rd season.

I'm surprised it got made. Given the lack of money in the 3rd season, I'd think doing the location shooting alone would have used up this eps funds. I'd think they'd find some other way to save money and show only the control room of the deflector or some other way to hint at it, rather than full-scale real article.

[Christopher]

It's really not that much bigger than the interior sets they'd construct on the swing stage for a given episode. Compare it to, say, the Oracle room in "For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky and My Gosh, This Is an Awfully Long Title, Isn't It?" A similar amount of wood (presumably) and paint and decorations to suggest alien script, just put together to represent the outside of a structure rather than the inside. The biggest difference is that it was trucked out to the Franklin Reservoir instead of erected on Stage 10.

As for the budgetary issue, "The Paradise Syndrome" was the only extended location shoot in the entire season -- the only other exterior shooting in S3 was the swordfight scene in "All Our Yesterdays," which I assume was on the backlot. So the lack of location work elsewhere in the season would explain why they were able to afford a fairly elaborate location shoot in this one episode.

Oh, and would "prop" be the right word for this? A prop is something used or handled by an actor. I'd think this might go under the category of scenery instead. The actors do interact with it physically, but the same would go for a fake building facade on the backlot when the actors go through its door, say, and I don't think that would qualify that facade as a prop.

[T'Girl]

Franklin Canyon reservoir is north of LA in the mountains, they would have had to clear a site (bulldozer?), truck everything up there, union crew, construction equipment, materials, scaffolding and likely a small crane. One day (maybe two) for construction.

Then the production crew and actors would show up, if they lined it all up, single day shooting on location.

And when the shoot was over, I would imagine their permit would require everything be removed again, although being the sixties the site probably wouldn't have had to be restore to it's original state, like it would today.

Pricey.

[TremblingBluStar]

Well, as far as the budget of Trek goes, I believe the "slashed" budget of the third season is one of those myths that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. If I recall correctly, the original budget for the first season was around $200,000 per episode, or about $1.3 million today. The budget for the third season was $185,000 per episode. Smaller, but hardly slashed. I wish I could find the site where I found these figures. If someone else has a source, that would be great!

While cast probably took a larger chunk of that, keep in mind they didn't have to spend that entire amount on each episode. So cheaper bottle shows like "Day of the Dove" could be used to save money for larger episodes.

I recently watched season 1-3 on Netflix, and the thing that struck me, aside from the occasional 2005 era CGI, is that season 3 wasn't all that bad! Yes, there were very poorly written episodes like "Spock's Brain" and "This Way to Eden", but as a whole it was only slightly lesser in quality than the previous two. It was clear that writers had been shuffled, and Roddenberry took more of a hands off role in that characters behaved uncharacteristic at times, but it certainly wasn't cheap looking compared to the previous seasons.

[Christopher]

Funny, I thought season 3 looked a lot cheaper. Almost no location work, less convincing or more minimalist studio sets, fewer guest stars and extras. Although sometimes they made the simplicity of the set design into an aesthetic virtue, as in "Spectre of the Gun" or "The Empath."

[Forbin]

Ah. Scroll down all the way to the bottom:
http://www.startrekpropauthority.com...jefferies.html

Jefferies' sketch for the thing.

[BillJ]

Wasn't Apollo's temple from Who Mourns for Adonais? fairly large as well?

[Doug Otte]

BillJ wrote:

---

Wasn't Apollo's temple from Who Mourns for Adonais? fairly large as well?

Yes, but Apollo's temple was an indoor set.

I agree w/ T'Girl. It seems to be a big expense, and something I never thought about before. Even if it's just cheap wood, it would seem very costly to truck to the location, assemble it, film it (while hoping it doesn't rain), then disassemble and cart it away.

[Christopher]

Well, they had to truck the structures for Miramanee's village out to the location as well. It wasn't a very large village, just five fairly basic structures and a number of canoes, but the total amount of material involved seems at least as great as the amount of wood that would've gone into building the obelisk.

And if you think about it, the weight and volume of all those pieces of scenery probably wasn't as substantial as the weight and volume of the cameras, sound equipment, lights, generators, trailers for the cast and crew, craft services (food) table, etc. that they would've had to truck out to the location anyway. It's not like they normally would've just driven up there in a pickup. Location shooting is a major operation. Transporting and erecting the obelisk would've been a relatively small part of the total logistics.

[Harvey]

TremblingBluStar wrote:

---

Well, as far as the budget of Trek goes, I believe the "slashed" budget of the third season is one of those myths that doesn't hold up under scrutiny. If I recall correctly, the original budget for the first season was around $200,000 per episode, or about $1.3 million today. The budget for the third season was $185,000 per episode. Smaller, but hardly slashed. I wish I could find the site where I found these figures. If someone else has a source, that would be great!

Inside Star Trek: The Real Story quotes the third season budget at $178,500 per episode (page 399). The second season budget was $187,500 per episode (page 317) according to the same book. Memory Alpha quotes the average first season budget at $190,635 per episode, although skimming I can't find the page number.

Although the decrease might not seem like a lot of money, when you take into account two years of salary increases for each of the regular and semi-regular actors (not to mention the additional increase in pay Nimoy negotiated for after the first season) it is. It doesn't help that many of the costs of production are fixed. Since you can't cut the salaries being drawn for above-the-line costs (writing, directing, acting) -- many of which are actually increasing -- that means the money has to come from below-the-line areas of the production. That's one of the reasons why only two episodes in the entire season went on location.

[Redfern]

And it's possible only two sides of the structure was built. Was the facade ever shot from the right side or the back? That would have saved some expense, both materials and labor.

Regardless, it was one of the most impressive elements depicted in Trek.

Sincerely,

Bill