|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
http://tng.trekcore.com/gallery/albu...silence110.jpg The Commander would be unable to both see and read the registry, due to lighting conditions, and the angle of the ship to the Enterprise. I checked the gallery at Ex-Astris-Scientia, and, even in the best conditions, it would be impossible for someone to read the registry. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
http://tng.trekcore.com/hd/albums/1x...int_hd_011.jpg It's just us the audience that would be suffering from the lack of light and resolution, supposedly. A character from the show could spot the telltale suffix letter - which would be what they would be expecting anyway, what with two out of the supposed six Galaxy class vessels having such a letter, and the idea of the heroes meeting themselves in the anomaly perhaps a less likely proposition than them meeting a sister ship. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
It shows that both ships are in an environment that lacks both matter or energy. This is opposed to the image you posted which shows the Enterprise reflecting the radiant energy of a star. We can read the registry on the Enterprise because of this radiant energy. Furthermore, there were no floodlights on the Galaxy-class starships. (The floodlights were used to illuminate the registry on other ships.) http://tng.trekcore.com/gallery/albu...silence114.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Commodore
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
__________________
I never make mistrakes. |
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Commodore
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
__________________
I never make mistrakes. |
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
The alien saw the registry on the Enterprise, but was not able to read their computers, so it tried to replicate something similar, an NCC prefix, followed by four numbers, followed by a dash and letter. Riker simply read it from the screen, and never bothered to double-check Starfleet ship registry in the computer. The only mystery in this case would be how it managed to come up with the name Yamato? Perhaps it pretended to be a crew member and gleaned it from a screen somewhere or simply asked somebody. PS. You might ask why he can't read the computers, well it's just an assumption based on the fact that the whole experiment would be useless if he could get into LCARS and find out about the meaning of death, or find out about males and females, or make the computers on the fake Yamato work (corect me if I'm wrong on this one) etc... I think the whole episode is based on him being far from omnipotent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Captain
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
That is, the name (which Riker cannot see) seems to be derived from the registry (which Riker can see) in a process where Riker reads out the registry and then comes up with the name. There's no need for "outside" confirmation - Riker's word suffices. Unless he's possessed. Worf seems jittery in the episode - but the teaser already establishes as much. He's probably undergoing puberty or something. The other heroes begin to act abnormally only when directly subjected to the Nagilum's whims, and the actions are short-lived and rather blatant. It doesn't appear, say, that the "Troi" and "Data" visiting Picard in his cabin would be the real crew members possessed; rather, they are illusions out of whole cloth. Having Riker be possessed just for the duration of creating a false connection between a registry and a name doesn't seem to fit the pattern. As for Worf being an expert on the Yamato bridge, all he says is that he's acquainted with the ship. He isn't necessarily saying there's anything special about the sister ship - merely that he isn't completely lost and for that reason is entitled to make a tactical recommendation to Riker. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: 3 Registries for the Yamato?
What we see in the episode, is Riker walking forward toward the magnified image of the Yamato. As Timo points out, he would have available to him far more resolution than we would, even if we were looking at the HD version of the screen. Then, we also have Data running a full scan on the Yamato after he hails it. At no point does any crew member go, "Hey wait a minute, the Yamato's registry is wrong!" They suspect the ship is an illusion because of the Warbird, but they do not suspect the registry is wrong. So, I'd argue that not only were the computers double-checked, they even performed a full scan of the Yamato. WORF: Captain, there's another vessel approaching in sector zero nine one, mark two six. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:47 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















