RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,375
Posts: 5,356,948
Members: 24,626
Currently online: 586
Newest member: Nostromov

TrekToday headlines

The Gene Roddenberry Project Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Moore: No Deep Space Nine Regrets
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pegg Star Wars Rumor
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 23 2012, 03:20 PM   #31
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

FordSVT wrote: View Post
Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Another factor may be how separate Sony keeps its entertainment division from its manufacturing division. If they're all free-standing divisions, with 'Chinese walls' (or Japanese walls in this case) between them, then Sony's tv and electronics may not be able to benefit from the sale of their ents division - it all depends on how creatively their accounts are set up.

And it should also be remembered that Marvel studios are notoriously thrifty. If Spidey's right go up to the highest bidder, then, while we would all like to think that Marvel is the webslinger's natural home - but they could well be outbid by another studio.
Or Disney could buy the rights to Spider Man, that would be the next best thing. No one has more money than Disney. If they think they'll profit by giving Marvel access to Spidey, they'll spend the dough. It would be peanuts compared to what they spent getting their hands on Star Wars.
That's a good point, I'd forgotten about Disney's deep pockets. Of course, having spent all that money on Spider-man and with them already having the Marvel movie verse rights, Disney may not want to spend all that money on yet another franchise.

Christopher wrote: View Post
I think both screen versions of Spidey are good, and I like it that they take very different approaches so that they complement each other. The first film suffered a bit by having to cover some of the same beats of the origin, but that shouldn't be a problem going forward (well, depending on what they do with the Osborns).
You mean the first of the Webb movies, as oppose to the first of all the big screen Spidey movies (the 2002 one), right?

Dream wrote: View Post
Ian Keldon wrote: View Post
Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
And it should also be remembered that Marvel studios are notoriously thrifty. If Spidey's right go up to the highest bidder, then, while we would all like to think that Marvel is the webslinger's natural home - but they could well be outbid by another studio.
Or they might regain the rights for nothing, depending on the exact nature of their contract with Sony. If the rights are "non-transferrable", then ONLY Sony would have the right to make Spider-Man under that contract. An end to Sony's entertainment division might see an automatic reversion of rights to Marvel.

I don't KNOW that's the case, but such a restrictive contract would be typical of Marvel.
Well, let's look at how FOX tried to deal with its expiring Daredevil rights before it finally reverted back to Marvel.

There were NEVER any talks about selling the rights to any other studio right?
I think part of the problem there was that by the time it became evident that Fox couldn't get their DD reboot up in time to avoid the reversion of the rights, the property was basically unsellable. Fox tried to get a relaunch with David Slade at the helm and then, after he bailed, Joe Carnahan made an unsuccessful pitch. By the time Fox decided that they didn't want to make the movie, the rights were only weeks away from expiring.

So even if Fox could have sold on the rights to another studio - and you may well be right that there is a restrictive covenant about selling on the rights, I don't honestly know the answer - the reality is that no other studio was going to do so as they were also going to have to get the whole shebang into operation in an unfeasibly short period of time.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 23 2012, 03:33 PM   #32
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Christopher wrote: View Post
I think both screen versions of Spidey are good, and I like it that they take very different approaches so that they complement each other. The first film suffered a bit by having to cover some of the same beats of the origin, but that shouldn't be a problem going forward (well, depending on what they do with the Osborns).
You mean the first of the Webb movies, as oppose to the first of all the big screen Spidey movies (the 2002 one), right?
Yes, that was what I meant.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 23 2012, 04:43 PM   #33
Kelthaz
Rear Admiral
 
Kelthaz's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

Ian Keldon wrote: View Post
Correct, which is why your example (Spide-Man vs Iron Man) would never happen. They're aimed at the same audience.
That was my example actually.
__________________
"Who are you?! And how did you get in here?!"

"I'm the locksmith. And... I'm the locksmith."
Kelthaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 23 2012, 05:47 PM   #34
Ian Keldon
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

^OOPS! Sorry!
Ian Keldon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24 2012, 02:12 AM   #35
Starbreaker
Fleet Admiral
 
Starbreaker's Avatar
 
Location: Chattanooga, TN
View Starbreaker's Twitter Profile
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

MacLeod wrote: View Post
After all the PS3 is what the third most popular of the 360/PS3/Wii generation consoles.
90% of X-Box 360 owners have to buy about 4 before the RROD stops.
Starbreaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24 2012, 02:17 AM   #36
Kestrel
Vice Admiral
 
Kestrel's Avatar
 
Location: East Tennessee
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

I don't really care who owns the rights, but I really don't want to see a reboot again so soon.

Or I guess more accurately, I don't want to see Garfield and Stone recast and another origin story told, because as much as I really liked Raimi's Spider-Man movies, I liked this last one even better. If Marvel got ahold of the property and tied it in loosely with their ongoing universe I'd be fine with that so long as it doesn't interfere with what Webb's planning for the second movie.
__________________
"If Romeo had just masturbated a couple of times a week he would have saved both those nice families a heap of trouble."
Kestrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24 2012, 04:29 AM   #37
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

Kestrel wrote: View Post
I don't really care who owns the rights, but I really don't want to see a reboot again so soon.

Or I guess more accurately, I don't want to see Garfield and Stone recast and another origin story told, because as much as I really liked Raimi's Spider-Man movies, I liked this last one even better. If Marvel got ahold of the property and tied it in loosely with their ongoing universe I'd be fine with that so long as it doesn't interfere with what Webb's planning for the second movie.
I really don't think future ownership will interfere with the next movie. IMHO, it will be claimed by the current Sony owners as "in the pipeline" and they will have full rights to it.

Movie 3, will likely be under discussion, but, I think II will proceed basically unimpeded
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 24 2012, 08:06 AM   #38
Dude
Vice Admiral
 
Dude's Avatar
 
Re: Sony's credit rating cut to "junk"...Implications for Spider-Man?

In terms of competing with each other on releases, keep in mind that both Amazing Spider-Man and Dark Knight Rises were released in the same month and ASM followed Avengers by only 6 weeks. Currently, they are 1, 2, and 4 on the list for highest grosses this year. It's possible that Skyfall or Twilight may outpace ASM, probable that The Hobbit will. But by any stretch, all three major comic book movies were wildly profitable this summer. There's plenty of room in the market.
__________________
"For every opinion, there is an equal and opposite opinion." - Newton's Third Law, Political Corollary

TNZ adaptation: "For every opinion, there is a monstrous bastard who has a different opinion."
Dude is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.