|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#421 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: 1123 6536 5321
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
Apart from some of the slightly shoddy artwork in some of the middle issues (Nick Runge & Stephen Mooney, looking at you) that definitely actually felt like I was reading Angel. As opposed to Season 8 & 9 where I never really get that feeling. It was also great how every issues flows into the next (really reminded me of Angel Season 4 that way) and that actually most of the story from #1 to #16 takes place over about 2 or 3 days in Hell-A. I'm pretty bored of Dark Horse's constant 4 issue arcs followed by a one shot, to ensure they all fit into their Trade Paperbacks. It was also surprising how much actually happens in ATF, there's never a pointless filler issue, which at times it seems is what 90% of Season 9 has been made up of. I recently caught up with some issues, Buffy 14, Spike 2 & 3, and A&F 15. I'm enjoying the Spike series; I just hope it goes somewhere. That A&F issue was cool, but they seriously need to kick the plot into gear now, do not give us another meandering pointless 4 issue arc. And Billy the Vampire Slayer?? Why should I care? Seriously, because I do not one bit. Seems to me they've just done this to shut up all the gay fans they seem to have on the letters page of each issue (going through all Season 8) asking why aren't there any gay characters. I couldn't care less if a character is gay, straight or Australian, I just want a decent story. And I'm not getting one with this book. |
|
|
|
|
#422 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#423 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: 1123 6536 5321
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
If Illyria, no they've never met one another (or Fred for that matter) |
|
|
|
|
#424 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#425 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: 1123 6536 5321
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
|
|
|
|
|
#426 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#427 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#428 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#429 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
A&F has so far been the best whenever it's focused on Whistler (who was such a minor character on BtVS the show and never even appeared on AtS) and the original characters (Nadira, Pearl and Nash), rather than on the many pointless and mostly OOC guest star appearances of various well known Buffyverse characters. Which is completely the opposite of what is happening in the Buffy title. But it's because these are the characters that have the strongest connection to Angel's season 8 actions and the Twilight plot, as the perpetrators or the victims. It's not surprising that the title is much better when it tries to address season 8 head-on than when it tries to sweep it aside or have everyone tell Angel how awesome he is and that he shouldn't feel guilty. (And maybe it's also due to the fact that Gage is just not that good at writing many of the well known characters in character. His writing of Dark Willow was particularly dreadful.) The Willow series is looking better than I expected - the interactions between Willow and Marrack in #2 were pretty funny, I like seeing Aluwyn back since, like her or not, she has an interesting dynamic with Willow, and it certainly helps that Willow is really doing something related to the big plot of the season in her issue - even though I'm still annoyed and bored with the fact that they're making "bringing back magic" the big goal/theme of the season, without having actually established why it's so necessary to bring it back. (They may think they have, but it really hasn't been convincing to most of the readers, I believe.) Now, I'm still waiting for the Buffy title to pick up and stop being so dull, shallow and lackluster.... and I'll say this, the latest issue was, for a change, not dull, something finally seems to be happening, and it's good to see Dawn and Xander back. I'd be excited for the arrival of you-know-who, if this hadn't been spoiled for months now. But the writing is still shallow and lackluster. The zompires are really poor villains with constantly changeable strength and don't seem nearly as threatening as we are supposed to think, Billy's ability to kill them en masse makes him a ridiculous Gary Stu (or makes the zompires look even more pathetic, if a skinny ordinary teenager with no training can kill so many of them without sweating), and are they really trying to set up a Buffy/Dowling romance (the dullest and most predictable plot point this season) while having almost all of the development in their relationship happen off-screen? It seems that they just think that Buffy + Generic Normal Human Dude who can slay things = Obvious Relationship, without having to bother to actually set up any dynamic. Which just shows that it's probably not meant to be a serious romance, but it is just really unexciting and shallow writing. I also don't believe that we're really meant to buy that Buffy has really found a new Scooby-Gang with Billy and Dowling (where's Cute Devon, anyway?), or if we are, they are really not selling it well. I'm guessing that the new super-strong zomp is a zompified Slayer. They must have realized how pathetic zompires are so they are now adding a Super-Zomp to spice things up. |
|
|
|
|
#430 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#431 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: 1123 6536 5321
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
http://buffy.wikia.com/wiki/Olivia And giving her surname as "Williams" is no doubt a nod to the Dollhouse actress of the same name, who played Adelle DeWitt
A recent pic of the Head clan with a certain someone- http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fb...type=3&theater |
|
|
|
|
|
#432 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#433 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
It doesn't help that the story is not so good, either. Buffy doesn't seem to have a brain this season, and Illyria, D'Hoffryn and others don't seem any better. Severin is a human who draws powers from supernatural beings but can be hurt with a gun, and instead of using a gun on him, they go against him with their superpowers?! What the what now?
|
|
|
|
|
#434 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#435 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Buffy season nine discussion thread
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:02 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















