|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
And as I said, the Pogo Paradox is attempted interference to prevent an event being the catalyst of the event they were trying to stop. The Borg caused the change in Earth's past, making the Enterprise follow and undo it. That sequence of events is what "always" happened (in-universe) in Treks timeline. A loop involvong a change and an undo. Don't get me wrong, it makes very little sense as does all sci-fi time travel. But I take the in-universe explanation from the guys in the future (+ENT's out-of-universe retcons) over the idea Enterprise is an altered history, which renders it moot as a prequel and ruins it's tie-ins to the later series' and movies.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: West of Boston
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
We the audience know that the Borg are kind of important and very real. The citizens of the 24th century Federation should not have knowledge of either sort. They should retain the right to treat the Borg as a hobby project or a myth of limited interest. And so, really, should Starfleet. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: West of Boston
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
Borg Queen: Launch sphere. Set course for 2063 and destroy the Phoenix, Earth's first warp ship, before the Enterprise follows us in Every drone in the galaxy (including seven): Acknowledged...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Commander
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
HOWEVER 7 of 9 then follows up her admission of the Borg succeeding in their goal. With testimony to their subsequent failure to assimilate earth and stop Cochram due to the intervention of the ENT-E to restore history to as close as it could be to what the Federation has recorded. I've posted this before so I'll say it again. How can 7 of 9 know about both of these events? It can't be a pogo paradox/casualty loop/ predestination paradox that the Borg would both succeed and fail in their goal. Because we saw it. The Borg succeeded in assimilating Earth. The ENT-E still existing to stop them was a stroke of luck because being a Federation starship it couldn't exist in a reality where the Fed never existed. The Borg trying to create a transmitter to contact the Borg is the Delta Quad. means they weren't successful in getting their situation of presence know to 21st century Borg. This is a scenario where the writers on VOY made a mistake. The Borg couldn't have both succeeded and failed and yet somehow it all be a paradox that it happened. I suspect the VOY writers thought it would be clever to try and pass this off. Hence the time police guy's line to 7 of 9 that in a way the Fed owes it's existence to the Borg. No it doesn't. The Fed owes it's continued but varied existence to the ENT-E crew for restoring history. Just like the people TOS, TNG, DS9 and VOY eras owe their continued but varied existence to Kirk and co. for bringing the whales from 20th century Earth to the future to stop the whale probe from destroying Earth. The events of First Contact should technically push Enterprise in to an alternate reality. With the Borg Drones left over in the artic region of Earth and all. Make sense really, the events of FC creating an alternate timeline that is subtly different but close enough to the original timeline where the first contact with the Borg was 'Q Who' and not ENT's 'Regeneration'. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
Last edited by AllStarEntprise; November 7 2012 at 03:15 PM. Reason: Page refreshed and double posted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
Prior to "Relativity", Seven said only that "the Borg were present during those events" (referring to First Contact) in "Year of Hell" - something implying first-hand info (i.e. from the message sent by the "Regeneration" survivors) rather than some collective-wide Spacebook update posted by the queen seconds before plunging into the time vortex. After all, someone like Seven wouldn't say the Borg WERE present if the last she knew was a plan to maybe hopefully if successful perhaps alter history.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
According to the novelization and an onscreen graphic, one of the ships bringing El-Aurian refugees to Earth was the SS Robert Fox (named for an ambassador featured in TOS), so it and the SS Lakul were perhaps Federation ships, not El-Aurian, but the Borg may have attacked and scattered Guinan's people many decades earlier, and a small group of survivors was finally making its way to a planet Guinan had visited before.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion) The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
I'd even go a step further and say that Star Trek XI is a continuation of the alternate timeline that Enterprise happened in. This would be the only way I can think of to explain the differences to the original timeline in that movie. The differences that were not caused by Nero.
__________________
Time is the fire in which we burn |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
What's the point of showing the start of the Coalition/Federation of Planets in "Demons"/"Terra Prime" if it's not THE Federation, but some alternate? Why explain the Klingon foreheads changing if that's not setting up the Klingons of The Original Series? Why make a huge fuss and intergalactic incident over the first Vulcan/human hybrid if not to forshadow Spock?
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
__________________
First delete the default cube. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: Did we know about the Borg sooner?
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:27 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















