|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commodore
Location: Oklahoma
|
Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
IIRC, it was never stated but in my opinion it could not have been less than 200-300 in order to make a major difference in the battle. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
If they damaged each other in constant ratio, though, there could be 200 Starfleet but just 400 Dominion ships left, in which case just 200 Klingons would turn the tide. This would be true only if the individual ships of Starfleet were twice as good as the individual ships of the Dominion. However, in melee battles like that, a combatant gaining a slight upper hand would typically be able to concentrate fire to quickly eliminate one opposing ship, leaving a greater ratio of ships to overpower the next victim, and again a greater ratio to deal with the next, and the next - until the initial underdog would be losing ships at an exponential rate, and the top dog would suffer virtually no losses. In which case 200 Starfleet ships left might indicate 1,100 Dominion ones left, and some 900 Klingons would be needed to make a difference. It appears that the ships did not fight duels; that Starfleet ships in average indeed were better than the smallest Dominion ships, although probably inferior to the bigger ones; and that a melee did take place, but without chance of significant concentration of fire, of "destruction in detail" tactics or other such factors. So an arbitrary mixture of the above models can be postulated, and the number of Klingon ships chosen exactly as one pleases. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Commander
Location: Mile High City
|
Re: Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
It was just the Klingons and the Federation at this point in the series, the Romulans weren't involved as of yet. But it was also the the Jem Hedar and the Cardasians. In the Next Generation we saw that at least Galaxies were able to top any Cardasian ship and the manner of talk was that at least in some ways Starfleet had superior technology to them. In DS9 we see the Klingons constantly pounding the Cardasians as well which was one of the reasons Dukat got the Dominion involved in the first place. I don't think to many Jem Hedar ships were taken out but a whole bunch Cardasian ships were. It would be interesting to know the ratio of Spoon Head ships to Jem Hedar ships that were sent in. Also, I don't know much with the term "flanking". But I guess there is more damage to be done to a ship if you were able to hit broadside as opposed to straight on. There is simply more to hit and strike at. It looked as though the Klingons came in on a different vector than the Feds. When the came in the dominion were already immersed with the Federation. Maybe the element of surprise along with there different vector was enough to fully turn the tide.
__________________
LCARS |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Klingon Ships In "Sacrifice of Angels"-Numbers?
What Dukat needs to crush his enemy would depend on such considerations. A 2:1 advantage to the defender would be fine if Dukat were defending a point target and geometry did not matter - but Dukat tries to stop the invaders at a distance from the wormhole (the Defiant actually needs to go to warp to reach the wormhole after penetrating the Dominion line), so he's at the mercy of geometry all right, and might need to outnumber the Federation ten to one to stand any sort of a chance. If he only goes 2:1 and the Klingons suddenly come from another direction, he's at a massive disadvantage, even if the Klingon arrival only adjusts the ratio to something like 2:1.1. Just musing... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















