RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,915
Posts: 5,388,641
Members: 24,717
Currently online: 576
Newest member: fanshere

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing November Trek Comic
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Pegg/Wright Trilogy In The Works
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Star Trek: The Compendium Rebate Details
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Gold Key Archives Volume 2
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Takei Documentary Wins Award
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Cumberbatch To Voice Khan
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Shaun And Ed On Phineas and Ferb
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

New Ships Coming From Official Starships Collection
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Trek Stars Take On Ice Bucket Challenge
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Retro Review: Profit and Lace
By: Michelle on Aug 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 31 2012, 09:30 PM   #1
thesonofodin
Ensign
 
Location: California
Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

I was wondering if Timo or anyone else has an updated guide. I love this work, and find it interesting.
thesonofodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 1 2012, 10:26 AM   #2
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

Well, I keep tinkering with it, so v47.314 might be of interest to somebody. But it's still just desk drawer writing at its worst. Links to three rather large pdf sections of the Guide:

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/440/partia.pdf/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/191/partib.pdf/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images...siiandiii.pdf/

Have you all looked through R. E. Mandel's chronology thing? It has pictures!

http://www.jh.kobarg.de/k7/timeline.php?q=fsc

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 04:00 AM   #3
thesonofodin
Ensign
 
Location: California
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

How do I download them? And for the record, I think you have the best History of Starfleet out there Timo.
thesonofodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 05:41 AM   #4
Albertese
Commodore
 
Albertese's Avatar
 
Location: Portland, OR
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

I just right-clicked on them and hit "Save As..." and now it lives in my "TrekBBS" folder.

Easy.

--Alex
__________________
Check out my website: www.goldtoothstudio.squarespace.com
Albertese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 06:07 AM   #5
thesonofodin
Ensign
 
Location: California
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

I was able to save the first part, but not the other 2. What am I doing wrong?
thesonofodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 06:15 AM   #6
thesonofodin
Ensign
 
Location: California
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

Never mind, I had to do it in IE instead of Firefox. Thanks Albertese.
thesonofodin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 07:10 AM   #7
Brainsucker
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

what is this guide?
Brainsucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 2 2012, 08:21 AM   #8
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

It's just a chronologically arranged encyclopedia of UESF and UFP Starfleet starships, in the style of Bill Gunston combat aircraft books, with a list of specs first, followed by a freeform article on the ship that describes the design, the reasons Starfleet wanted a ship like this, and possible associated pseudohistorical hijinks.

It contains all the canonical starship designs plus at least thrice as many ships from popular noncanon sources, primarily from RPGs (such as FASA or Star Fleet Battles), from computer games (Starfleet Command, Legacy, Starfleet Academy) and from classic books that turn unused sketches by the show's artists (Jeffries, Probert, Sternbach) into actual starships (Ships of the Star Fleet). It also adds ships mentioned or described in novels, and sometimes even in comics. The backstage "making of" books and tech manuals are also included.

It takes considerable liberties with the material to make it maximally consistent with modern canon. It tries to steer clear of introducing all-new, original ships, though, as the wider Trek universe is already chock full of designs. Also, if there exists a shape without a name (say, a study model or a background kitbash) and a name without a shape (a mention in a novel or sometimes even in onscreen dialogue), it tries to merge those two to keep things more compact.

Googling for "Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet" turns up surprisingly many older versions in circulation, mostly at rather filthy upload or torrent sites...

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3 2012, 06:10 AM   #9
Brainsucker
Lieutenant Commander
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

Oh, it's cool. Thanks for the guide. It helps me a lot with the ships that I wanted to understand more.

Just curious, why I can't find Sisko's Defiant there.... (maybe it just slips from my eyes) and why Nebula and Akira are older than Galaxy Class? I thought Nebula is created with Galaxy Class as it's base, and Akira is built to stand against Borg invasion.
Brainsucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3 2012, 12:03 PM   #10
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

These are fascinating. I'm gonna enjoy reading through them
Timo wrote: View Post
It takes considerable liberties with the material to make it maximally consistent with modern canon.
*twitch* those nuTrek ships should be far far bigger *twitch*
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3 2012, 05:48 PM   #11
KamenRiderBlade
Lieutenant Commander
 
KamenRiderBlade's Avatar
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

Timo, do you have the latest version condensed into a rar / zip file for easy downloading off of 1 site?
KamenRiderBlade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 5 2012, 03:24 AM   #12
FKnight
Commander
 
FKnight's Avatar
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

This is riveting, Timo. I'm just now getting to the Verne ship construction and I'm sitting back enjoying reading this on a Sunday night. Thank you.
__________________
"You have been examined. Your ship must be destroyed. We make assumption you have a deity, or deities, or some such beliefs which comfort you. We therefore grant you ten Earth time periods known as minutes to make preparations."
FKnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 5 2012, 08:18 AM   #13
TheRoyalFamily
Commodore
 
TheRoyalFamily's Avatar
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

I stayed up past 3am the other night reading this. And that was just the first one.

Did you have specific pictures that you've seen in mind when you wrote the captions, or were you hoping to get folks to make stuff for it?
__________________
You perceive wrongly. I feel unimaginable happiness wasting time talking with women. I'm that type of human.
TheRoyalFamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 5 2012, 12:26 PM   #14
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

It's about 90% wishful thinking. Some of the captions are for images that do exist, but usually with a nasty twist to what they are supposed to represent. Say, when I merge the Daedalus class with the Horizon of Spaceflight Chronology fame, I see no reason to dismiss the illustration from pp. 92-93. I just think that's how a neo-cubist would see the familiar sphere-and-cylinder vessel.

Dick Mandel did the opposite with his chronology, wrapping the captions around existing images, sometimes from wholly different representatives of the genre. I do that a bit, too - see the old Jeffries shuttlecraft, say.

Basically, none of the pics match the captions yet, except perhaps by happy coincidence. The pics are there mainly to give an idea of what already depicted ship the text is referring to.

Timo, do you have the latest version condensed into a rar / zip file for easy downloading off of 1 site?
That's the problem with constant tinkering: I seldom have the patience to wrap the results that way. Have patience, I'll zip it some time this week again.

Just curious, why I can't find Sisko's Defiant there.... (maybe it just slips from my eyes)
I've divided the ships in three major categories: big "actual" ships, smaller "coastal" types, and very small "craft". And Sisko's ship is small enough to be bumped down from the category of "real" starships to Part II where I also list other escort class vessels, corvettes and whatnot. That's where the Saber class goes, too, on account of being equally diminutive. So, the third pdf, the first half...

and why Nebula and Akira are older than Galaxy Class?
On account of their registries: the lowest known Nebula ones are lower than the lowest known Galaxy ones. Also, on account of the "nacelles down" ship being more numerous than the "nacelles up" one. I see the Nebula as the basic model which was then taken to luxurious extremes by adding the fancy saucer separation functionality and other bells and whistles. Only a few of the luxury model would be built, as opposed to the barebones design, and the luxury version would only be created after the basic model proved the concept.

Akira has low registries, too. And it looks sufficiently like a member of the family, with the same nearly round saucer, similarly bulging ramscoops and whatnot.

There are few exceptions to the rule of low registry meaning an old ship type in the Guide, at least in the 24th century. Oh, I have played a trick or two with FASA registries there, but canon ones (even for barely glimpsed kitbashes) tend to be treated as sacrosanct and "chronologically revealing".

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2012, 04:42 AM   #15
DEWLine
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Send a message via AIM to DEWLine Send a message via Yahoo to DEWLine
Re: Timo's Hobbyist's Guide to the UFP Starfleet

According to Firefox, I'm missing a couple of plug-ins...?
__________________
Yours,

Dwight Williams
Illustrator/Writer
DEWLine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.