|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#91 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Commodore
Location: South Dakota
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
If you're born in the Federation, you're a Federation citizen. That seems to be the case, or at least it's a widely believed item of fanon. And yet, what of the Maquis? They were looking to start their own independent state, but the Federation didn't seem to view them as independent. The Feds didn't even seem to agree on what their policy on the Maquis was. In TNG, it seemed that Picard had to remind the settlers that they were giving up their citizenship in the Federation by remaining on territory passing into Cardassian hands. In DS9, the admirals that Sisko reported to seemed to think the Maquis were Federation citizens. Which was it? |
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Could be anywhere really...
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
yes, that was a mess. The original understanding was that they were voluntarily giving up their citizenship, which made sense. Then, they're suddenly citizens again?!? I think the writers just messed that up. |
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Commodore
Location: South Dakota
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
it shouldn't have mattered. In this case, having the Maquis abandon their citizenship was pretty much the crux of the entire compromise. This was done so the Federation couldn't be dragged into a war by the DMZ colonists. Reversing that position would make no sense and would put the UFP in a WORSE position. (of course, we're talking about the kind of folks who signed a treaty voluntarily agreeing to put themselves at a technological disadvantage by not developing a cloak, so it's not out of the realm of possibility) |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Commodore
Location: South Dakota
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
The Maquis wanted to be independent, but the Federation's policy seemed to be that the Maquis were citizens that needed to be controlled and imprisoned for their insolence. The Maquis might have been forced to fight for their independence, eventually. Unfortunately for them, their successes, combined with the Klingon invasion, drove the Cardassians into the Dominion's arms. Anyway, the policy might have been a shift forced upon the Federation, perhaps because no other states recognized that the Maquis weren't Federation citizens. Especially the Cardassians - they might not be capable of conceiving of Humans/Vulcans/Betazoids as anything other than Federation citizens, and the UFP would end up being forced to deal with the Maquis to keep the peace with the Cardassians, regardless of the Maquis' own view on the matter. |
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Re: How would you have improved 'Paradise'?
__________________
Time is the fire in which we burn |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















