Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. - Page 39

Turtletrekker · October 26 2012, 01:23 AM

Circus Peanut wrote:

"Stark-inium"

According to "Fury's Big Week", Stark was calling the stuff "Badassium", but was running into difficulties with the patent office.

Samurai8472 · October 26 2012, 02:03 AM

Circus Peanut wrote:

Guess Pepper never wondered why those contractors were coming in and out of his basement to dig the hole for the suit-donning device.

He built the Mark 2 in about 11 days. Hardly enough time for contractors to do the work.

We've seen that he has robotic factory arms.

Deleted scene

The suit donning thing might have already been in his garage/assembly line.

Timby · October 26 2012, 02:04 AM

Spook/Hoorah! Admirer wrote:

Me too. I think it's the villain. He just reminds me of Bane.

So ... The Stark Knight Rises?

Spock/Uhura Fan · October 26 2012, 04:22 AM

Timby wrote:

Spook/Hoorah! Admirer wrote:

Me too. I think it's the villain. He just reminds me of Bane.

So ... The Stark Knight Rises?

Lol, something like that. And I'm sure the Tony Stark ego would love it.

Drago-Kazov · October 26 2012, 09:18 AM

The Starks are everywhere:
GOT, this and even Star Wars:
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Iaco_Stark

T'Baio · October 26 2012, 10:25 PM

How in any way is The Mandarin as depicted in this trailer reminiscent of Bane?

Genre fans need bigger imaginations.

Brikar99 · October 27 2012, 12:04 AM

T'Baio wrote:

How in any way is The Mandarin as depicted in this trailer reminiscent of Bane?

Genre fans need bigger imaginations.

I can kinda see it, in a very general way based on tone.

JarodRussell · October 27 2012, 01:27 AM

It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters.

Samurai8472 · October 27 2012, 01:55 AM

JarodRussell wrote:

It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters.

The helicopters are posing as News choppers

Stark probably thought they were paparazzi

Herkimer Jitty · October 27 2012, 02:06 AM

JarodRussell wrote:

It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters.

Iron Man is his defense.

Otherwise,

Private Citizen: "Can I have a AAA missile emplacement on my roof?"

US Gov't: "lol no."

Drago-Kazov · October 27 2012, 07:06 AM

Does he have a pemit for the suit? Its more lethal then a tank and people cannot own tanks and use them.

JarodRussell · October 27 2012, 10:50 AM

Samurai8472 wrote:

JarodRussell wrote:

It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters.

The helicopters are posing as News choppers

Stark probably thought they were paparazzi

JARVIS is more intelligent than to be fooled by that.

Captaindemotion · October 27 2012, 12:05 PM

Samurai8472 wrote:

JarodRussell wrote:

It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters.

The helicopters are posing as News choppers

Stark probably thought they were paparazzi

This scene actually reminds me of the scene where Gary Busey shoots Danny Glover's former friend and source from a helicopter in Lethal Weapon, written by Shane Black. Admittedly, it wouldn't have occurred to me but for the Black connection.

USS Mariner · October 27 2012, 08:21 PM

Drago-Kazov wrote:

Does he have a pemit for the suit? Its more lethal then a tank and people cannot own tanks and use them.

Actually, you can own a tank and use it, provided you fill out the paperwork and pass a few tests and background checks. If I recall correctly, in one state, the difference between a permit for tank that has it's muzzle de-bored and a live-fire muzzle is around $50.

Also, this issue was given far too little time in IM2.

Duncan MacLeod · October 27 2012, 08:35 PM

It seems to me that as a top US weapons manufacturer Stark would already have all the permits. I think he'd have to, just to be able to conduct his business.

The issue in IM2 was more along the lines of does he have the right to refuse to give his creation to the US Government.

October 26 2012, 09:18 AM	#575
Drago-Kazov Fleet Captain	Re: Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. The Starks are everywhere: GOT, this and even Star Wars: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Iaco_Stark

October 26 2012, 10:25 PM	#576
T'Baio Admiral Location: Ontario, Canada	Re: Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. How in any way is The Mandarin as depicted in this trailer reminiscent of Bane? Genre fans need bigger imaginations. __________________ Posthuman: A Science Fiction Web Series at www.sfntv.com and www.whatisameme.com, on the TrekBBS, and on the social network.

October 27 2012, 01:27 AM	#578
JarodRussell Vice Admiral	Re: Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. It's kinda funny that the greatest weapons technology supplier in the world and inventor of the Iron Man suit has no defense mechanisms at his house that would shoot down armed helicopters. __________________ lol l /\

October 27 2012, 07:06 AM	#581
Drago-Kazov Fleet Captain	Re: Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. Does he have a pemit for the suit? Its more lethal then a tank and people cannot own tanks and use them.

October 27 2012, 08:35 PM	#585
Duncan MacLeod Fleet Captain Location: New England	Re: Iron Man 3 Discussion/Photos/ETC. It seems to me that as a top US weapons manufacturer Stark would already have all the permits. I think he'd have to, just to be able to conduct his business. The issue in IM2 was more along the lines of does he have the right to refuse to give his creation to the US Government.

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US