|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
__________________
www.moviebreadbin.com Movie reviews sponsored by the man who lives in a tent in Brent Spiners back garden. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
Then we wouldn't have got the disaster of NuTrek.
__________________
I'd rather watch Star Trek: V and Nemesis a thousand times than be subjected to Abrams Trek again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Commander
Location: North Carolina
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
The Tucker thing in Enterprise was so bad, that I don't remember why or how that happened...but the 3rd and 4th season T'Pol sure is nice to look at...
__________________
Darling, you remain as aesthetically pleasing as the first day we met. I believe I am the most fortunate sentient in this sector of the galaxy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
So obviously we're going with improperly done. Let's establish what happened. Picard decides he's a senior badass and beams over to the Scimitar to stop Shinzon's super weapon. Conveniently the transporters are shot and can only beam him over and not back. Too bad they didn't have any shuttles hmm? So Picard gets over there and starts killing Remans by the dozens video game style. The he gets into the classic hand to hand battle with the villain. There's no stopping superhero Picard, except his arthritis makes him drop his weapons occasionally. He beats the bad guy, impales him on a giant spear and yep. Shinzon spouts off a dumb line and that just causes Picard to suddenly become wrought with emotion for killing poor little Mini Me. Yep, Picard's so overcome with grief over that he just doesn't think about all his friends over on the Enterprise dying. Too bad. Well Data does his silly physics defying space jump. Even he forgets they have shuttles too. Anyways, Data comes in to save the day. He puts his transporter tag thing on Picard and it beams him back. Now this makes zero sense for a couple of reasons too. A transporter tag, at least in the last movie, made a transporter lock possible in otherwise impossible circumstances. It stops interference. But it still requires the transporter on the other end to be working. Now it's just magic. It works. Or maybe the transporter tag thing is just smarter than our heroes and taps into the shuttles transporters if the main ones aren't working? Number two... why doesn't Data just grab Picard as he transports him away? There are any number of examples of this throughout Trek as early as STIV when Gillian grabs Kirk when he's beaming up. Power doesn't seem to be an issue, the transporter just grabs everything in a given three dimensional area and beams it up. Like the floating blood in STVI. Oh wait, how would Data blow up the doomsday core? Well bombs work... but even since he didn't think of this, there are multiple examples of both Federation and Romulan hand weapons being set to "overload" on a 30 second or so timer. Data had his phaser. Even if the transporter tag doesn't work to get Data back for whatever reason he can set it on overload and run back out to that hatch and jump back into space. So yeah, Data sacrificing himself was pretty much meaningless due to sloppy writing. I think it makes more sense that Data just couldn't take anymore of these movie scripts and offed himself.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
Commander
Location: North Carolina
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
__________________
Darling, you remain as aesthetically pleasing as the first day we met. I believe I am the most fortunate sentient in this sector of the galaxy. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
To rationalize the transporter thing somewhat, what goes down in the puff of smoke is probably the targeting system vital for transporting. Let's say it's all the more vital for transporting through the interference of the Bassen Rift. No lesser system, such as that of the shuttlecraft, can work in the Rift (we know from "Best of Both Worlds" and "Future's End" that shuttle transporters are grossly inferior to starship ones). So a signal enhancer is needed to sort it all out, and the button is a modern, miniature enhancer. That Data doesn't use the enhancer to beam back with Picard in the end is easily explained: he needs to finish the job, and expects to survive, thanks to being an android (up yours, thalaron dust!). That Data doesn't use the enhancer to beam back with Picard from Shinzon's lab earlier on... Cannot be explained. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Commodore
Location: Vasquez Rocks
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
And the idea of of Data overloading his phaser or putting it on a timer wouldn't have really worked. The thaloran radiation was about to be fired at the Enterprise and there would have been no time for him to get back to the hatch he came in from. It was down to something like thirty seconds. Another one of those pesky countdown clocks which always seems to get in the way.
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/ninjapimpskateboards Last edited by Vasquez Rocks; October 14 2012 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
But back to the question at hand, I wouldn't say anybody had to die. The question to ask does the death serve the story? In terms of Nemesis I don't think it did.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Captain
Location: Stain'd-by-the-Sea
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
LET'S KILL RIKER.
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
So, if subsequent to Picard death Starfleet had gone to Riker and gave him the option of the (presumably) more prestigious command of the Enterprise E, what would Riker do? Enterprise or Titan?
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Commodore
Location: billcosby
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
One of my favorite moments in TNG for some odd reason is when Jellico fires Riker, cut to next scene with Data in red.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Who should have been killed in Nemesis? (Not Stuart Baird please)
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:52 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.












The Tucker thing in Enterprise was so bad, that I don't remember why or how that happened...but the 3rd and 4th season T'Pol sure is nice to look at...




