|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
|
The Micro Machine sets
One thing I've always wondered is who exactly was in charge of picking which ships they'd make a toy out of? Now you have the obvious ones: We had all the Enterprises up to that point, and all other "hero" ships and stations (DS9, Voyager, Excelsior, Runabout, Defiant). You had pretty much all the ships of best known and/or often seen aliens (Klingons, Romulans, Cardassians, Borg, and eventually Jem'Hadar). You also had all the Kazon ships, which were pretty regular on Voyager at the time, plus the Maquis ship and Caretaker array, both of which were pretty prominent in the premiere. You had a couple of other notable Starfleet ships: Reliant, Grissom, Stargazer, Saratoga, Farragut (which was really only notable for being the best shot of a Nebula class ship, but I'm glad they included one of this class), and a few shuttles and space stations. By the end, though, they were starting to do a number of "ship of the week" types. like the Miradorn, Klaestron, Numiri, and Karemma ships (or that weird "solar sailing ship"). I don't have a problem with this. I'm curious what made some get picked and not others: -I'm surprised, for instance, that they never made one for the Merchantman despite being pretty clearly seen in ST3. (I'd rather have seen that than the Spacedock shuttle). The Jenolan certainly wasn't one of the more graceful looking Starfleet ships, but that one might've been nice. -I'm not sure who picked the inaccurately named "Cardassian Obsidian" (really a Keldon-class, which was just a Galor with some spare parts slapped on). I'd rather have seen the smaller Cardassian ship we saw in "Profit and Loss" and "Tribunal". -The T'Pau is one that might've been interesting to see, along with the Batris/Xhosa. -I'm not generally a fan of asymetrical ships (except the Breen one), so probably just as well they never did the Borg ship from "Descent" -The Tholian ship might've been the one notable TOS ship they missed. -I would've liked to have seen the Groumall from "Return to Grace" and the Vidiian ship from "Deadlock", but it might've been too late for those ships. Of course nothing got released after '96, meaning no Dominion warships, Phoenix, Prometheus, Dauntless, Equinox, Delta Flyer, or Breen ships, let alone anything from "Enterprise". Pity. I think they may have been the best licence "Trek" toy makers (or at least a tie with Playmates and Johnny Lightning). Thoughts? Any other pre-1996 ships you think they missed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Delta Vega ¯\_(°·O)_/¯
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
Location: I said out, dammit!
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
My kitbashes: http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbash/trekpage.html My Kitbash Wallpapers: http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...allpapers.html My kitbash calendar: http://inpayne.com/calendar/kbcalendar2013.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Commander
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
I was able to get the first one (plus the Star Wars set) up here, but, for reasons I'll never understand they never sold the second or third in Canada. My dad was able to pick up the second one for me on a business trip in Vegas, but that third one torments me. It haunts my dreams. (Okay, maybe not that much, but I still want it). As I said, I'm curious who got to decide which ships they'd make. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Commodore
Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
As to who was in charge of selecting them...who knows? But yeah, some of their choices were just bizarre...I mean, the Numiri ship? Who the hell were they? I think the problem at the time was that during both DS9 and VOY, both series had lots of one-off aliens and not a lot of new Starfleet, Klingon, or Romulan ships other than what we saw in TNG. Plus, the Akira, Saber, Steamrunner and Norway class ships were seen so briefly, and had zero info about them at the time, that I can understand their omission (but there's really no excuse for not having the Phoenix or the T'Plana'hath IMHO...) Also, they could have made another three-pack of TOS with the Tholian ship, the Aurora, and the Fesarius. The Merchantman would have been another good choice (I remember FASA's miniature of that ship, and it was quite cool-looking). Ditto your feeling about the Jenolan. I also wouldn't have minded seeing the original large TNG shuttlecraft, a workbee, a travel pod, Regula One, and the Bozeman.
__________________
I never make mistrakes. Last edited by Dukhat; October 23 2012 at 04:58 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Commander
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
Last edited by E-DUB; October 23 2012 at 04:22 AM. Reason: added something |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
Sir Isaac Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
My biggest toy wish is a set that features all of the Enterprises in scale with the Micro Machine TOS Enterprise. With Hasbro now having the license to make toys from TOS to Star Trek XI, they could make that happen.
__________________
"Shout, shout, let it all out..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Delta Vega ¯\_(°·O)_/¯
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
Same goes for the other one-shot ships I mentioned. One upside to this, however, is you can pretend a Klaestron ship is a T'Lani ship, or Tamarian ship, or even a totally new alien ship. Why did the Saratoga lack the "guns" (if that's what they were)? Not sure. Perhaps they simply took a look at the studio model and assumed it was simply a Reliant look-alike without the roll bar. Interestingly, though, they didn't use the same molds they did for Reliant. The Saratoga's noticeably thicker. I think you gotta give them a pass for not making any "First Contact" ships, other than the big "E": Being the "hero" ship, the E was almost certainly designed long before any other ships from the movie. It's likely Galoob's time making Star Trek ships ran out around that time, meaning any other ships from the movie probably would've been too late. (Possibly true of the Groumall and Vidiian ship as well, both of which, I think, were first seen in spring of '96). The yellow Stargazer was clearly because the Ready Room model got a hell of a lot more screen time than the studio model. In fact, the packaging on the back shows the incorrect registry (NCC-7100) that the Ready Room Stargazer had. A Merchantman would be nice. Same goes for a Tholian ship (since they were the same model, I doubt they'd to an Aurora). Forgot to add earlier that a Maquis/Federation fighter would be nice too. I agree with Regula One. That smaller Cardassian ship (I think they're called Hideki class) would've been a better choice than the Keldon Class. And, yes a Jenolan wouldn't have been bad either. A T'Pau too. Honestly, I don't need to see all that many types of shuttles, though. I think the Galileo, the TNG shuttle, and the Voyager shuttle are enough. The Spacedock shuttle didn't excite me (especially when they could've made a Merchantman instead). Seeing other TNG shuttles, the travel pod, or a Workbee really didn't interest me. I'm not sure a Fesarius would work either. I don't a problem with it myself, but I'm not sure they'd bother with the Bozeman, after doing two other VERY similar looking ships. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Along the border of Talarian space
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
![]() I always wanted to get the Enterprise-A, then in the later releases all the really cool looking alien ships and the Pasteur, but unfortunately I never could find them. I would get them from eBay, but they're stupidly expensive for a toy so I'll just live with my happy memories.
__________________
Avatar: Captain Hilgrat Ja-Inrosh (deceased), Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Silverfin NCC-4470, Border Service Third Cutter Squadron Manip by: FltCpt. Bossco (STPMA) |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special. Last edited by The Wormhole; October 24 2012 at 03:02 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Captain
Location: Liverpool
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
____________________________________________
Hellooo... |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: outpost 41
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
__________________
Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||||
|
Commander
|
Re: The Micro Machine sets
Early on, one of the nacelles on the Reliant came off (I know what you're thinking, but it was the WRONG nacelle! ) Eventually the other one came off too, but both can still be fitted back into place.Set II is in much better shape, because I was older when I got that, but whoever made it did a sloppy job with a couple of them: With the saucer-separating Enterprise-D, the "neck" is seriously sticking out of the secondary hull, and the phaser ring on top of the saucer is totally from where it should be. I hardly ever did anything with that one, just because it looked so bad.
|
|||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.












) Eventually the other one came off too, but both can still be fitted back into place.




