|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Does it matter?
|
Why can't Latinum be replicated?
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
For all we know, it can, just like hundred-dollar bills can be printed. But money is money: it has value because people agree that it does. Today, worthless pieces of paper have value because we agree that they do. The agreement would be thrown into confusion if everybody replicated these pieces of paper, so we insert codes into the as such worthless material to prevent this. The Ferengi probably insert codes into their as such worthless latinum, too. And replicating a code doesn't add to your possessions, because codes are unique and supposedly will be checked against a database. A hundred bills (or latinum bricks) with identical codes are only worth one bill (or brick), plus a few years in jail... Today, we don't check even bills worth a thousand dollars against a code database as a matter of routine, because that's way too difficult to do; we trust that the other anti-copying measures work. But in Trek, checking against a database would be trivially easy. Of course, not all coding need be database-reliant. Quark has been known to check the value of the small latinum strips by biting. Perhaps programming an authentic taste into the strips takes a lot of replicator resources (many people complain that replicator food doesn't taste as good as "real" food), and only an idiot would thus replicate a strip of latinum when it costs 153 strips to get the taste right. The bigger units such as slips and bricks could of course retain the taste coding, but would also have more complicated things in them, just like bills are more complexly coded than coins today. The idea is never to outright prevent copying - it is merely to make copying more expensive than the acquisition of the real deal. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Portland, OR
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
We've seen pure latinum in "Who Mourns For Morn" and it looked like silver paint fresh from the jar. Assuming it's a metal, then the fact that it's a liquid would suggest it's some sort of mercury amalgam, possibly with a noble metal like platinum. I don't know how well those two could combine, but evidently the Ferengi (or somebody) developed the right secret sauce to make it work. From the same episode, we see that the "gold pressed" nature of gold-pressed latinum is that the silvery liquid is somehow suspended inside the gold bricks. Quark is able to fairly easily break one of these bricks in half with his hands which suggests that either he is waaaay stronger than he looks (doubtful given the number of scraps we see him in where he doesn't get the upper hand) or that the gold is manufactured in such a way that the structure is a much more porous volume which is later infused with the liquid latinum. When Morn regurgitates a little spitful of the stuff for Quark, the amount is valued at an astonishingly high figure (like 100 bricks IIRC) which suggests that a little goes a long way and that the gold vessels are mainly there to provide a convenient and attractive means of handling the latinum. I posit that the process for creating latinum itself is tricky and the resultant material is not entirely stable. As a result, maybe it can't be re-materialized in it's alloyed form. Do we ever see gold-pressed latinum transported? (We very well might have... just I can't think of a time doesn't mean it didn't happen.) If not then perhaps it's just a matter of that. If you can't rematerialize it, then you can't replicate it. If, OTOH, it transports fine, then my idea is out of the water. In any case, all we can do is speculate, since it was never said on screen one way or the other. --Alex
__________________
Check out my website: www.goldtoothstudio.squarespace.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
It's implied throughout DS9 you can't replicate it, but never flat out said. If you could replicate it that regurgitated latinum that Quark got so excited about wouldn't be anything important for example. The novels flat out state it can't be. I always thought Quark's biting the latinum was testing either it's density much like we did with gold(maybe gold with latinum in it has it's own unique density?) or the sound his teeth make against it(since Quark says GPL makes a unique sound).
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
Food and drink are not expensive in the Trekiverse, but things like computer chips and devices are implicitly so, due to their scarcity and the need to repair things by hand instead of simply throwing them out and replicating new ones.
__________________
He hoped and prayed that there wasn’t an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn’t an afterlife. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
We know that some things are more difficult to replicate than others, and that sometimes people don't go to the effort of creating perfect replicas even when such things would matter (say, Romulans creating fake gore in "Data's Day") - but OTOH we never hear that something would be completely impossible to replicate. It just isn't worth the effort, apparently, if something can also be obtained by mining or other "conventional" processing and this is cheaper or quicker than replication from thin air. If replication difficulty indeed comes in degrees, then it doesn't matter that latinum can be replicated - it suffices that it's suitably difficult to replicate, and any effort at producing it out of cheaper materials or pure energy or whatever will end up costing more than the end product is worth.
And our Starfleet heroes at least consider all technology to be throwaway, up to and including entire starships! Probably we're seeing "subsidies" in action: things considered necessary for good life or national security are replicated free of price even if their replication is of the costlier sort, and the price tag comes from the labor involved in the later stages of assembly or serving. Timo Saloniemi |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
Interestingly, the same thing seems to happen on the Enterprise: Scotty finds synthehol insufferable, but the only way to get a non-syntheholic drink is to raid Guinan's liquor cabinet. OTOH, circuitry and hardware are only "free" to the extent that Starfleet's requisition process seems to be pretty straightforward. We have almost never seen officers pulling working components and/or tools out of a replicator. Even the infamous self-sealing stem bolts, for example, are occasionally seen stockpiled by the case, but despite their apparently high industrial value, nobody ever bothers replicating them (just storing them in huge quantities because they have too many).
__________________
He hoped and prayed that there wasn’t an afterlife. Then he realized there was a contradiction involved here and merely hoped that there wasn’t an afterlife. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
__________________
. The things that come to those who wait -- will be those things left behind by those who got there first. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
DS9 has plenty of Replimat scenes that would qualify on one level or another... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: On the USS Sovereign
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Commander
Location: Twenty million die by fire if I am weak.
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
So regardless of the input method, X amount of energy/work produces Y amount of Latinum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
Of course today it take 1.6 cents to make a penny.
__________________
. The things that come to those who wait -- will be those things left behind by those who got there first. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Does it matter?
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
I wonder if Latinum is similar to Bio-mimetic Fluid, but without any actual practical applications?
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Commodore
Location: South Dakota
|
Re: Why can't Latinum be replicated?
Perhaps the Great Monetary Collapse that hit Fereginar back in the day was the result of too much fresh latinum being injected into the Ferengi economy. Perhaps this economic disaster spurred the Ferengi to tightly regulate the amount of GPL in the economy to prevent rampant inflation. Rather than making latinum special by claiming it is "unreplicable", it is merely another fiat currency with strict regulations on replication. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| latinum, replicator |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















