|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
No, I think the only way to have a Religious person like that would be for them have a different function on the ship, say an Engineer who just happens to be Religious, and people seek out that Engineer because of their balance and their morals and ethics. Or even perhaps someone with the Position of Counselor, who happens to be someone religious. Maybe even center some stories around Religious conflict for them. IE: Their Religious Beliefs lead them to believe the right thing to tell a patient is one thing, but, their Counselor Duties and teachings tell them they should be telling their patient the exact opposite. So, yea, a Chaplain as a position, I don't think would work, you'd have to give them another position, but, they just so happen to be Religious.
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
"You know. 1966? Seventy-nine episodes, about thirty good ones." - Phillip Fry describing Star Trek, Futurama |
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Commander
Location: United States
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
They could even go in deeper, say a Catholic priest whose scientific research led him to join Starfleet (or come aboard for one mission and hang around for the next seven years for some reason). He can be shown occasionally performing mass in his quarters or with a small group of people, occasionally providing religious advice of a more general nature, but spend most of his time reversing negative space wedgies to save the ship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Does it matter?
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
From which culture of which planet? Do we have to listen about sermons on the Vulcan Katra, for example?
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Oklahoma
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
You really don't have to use your imagination too much on this. Troi IIRC was only shown counseling human crew members. Shouldn't she have been familar with the mental potential problems and needs of all the different crewmembers? |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
--DonIago It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek... "If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!" |
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | ||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Ireland.
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
How about China. How about Iran. How about Somalia. How about Mozambique... and then, inevitably, how about Vulcan, Andoria, Betazed, etc. Star Trek may fall considerably short of the ideal in terms of depiction but that's definitely something it at least notionally has striven for.
...absolutely. I mean is that a rhetorical question because I don't see any way of answering that than 'yes.' On Star Trek the fictional beliefs of alien races - the mythology of the Klingons, the Bajoran faith in the Prophets, etc. - are treated seriously because that matter to the characters from those traditions, and in fiction a fictional character's fictional faith can matter as much to them as a fictional character's faith in a real world equivalent. That is kind of exactly what Star Trek is all about. Idic, to invoke a fictional principle belonging to a fiction race. Fictional religion obviously doesn't matter anywhere near as much in the real world but in the context of that fiction, that's another story. And he's not even a real chaplain, just a guy with an attitude. He's welcome on Mal's boat, but not his book! ...sept when it is.
Star Trek is American by default and that's always going to colour its perception of the future and human culture in general, even ignoring ridiculous moments like Captain Kirk reading the constitution on an alien planet; it's also why basically the only religiously observant human character on Star Trek is a Native American. ...which does suggest for starters that your choices are not 'Christian' or 'atheist' for chaplain religions, even ignoring invented alien faiths and given a narrow American focus. Why not a Muslim chaplain out of Dearborn, Michigan? A Rabbi from the Southeast? A Unitarian Universalist, whatever. Lot of choices they can make here. It is playing with hot coals, obviously, because if they write a Muslim chaplain - for example - it would then be important to get his religious references and his or her knowledge of the Qur'an and the hadiths all right, and any given moral judgement he makes would be as debated as... any of the moral judgements ever on Star Trek (look around the forums, seriously) but with the added colour of interrogating it from the religious angle, either averring that the chaplain made the choice because of flaws in his or her faith or that their decision was inaccurate in what someone of that religion would do. On top of that people may find any suggestion that his or her religion's attitudes have changed towards anything to be offensive or whatever. Lot of issues to work with there, lot of ways it could go wrong, and in some senses having a character who is personally religious but not a chaplain is easier because their actions are less likely to be assumed to be representative of their faith (although that's always also a risk). ...and add to this a lot of what one can write for a chaplain can also be written for a counselor. That's a derided job in Trek for various reasons, but I honestly feel that Troi was at her best when she was actually taking patients and trying to help them get through something, and I think it's a role that Star Trek could still use.
__________________
'Spock is always right, even when he's wrong. It's the tone of voice, the supernatural reasonability; this is not a man like us; this is a god.' - Philip K. Dick |
||
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Mentone
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
You perceive wrongly. I feel unimaginable happiness wasting time talking with women. I'm that type of human. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Why Not A Starfleet Ships Chaplain As A Main Character?
__________________
--DonIago It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek... "If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!" |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















