RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,218
Posts: 5,437,820
Members: 24,953
Currently online: 470
Newest member: Kavanc

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 12 2012, 02:36 AM   #61
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

FKnight wrote: View Post

I went to the theater to watch Trek '09, but with the new Trek movie, I'll probably go back to what I was doing from ST7 on -- waiting for it to come out on Netflix.
It's okay, I'll be paying for your ticket X 10 at the very least.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 04:01 AM   #62
nightwind1
Commodore
 
nightwind1's Avatar
 
Location: Des Moines, IA
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

SeerSGB wrote: View Post
Rainbow Dash wrote: View Post
SeerSGB wrote: View Post

Not only just now posts it on the 'net, but it passes for a "headline" regarding 'Trek. Enough so, ever Trek board and fansite out there--it seems--is reporting on it

I used to dislike the '09 movie with a passion. Had issues with trying to make it all work in "canon" and all that old noise. Still don't like the Engine Room set. But you know what, I actually enjoy it as a fun little popcorn-flick on it's own merits. I stopped worrying about how it was supposed to fit with the older stuff, took it for its own thing, and moved on. I still think it's more action and style over substance and story, but that's okay; sometimes that's all someone needs out of a movie.
See, I loved the movie, and still do, but I went in for similar reasons. I had been burned out on Star Trek, and my thoughts were "help me love Trek again". I came out of that theater feeling like a new fanboy, feeling the same way I did when TNG premiered (having been raised on TOS, I was thrilled to death when the promos ran). Trek was alive and relevant again!
If they kept this take on the characters strictly in movies, I could follow a film-franchise of this type of Trek. I don't think I"d like it--or that it'd work--on a weekly TV level.
Yeah, who'd ever watch a show about a starship exploring strange new worlds with it's captain, it's alien first officer and it's grumpy medic?

It'd never work.
__________________
Remember: No Matter Where You Go, There You Are...88

May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
nightwind1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 05:56 AM   #63
Devon
Fleet Captain
 
Devon's Avatar
 
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

Set Harth wrote: View Post
FKnight wrote:
I'll probably go back to what I was doing from ST7 on -- waiting for it to come out on Netflix.
Wow, for ST7 that must have been a long wait.
Busted!
__________________
Follow my Star Trek Model builds, music, art and more at Devon's Corner.
Devon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 09:33 AM   #64
UFO
Captain
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

KingDaniel wrote: View Post
...

What I find really impressive about the above comparison is how everything of the left side looks like a twentieth century factory of some sort (in one or two cases perhaps a milking shed) and the other side looks futuristic. How the heck did you do that?

You know, once you stop counting pipes and tanks (which is like observing that a chimp and a human both have arms and legs) and just look from one side to the other, you would have to put on a welding mask and close your eyes to get the impression there is a comparable degree of apparent technological advancement. Or are you actually saying you don't see that? That to you, the left side appears just as "advanced" as the right?


teacock wrote: View Post
I thought it looked a lot more like a real engine room than anything we saw in TOS.
I believe there's a reason for that.
UFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 10:08 AM   #65
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Vice Admiral
 
Flying Spaghetti Monster's Avatar
 
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

I still think Red LEtter Media's review is just about perfect!
__________________
See, the problem is that you are using your cards to show me what cards you have, and if you can't see that this is viciously circular, then there is no point in continuing
Flying Spaghetti Monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 10:25 AM   #66
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

UFO wrote: View Post
KingDaniel wrote: View Post
...

What I find really impressive about the above comparison is how everything of the left side looks like a twentieth century factory of some sort (in one or two cases perhaps a milking shed) and the other side looks futuristic. How the heck did you do that?

You know, once you stop counting pipes and tanks (which is like observing that a chimp and a human both have arms and legs) and just look from one side to the other, you would have to put on a welding mask and close your eyes to get the impression there is a comparable degree of apparent technological advancement. Or are you actually saying you don't see that? That to you, the left side appears just as "advanced" as the right?
The stuff on the right looks like a set, attempting to resemble the stuff on the left on a modest TV budget from the 1960's. Note the forced-perspecive pipes behind the grate, to give the illusion of scale and, well, more big pipes.
The only thing "advanced" is the bank of computer consoles, and STXI had touchscreen terminals dotted throughout their brewery.

Compared exclusively to TMP I could see your point. But TMP changed engineering from TOS as much as they changed the Klingons. It went a decentralized load of pipes and tanks, none of which had a set function (in fact, Engineering's location itself fluctuated between the rear of the saucer and the secondary hull!), to a chamber built around a glowing blue tube.

As I said in my earlier post, the engineering section in TOS was supposed to be much larger and more complex than what they could afford to depict in the 60's. Ben Finney certainly could not have remained hidden for days in the TOS engine room as we saw it!
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 10:50 AM   #67
Mach5
Rear Admiral
 
Mach5's Avatar
 
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

I don't think the main problem with the engineering are pipes. It's the fact that it doesn't look at all futuristic. It's a brewery, and it sure as hell looks like one. And even though I never quite liked it, I don't mind it that much.

But just look at how Scott Chambliss envisioned it:





THAT would have been something. But yeah, budget issues and all...
__________________
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines."
― Bertrand Russell
Mach5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 10:57 AM   #68
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Vice Admiral
 
Flying Spaghetti Monster's Avatar
 
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

Overall, I think the engine room in Enterprise is pretty good.. looking fictional, futuristic, but also interesting, with two levels that give the characters something to do
__________________
See, the problem is that you are using your cards to show me what cards you have, and if you can't see that this is viciously circular, then there is no point in continuing
Flying Spaghetti Monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 02:07 PM   #69
malchya
Lieutenant Commander
 
malchya's Avatar
 
Location: Olympia, WA
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

The brewery debate again...my apologies for starting that one running. Look, folks, if you liked the look of the engine room, then good for you. My complaint, voiced in plenty of other threads, is that - to me - it looked like exactly what it was: a brewery. I've worked in a brewery, so I recognized it as such immediately and it slammed me back to the 21st century, destroying my willing suspension of disbelief. They could have used the engine room of the liberty ship Jeremiah P O'Brien for much the same effect, and it would have resulted in the same response from those who know what a steam engineering plant looks like.

I really hope they build a decent set this outing rather than reusing the brewery.
malchya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 02:59 PM   #70
Mach5
Rear Admiral
 
Mach5's Avatar
 
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

Flying Spaghetti Monster wrote: View Post
looking fictional,
__________________
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines."
― Bertrand Russell
Mach5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 03:12 PM   #71
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

I think he meant "functional"
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 03:55 PM   #72
Satyrquaze
Vice Admiral
 
Satyrquaze's Avatar
 
Location: Satyrquaze
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

malchya wrote: View Post
I really hope they build a decent set this outing rather than reusing the brewery.
How exactly would you explain away the blatant and drastic change the Engineering set from one movie to another? And before anyone points out that we've had several movies already where this is already the case, I preemptively call BS.

ST:TMP - Introduces the Engineering set design which will influence all future Engineering sets.
ST2 - Uses essentially the same set, but different camera angles are used and the focus is shifted from the warp core to a glass-walled side room.
ST3 - What little we see of it appears to be the same set.
ST4 - We don't see the Enterprise's Engineering set at all.
ST5 - All Scotty gets is a console in a hallway with dangerously low-hanging pipes.
ST6 - The set designers slightly re-dress the TNG engineering set. But, since we really didn't see a set last movie it's largely a moot point.

I think a major chage to a set at this point would be even more glaring than leaving it as it is. It would represent J.J. and Co. giving into the demands of a vocal minority of Star Trek fans who happen to know a lot less about set design than they do.
__________________
“If at first you don't succeed, cheat, repeat until caught, then lie.” -Anomymous
Satyrquaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 05:41 PM   #73
malchya
Lieutenant Commander
 
malchya's Avatar
 
Location: Olympia, WA
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

The Enterprise took a pounding, right down to ejecting the warp cores. This could easily explain changes to engineering. Heck, I hoped it would be used to explain some external design fixes that would improve the appearance and reception of the new ship.

And did I misread your tone, or are you trolling for a fracas? This is all personal preference and opinion and I am tired of it degenerating into a p*****g contest. That's why I avoided the board for about two months.
malchya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 06:01 PM   #74
Satyrquaze
Vice Admiral
 
Satyrquaze's Avatar
 
Location: Satyrquaze
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

Trolling isn't my intent. My apologies of it sounded that way. I do get annoyed at fans (like the one in the OP) who blindly level the same tired arguments that could be leveled at any of the Star Trek films and most of American cinema of the last 20 years for that matter.

You do make a good point about the amount of damage, but I don't know that the damage excuse would wash as she took comparable damage in TMP and more damage in TWoK with little signifigant cosmetic change (Not that there was time to make chages between II & III).
__________________
“If at first you don't succeed, cheat, repeat until caught, then lie.” -Anomymous
Satyrquaze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 06:13 PM   #75
Flying Spaghetti Monster
Vice Admiral
 
Flying Spaghetti Monster's Avatar
 
Location: Flying Spaghetti Western
Re: 15 Reasons JJ "Ruined & Destroyed" Star Trek

KingDaniel wrote: View Post
I think he meant "functional"
yes that's what I meant, thank you!

that's what I get for posting with a super intense sinus headache!
__________________
See, the problem is that you are using your cards to show me what cards you have, and if you can't see that this is viciously circular, then there is no point in continuing
Flying Spaghetti Monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.