|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
At the very least if the Bog were going to break off of their plan by abandoning an attack on the "modern" Earth of the TNG days, they could have at least waited until they had flown back towards the Delta and then pulled their time travelling stunt once they were out of view of the Federation. Its a flaw some of us have been pointing out since the far away days of the ST AOL forums. ![]() Of course VOY made it worse by giving us a glimpse of the hundreds of cubes the Borg appeared to have at their disposal. So why send one to attack Earth? Especially considering it carried a very important piece, albeit contrived, cargo in the form of The Queen.
__________________
You will be missed, Richard Biggs 1961 - too soon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
--DonIago It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek... "If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!" |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Writer
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
Of course, Voyager destroying the Borg's transwarp hub and Unicomplex would've changed that, raising the Federation from a source of curiosity and a minor nuisance to the level of a major threat. And in the Destiny trilogy in the novels, we see what happens when the Borg really do make the Federation their priority. As I see it, the Queen isn't really a person, just sort of a coordinating nexus for the collective consciousness. The physical body is just a substrate for what's basically a software entity. So any individual Queen body is expendable. If one is destroyed, a new one has the Queen software downloaded into it.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Updated 5/28/13 with discussion of Rise of the Federation Book 1. Written Worlds -- My blog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: In your Mind!
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
Make it so... |
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Captain
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
"Thank you.. for the drinks." |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||
|
Commodore
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Admiral
Location: Behind the aft nacelle
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
You yourself answered the OP's question perfectly: Not exactly constructive either, but I definitely agree with what you said, and it's a perfect example of the kind of lazy, dumb writing that I'm talking about.
__________________
"Thank you.. for the drinks." Last edited by Mr_Homn; October 11 2012 at 05:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: FC plothole? Why didn't the Borg create the vortex in the Delta Q?
What's more I thought the Borg were smart; I thought they adapted. They lost to the Federation once when sending one cube in the Federation's direction so what did they do the second time they decided to target Earth? They sent one single cube again. Ridiculous. Of course to be completely fair that decision of theirs only took on the ultimate level of stupidity AFTER Star Trek: VOY went overkill by establishing that the Borg had hundreds of cubes at its disposal. You don't have to be a standout in math to realize that the Borg could probably afford to send a few more cubes in the First Contact film. The Borg sent ten times that much simply to take on Voyager and its crew. And what does distance have to do with anything? The Borg are all about conquering other races and other societies, adding the conquered's technology to their own collection. By definition the Borg live to seek out new worlds and overtake them. That means lots and lots and lots of travelling. Distance isn't an issue but conquest is a priority...which makes any distance tey have to travel worthwhile.
__________________
You will be missed, Richard Biggs 1961 - too soon |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.





















