RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,707
Posts: 5,214,028
Members: 24,207
Currently online: 835
Newest member: MaileDetty


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How would you rate Dredd?
Excellent 40 50.63%
Good 30 37.97%
Average 4 5.06%
A bit poor 3 3.80%
Awful 2 2.53%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 8 2012, 05:16 AM   #121
Zod
Commander
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Location: NY
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Ok I saw it on Thursday and loved it. It was a very good movie.

So lets discuss why such a good movie has tanked at the box office. This time of year is usually a slow time but this movie has made next to nothing.

I read last week how 3D is not doing so well so that's where my guess will go as to why this movie has tanked. Since this movie did not have a 2D option correct? (In this area all the times seem to be for 3d and no 2d option was available) I know they charge more for 3d and so maybe that along with releasing the movie this time of year has done this film no favors.

Edit: Ahh I see an above poster did see it in 2d. I wonder why they didn't even offer that around here.
Zod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 05:45 AM   #122
Base_Delta_Zero
Commodore
 
Base_Delta_Zero's Avatar
 
Location: Maine
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Yeah, I was able to find ONE afternoon showing in 2D 3 towns over. Friends in New York and DC had similar issues finding 2D showings at reasonable distances and times. Calling it Dredd 3D started things off at a huge disadvantage, then they hid the 2D versions like easter eggs. A majority of 2D showings, with limited 3Ds sprinkled in and taking 3D out of the title would have greatly improved box office.
Base_Delta_Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 09:29 AM   #123
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Dredd really is the victim of a horrible vicious circle. They got the funding in part on the back of it having to be a 3D film, but by pushing the 3D element so much they've likely lost revenue.

I'd like to hope if nothing else comes out of this (like a sequel) then at least it might make some in Hollywood think twice about 3D...but then if it weren't for the 3D we quite probably wouldn't have got a great (if unsuccesful) Dredd film at all.

It all makes my head hurt!
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Captain America:TWS review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 09:38 AM   #124
Bob The Skutter
Admiral
 
Bob The Skutter's Avatar
 
Location: Bob The Skutter
View Bob The Skutter's Twitter Profile
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Wibbly wobbly fundy wundy?
__________________
And their call for war on poverty is a smokescreen we don't need, cos the only war worth fighting for is a war on their pure greed. : Acid Country - Paul Heaton
Bob The Skutter is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 10:03 AM   #125
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Winnie The Pooh wrote: View Post
Wibbly wobbly fundy wundy?
Something like that
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Captain America:TWS review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 02:02 PM   #126
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Zod wrote: View Post
Ok I saw it on Thursday and loved it. It was a very good movie.

So lets discuss why such a good movie has tanked at the box office. This time of year is usually a slow time but this movie has made next to nothing.

I read last week how 3D is not doing so well so that's where my guess will go as to why this movie has tanked. Since this movie did not have a 2D option correct? (In this area all the times seem to be for 3d and no 2d option was available) I know they charge more for 3d and so maybe that along with releasing the movie this time of year has done this film no favors.

Edit: Ahh I see an above poster did see it in 2d. I wonder why they didn't even offer that around here.
There's defintiely a 2D option, I saw it in 2D. But, really when it comes to 3D movies, 2D screenings are rather hit and miss. A lot of the time theatres don't bother with 2D and when they do, they make it very inconvenient to catch a 2D showing. In fact it's only been in the past few months that theatres in my area have been making an effort to make 2D more convenient. Which is good for me, because I was starting to hike out of area for 2D movies.

But as for why Dredd is failing at the box office, it has long been my cynical opinion that the greater masses simply don't like good movies. They'll flock to see Twilight, Abrams Trek, Transformers, but give them something of quality and substance and they don't want anything to do with it. Of course, this thinking conveniently ignores all the good movies that have been out that have brought in decent money.

Another possibility if you want to be simplistic is that there were no real recognizable actors in the movie. I imagine conversations went like this:
"What about Dredd?"
"I don't know. Who's in it?"
"Some guy named Karl Urban."
"Who's he?"
"I don't know."
"Wasn't he in Star Wars or something?"
"You know what, this one's got the girl from The Hunger Games, let's go see that."
Again, a weak argument that can be easily proven wrong, but I'm sure there's a contributing factor.

Like you say, September is a slow time for movies, indeed in my area the theatres are only open during the evenings now, and there isn't much of a crowd.

And finally, it's possible the Stallone movie may have tarnished the reputation of the Judge Dredd franchise, even seventeen years later.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 06:17 PM   #127
Admiral2
Vice Admiral
 
Admiral2's Avatar
 
Location: Tokyo Bay
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

The Wormhole wrote: View Post
Zod wrote: View Post
Ok I saw it on Thursday and loved it. It was a very good movie.

So lets discuss why such a good movie has tanked at the box office. This time of year is usually a slow time but this movie has made next to nothing.

I read last week how 3D is not doing so well so that's where my guess will go as to why this movie has tanked. Since this movie did not have a 2D option correct? (In this area all the times seem to be for 3d and no 2d option was available) I know they charge more for 3d and so maybe that along with releasing the movie this time of year has done this film no favors.

Edit: Ahh I see an above poster did see it in 2d. I wonder why they didn't even offer that around here.
There's defintiely a 2D option, I saw it in 2D. But, really when it comes to 3D movies, 2D screenings are rather hit and miss. A lot of the time theatres don't bother with 2D and when they do, they make it very inconvenient to catch a 2D showing. In fact it's only been in the past few months that theatres in my area have been making an effort to make 2D more convenient. Which is good for me, because I was starting to hike out of area for 2D movies.

But as for why Dredd is failing at the box office, it has long been my cynical opinion that the greater masses simply don't like good movies. They'll flock to see Twilight, Abrams Trek, Transformers, but give them something of quality and substance and they don't want anything to do with it. Of course, this thinking conveniently ignores all the good movies that have been out that have brought in decent money.

Another possibility if you want to be simplistic is that there were no real recognizable actors in the movie. I imagine conversations went like this:
"What about Dredd?"
"I don't know. Who's in it?"
"Some guy named Karl Urban."
"Who's he?"
"I don't know."
"Wasn't he in Star Wars or something?"
"You know what, this one's got the girl from The Hunger Games, let's go see that."
Again, a weak argument that can be easily proven wrong, but I'm sure there's a contributing factor.

Like you say, September is a slow time for movies, indeed in my area the theatres are only open during the evenings now, and there isn't much of a crowd.

And finally, it's possible the Stallone movie may have tarnished the reputation of the Judge Dredd franchise, even seventeen years later.
Or, a movie where half his face is obscured for the entire time turned off some people that might have come to actually see Karl Urban and not just a helmet.
__________________
"YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHRRRRRRRRORRRUNNK!"

-Godzilla, King Of The Monsters
Admiral2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 07:48 PM   #128
Reverend
Rear Admiral
 
Reverend's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

I think the lacklustre promotion may be a more significant factor than the lack of star power. While there were two trailers and a bunch of bts videos, it all came in a bit of a rush not long before the film was released. That plus for those not closely following the film, it flew pretty far under the radar with none of the kind of viral marketing that can raise awareness of the film. To top it all off, I only saw a few TV spots for the first two or three days after release. Didn't notice any billboards, posters or the like. While I'll be the first to complain about omnipresent advertising, it does make a difference.

I'm assuming the advertising budget just wasn't that substantial, probably because the film wasn't expected to do very well (hence the release date) which of course can often become a self fulfilling prophecy. Add to that the 18 certificate and some possible audience 3D fatigue...the odds were alway stacked against this one.

Personally though, I'd take one *good* film over a whole franchise of creatively compromised ones.

Last edited by Reverend; October 8 2012 at 08:00 PM.
Reverend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 08:04 PM   #129
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

It probably hasn't helped the film (which I haven't seen) that it was released in September, a traditional dumping ground for movies the studios have little confidence in. On top of that, the reviews were fair, but not great. On top of that, as noted, the film doesn't have any major stars (Karl Urban, although he has been in several high profile releases, hasn't been the star of anything successful as far as I know) and wasn't especially well-promoted.

I'm not sure I buy the backlash against 3D argument, although I would be happy if it were true.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 08:05 PM   #130
Set Harth
Rear Admiral
 
Set Harth's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey Falls
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

If 3D is actually driving people away, that is a good thing. Eventually the studios will have to take notice.
__________________
"In the future... do I make it?"
"No."
Set Harth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 08:22 PM   #131
Zod
Commander
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Location: NY
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Here is an interesting article on the subject of what went wrong:

5 reasons on why it tanked.

http://whatculture.com/film/dredd-3d...box-office.php
Zod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 09:17 PM   #132
OdoWanKenobi
Ring Slinger
 
OdoWanKenobi's Avatar
 
Location: Mogo
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Marketing certainly played a part. My friends and I are all pretty film savvy, and I was the only person in our group that even knew the film existed.
__________________
"In Brightest Day, in Blackest Night, no evil shall escape my sight. Let those who worship evil's might, beware my power: Green Lantern's light!"
OdoWanKenobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 10:00 PM   #133
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Reverend wrote: View Post

Personally though, I'd take one *good* film over a whole franchise of creatively compromised ones.
Amen Reverend

I still don't think the game's quite over, films have tanked before yet proven succesful enough on the rental market to justify another go, and I really do think--as many have said-- that Dredd will do well on DVD. Let's face it, the second Riddick movie cost a lot more, and probably tanked just as bad, yet there is going to be a third because in part the second did good in the rental market.

Never say never...
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Captain America:TWS review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 10:36 PM   #134
Harvey
Admiral
 
Harvey's Avatar
 
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

The Chronicles of Riddick cost $105 million, and grossed $115.77 million worldwide. It certainly wasn't the breakout hit the studio was looking for, but it probably recouped its losses with home video, streaming, and television. Vin Diesel's resurgence in popularity in the Fast & Furious franchise eventually resulted in the third film (currently in post-production), but at a much-reduced budget ($38 million).

Dredd cost $50 million, and so far has grossed $22.79 million worldwide. It's got a ways to go before it recoups its budget. If it sells well on home video, and Karl Urban has a career boost in a few years, it might warrant a sequel, but I'd say the chances are pretty slim. It almost certainly won't get the bigger-budgeted sequel that the filmmakers had in mind.
__________________
"This begs explanation." - de Forest Research on Star Trek

My blog: Star Trek Fact Check.
Harvey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9 2012, 01:14 AM   #135
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: Dredd - Grade, Review, Discuss, Spoilers

Admiral2 wrote: View Post
Or, a movie where half his face is obscured for the entire time turned off some people that might have come to actually see Karl Urban and not just a helmet.
Of course, the other side of the coin, seventeen years after the fact and fans are still bitching that Stallone took the helmet off. Hell, the helmet is such a focal point, that practically everything I've seen discussing the movie, stuff on the internet, magazines, on TV all go out of their way to point out that Urban keeps the helmet on.

And no offense to Karl Urban, like I said in my review post he owns the role of Dredd and his portrayal of Dr. McCoy is one of Trek XI's few highlights, but is he really famous enough that enough people saying "I won't see this movie because he keeps his helmet on and we never see his face" would make a serious enough dent in the ticket sales?
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
judge dredd

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.