|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | ||
|
Commodore
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
|
||
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
In Alpha-to-Alpha fights such as "Way of the Warrior", the lack of visible shield bubbles doesn't create obvious contradictions. It still takes an enjoyable fireworks show of four torpedoes to gut a Klingon battle cruiser, even if the powerful phaser beams of the station are the first to demonstrate the ability to kill a small BoP with one shot. (And that really is a small BoP - among the smallest in Trek history, at least in the shot where these fly in formation with a Vor'Cha.) Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
Yet Robau's crew never seemed to think that firing back at the projectiles would be necessary - it was a shock that the shields did not handle the threat. So there might be no culture of active defenses in Starfleet despite the demonstrated capacity. And when the weapons were used, admittedly by a badly damaged ship, they proved quite unsuccessful. They were 100% successful against threats directed at a third party (shuttles in teaser, Spock in climax), though. Perhaps this sort of defense really is useful only against inferior threats, and the TOS examples and STXI aren't that different in the end? Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
I've actually been sort of pondering two things from STXI. 1) Could/should we re-imagine "shields" from being a skin-covering forcefield and change it into the name of Starfleet's standard CIWS system? That would certainly explain the lack of visible shield flares in the movie and the fact that Kelvin continues to fire phasers even after the engineer tells Robau their weapons are offline. 2) Narada's torpedoes are described as "powerful and advanced" but there doesn't otherwise seem to be anything special bout them other than the clusterbomb trick. Maybe that singular innovation IS the thing that makes them powerful after all? Certainly WE'VE never seen anything like it in Trek, and Kelvin's engineer might be referring to the fact that Narada's single torpedo blew through his engine room in about a dozen different places at once where a normal torpedo only would have hit one spot and been quickly bottled up by STI fields.
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | ||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
Also, the Kelvin crew wonders if their shields were even up after Nero makes such short work of their ship in the first attack. How could they not know whether the CIWS system was up or not, when the bridge has an actual see-through window opening to the very lightshow that this CIWS system created?
Timo Saloniemi |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | ||||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
As to the TOS Enterprise firing phasers to knock down incoming missiles I forgot to list "Balance of Terror" where they fired at the last second to detonate the Romulan warhead. That same episode suggested a phaser strike against the plasma weapon as well to detonate it. We've also seen the E-D take out a Ferengi missile that was fired at the Barzan wormhole (IIRC). Oh, and in TMP, the Klingons tried shooting down V'ger's energy weapon with their own photon torpedoes. What we've not seen though is an explicit defensive phaser fire against incoming photon torpedoes. Perhaps photon torpedoes are too difficult to destroy with phaser or disruptor fire? Wasn't there an episode where they fired photon torpedoes into a star and the casings protected the warhead up till when it was needed to explode? |
|
|
|
|
#70 | |||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
There are a couple of good arguments for saying that the shields of STXI are not forcefields, at least not of the usual Trek sort. Namely, they never a) flare up visually at impact b) visibly protect from kinetic impact, be it at high or low speed, a weapons hit or a bump, or c) prevent transporting. On the other hand, the largest shuttle type is said to have shielding, yet is very unlikely to feature CIWS cannon in any of its incarnations. Robau twice orders power to shields, first when weapons are said to be offline, and next when no fighting is going on, in both cases suggesting that the weapons are not the shields (and never mind the separate terminology!). Pike in turn orders shields up when arriving at Vulcan but never gets any CIWS results of any sort out of it. Nero's first hit reduces shields but involves no CIWS activity. And Pike's officer refers to "deflector shields" as the thing that was tested by Sulu's bumping into jetsam - interestingly, the thing that failed to prevent scraping and physical damage despite "holding". All in all, then, CIWS is unlikely to be the same as shields in that universe, and it remains debatable if a separate CIWS system even exists; possibly it is just a mode for operating the generic (if two-tier) weaponry of the Kelvin. Timo Saloniemi |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
It would still be a desperate last grasp at a particularly thin straw, only made worth the try when Kirk realized shields were not going to get up any time soon. In the nebula, there would be no shields. But there would be no way to target anything much, either - Khan even missed a starship-sized target at twenty paces! The best defense against incoming torps in that soup would be to stay vewy vewy quiet and hope the enemy finds nothing to aim at. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
The torpedo passed within a few feet of the warp nacelle pylon and under the saucer hull before detonating. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
Whether Kirk could see this from the flightpath of the torpedo and appropriately hold fire... A bit unlikely, I'd say. But if shields are the proper way to stop torpedoes, and you waste power on CIWS only if shields aren't an option, then this would be a time for Kirk to hold fire anyway. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Mentone
|
Re: Federation Law of restricting cloaking device
__________________
You perceive wrongly. I feel unimaginable happiness wasting time talking with women. I'm that type of human. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















