RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,126
Posts: 5,401,300
Members: 24,745
Currently online: 629
Newest member: lafzsurat

TrekToday headlines

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Retro Watches
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 22 2012, 05:57 AM   #46
DAYoung
Commander
 
DAYoung's Avatar
 
Location: Melbourne, AUS
View DAYoung's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

I know little of the behind-the-scenes guff, but Insurrection was a poor film, and turned many film-goers--fans and otherwise--off the franchise.

Star Trek has always been prone to wooden acting, clumsy dialogue, rushed plotting, limited character development and awful mawkishness.

Generations and First Contact had bits of these, but they were balanced by fun, action, better-than-average scripts and acting, or workable plots.

Insurrection had most of the vices with few of the virtues. Dull characters, sentimental plotting, ham-fisted characterisation, flat dialogue.

We know Frakes was capable of much better. Perhaps he did his best with a poor script, little studio enthusiasm. I don't know.

Having said all this, the films' takings, adjusted for inflation, put ST: TMP and ST: TVH under Abrams' 2009 film. Which is odd, as they were not, in my opinion, superior to ST: TWK or ST: TUC.
__________________
philosopher & author
www.damonyoung.com.au
Out December 2012: Philosophy in the Garden
DAYoung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22 2012, 11:29 AM   #47
wahwahkits
Commander
 
Location: England, somewhere between Liverpool and Chester
View wahwahkits's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

DAYoung wrote: View Post
I know little of the behind-the-scenes guff, but Insurrection was a poor film, and turned many film-goers--fans and otherwise--off the franchise.

Star Trek has always been prone to wooden acting, clumsy dialogue, rushed plotting, limited character development and awful mawkishness.

Generations and First Contact had bits of these, but they were balanced by fun, action, better-than-average scripts and acting, or workable plots.

Insurrection had most of the vices with few of the virtues. Dull characters, sentimental plotting, ham-fisted characterisation, flat dialogue.

We know Frakes was capable of much better. Perhaps he did his best with a poor script, little studio enthusiasm. I don't know.

Having said all this, the films' takings, adjusted for inflation, put ST: TMP and ST: TVH under Abrams' 2009 film. Which is odd, as they were not, in my opinion, superior to ST: TWK or ST: TUC.
It also seemed to me that no-one could be bothered, everything seemed so laid back. At least with Nemesis they tried to make a decent movie.
wahwahkits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 22 2012, 11:55 AM   #48
NrobbieC
Commander
 
NrobbieC's Avatar
 
Location: Burton, UK
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
NrobbieC wrote: View Post
Dream wrote: View Post
Also a bad captain that keeps getting beat up and captured.
Archer's still better than Kirk.
James Kirk would have beat up and captured Archer.

What happens on the holodeck stays on the holodeck.
NrobbieC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 01:11 PM   #49
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

T'Girl wrote: View Post
NrobbieC wrote: View Post
Dream wrote: View Post
Also a bad captain that keeps getting beat up and captured.
Archer's still better than Kirk.
James Kirk would have beat up and captured Archer.

NuKirk vs. Archer would be funny. They'd both somehow manage to get their asses handed to them.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 01:33 PM   #50
Mage
Commodore
 
Mage's Avatar
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

People loosing interest in Star Trek is what killed it.

Ratings and interest were already dropping sooner then Insurrection and Enterprise. It's so simple to point a finger at one series, or one movie, and blame that. But it's not as simple.

Insurrection, strangly enough, was far more Star Trek/TNG then First Contact was. Wether or not you agree with it, it had a moral dilemma. Not a very strong one, but still. It tried to resolve issues without boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers before adding boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers. First Contact had 2-dimensional bad guys and far more action then any Trek film to date. The plot itself could have been a generic SF/Action flick, and didn't particulary scream Star Trek.

No, blaming Insurrection is a simple answer to a difficult question. What killed Star Trek, was a franchise that was stuck and unwilling to change its format to a more 21st century way of tv. They wanted to, with a fresh new concept for Enterprise, but ultimatly that was just Voyager Redux. And Voyager was also stuck in repeat mode, doing the same thing over and over again.
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat.
Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 03:30 PM   #51
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

Mage wrote: View Post
People loosing interest in Star Trek is what killed it.

Ratings and interest were already dropping sooner then Insurrection and Enterprise. It's so simple to point a finger at one series, or one movie, and blame that. But it's not as simple.

Insurrection, strangly enough, was far more Star Trek/TNG then First Contact was. Wether or not you agree with it, it had a moral dilemma. Not a very strong one, but still. It tried to resolve issues without boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers before adding boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers. First Contact had 2-dimensional bad guys and far more action then any Trek film to date. The plot itself could have been a generic SF/Action flick, and didn't particulary scream Star Trek.

No, blaming Insurrection is a simple answer to a difficult question. What killed Star Trek, was a franchise that was stuck and unwilling to change its format to a more 21st century way of tv. They wanted to, with a fresh new concept for Enterprise, but ultimatly that was just Voyager Redux. And Voyager was also stuck in repeat mode, doing the same thing over and over again.

The Borg, time travel, and space battles don't seem like Star Trek to you?


And how did INS resolve it's issues without "boomboom" and "light shows?" The second half of INS is mostly an action movie, complete with Picard/Ru'afo fight at the end.

The only Trek movies to not follow that formula are TMP, TVH, and (arguably) TFF. All of the TNG movies were action movies. INS was no more cerebral than FC, and the story was a lot stupider, including the lame dilemma.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 04:41 PM   #52
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

KingDaniel wrote: View Post
T'Girl wrote: View Post
NrobbieC wrote: View Post
Archer's still better than Kirk.
James Kirk would have beat up and captured Archer.

NuKirk vs. Archer would be funny. They'd both somehow manage to get their asses handed to them.
So true!
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 05:13 PM   #53
NrobbieC
Commander
 
NrobbieC's Avatar
 
Location: Burton, UK
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

KingDaniel wrote: View Post
NuKirk vs. Archer would be funny. They'd both somehow manage to get their asses handed to them.
I'm too dirty minded for this conversation
NrobbieC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 06:23 PM   #54
Mage
Commodore
 
Mage's Avatar
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

sonak wrote: View Post
Mage wrote: View Post
People loosing interest in Star Trek is what killed it.

Ratings and interest were already dropping sooner then Insurrection and Enterprise. It's so simple to point a finger at one series, or one movie, and blame that. But it's not as simple.

Insurrection, strangly enough, was far more Star Trek/TNG then First Contact was. Wether or not you agree with it, it had a moral dilemma. Not a very strong one, but still. It tried to resolve issues without boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers before adding boomboomboom and fancy lightshows from phasers. First Contact had 2-dimensional bad guys and far more action then any Trek film to date. The plot itself could have been a generic SF/Action flick, and didn't particulary scream Star Trek.

No, blaming Insurrection is a simple answer to a difficult question. What killed Star Trek, was a franchise that was stuck and unwilling to change its format to a more 21st century way of tv. They wanted to, with a fresh new concept for Enterprise, but ultimatly that was just Voyager Redux. And Voyager was also stuck in repeat mode, doing the same thing over and over again.

The Borg, time travel, and space battles don't seem like Star Trek to you?


And how did INS resolve it's issues without "boomboom" and "light shows?" The second half of INS is mostly an action movie, complete with Picard/Ru'afo fight at the end.

The only Trek movies to not follow that formula are TMP, TVH, and (arguably) TFF. All of the TNG movies were action movies. INS was no more cerebral than FC, and the story was a lot stupider, including the lame dilemma.

Turn the Borg into 'a cybernetic alien race' and the rest could be any SF story.

From the first moments of FC, everything was about action. Only during the second half of INS, did Picard resolve to fighting. He tried diplomacy, he tried talking. He only used violence as a last resort. He talked to Galatin, instead of kicking his ass, reasoning with him. The Enterprise only fired it's phasers twice I believe.

And the dilemma is, in my humble opinion, far from stupid. Why? Because even now, more then a decade later, we are still discussing it, with different opinions flying back and forth. I'd say that's what Star Trek was all about, no??
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat.
Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 06:46 PM   #55
t_smitts
Commander
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

I gotta say, I think Insurrection gets a bit of a bum rap. It's certainly nowhere near Nemesis.

I liked the performances by F. Murray Abraham, Anthony Zerbe, and Gregg Henry.

I liked the shuttlecraft chase as well. It's no "First Contact", but I'd say on par with "Generations" and, again, considerably better than "Nemesis"
t_smitts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 06:54 PM   #56
wahwahkits
Commander
 
Location: England, somewhere between Liverpool and Chester
View wahwahkits's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

t_smitts wrote: View Post
I gotta say, I think Insurrection gets a bit of a bum rap. It's certainly nowhere near Nemesis.

I liked the performances by F. Murray Abraham, Anthony Zerbe, and Gregg Henry.

I liked the shuttlecraft chase as well. It's no "First Contact", but I'd say on par with "Generations" and, again, considerably better than "Nemesis"
Can't say I agree with you there... Nemesis ain't a classic but for me it's better than Insurrection.
wahwahkits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 08:03 PM   #57
horatio83
Commodore
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

The worst thing one can say about INS is that it is TNG's TFF, a movie which tried to resemble the series too much and failed precisely because it did not dare to be something different (in the case of TFF it was the cheesiness of TOS, in the case of INS the Picard vs. the evil Admiral moral tale of TNG).
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger
horatio83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 23 2012, 08:46 PM   #58
t_smitts
Commander
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

wahwahkits wrote: View Post
t_smitts wrote: View Post
I gotta say, I think Insurrection gets a bit of a bum rap. It's certainly nowhere near Nemesis.

I liked the performances by F. Murray Abraham, Anthony Zerbe, and Gregg Henry.

I liked the shuttlecraft chase as well. It's no "First Contact", but I'd say on par with "Generations" and, again, considerably better than "Nemesis"
Can't say I agree with you there... Nemesis ain't a classic but for me it's better than Insurrection.
I found no investment in the idea of an insane Picard clone, nor in his desire to destroy Earth (been there, done that).

If conflict had been between the Romulans and Remans themselves, it might've something more original.

I probably consider Nemesis to be the weakest of all the films. Even TMP had some interesting moments, and Final Frontier at least had some camp value.
t_smitts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 27 2012, 04:36 PM   #59
VOODOOXI
Commander
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

There wasn't one thing that killed the TNG film franchise, but Insurrection did not help. It was a rather bland film that would have been better suited as a TNG tv episode rather than a major motion picture. There was nothing cinematic about it.

Beyond being a bland film it was quite frankly a terrible film that imho is the worst of all the ST films thus far.

Also, at the point that Insurection was released the Star Trek franchise was suffering severe over saturation. There just wasn't anything special enough about this story that would make fans run out to the theatre to see it when they could get ST for free at home.

The TNG films in general with the possible exception of "First Contact" were not big/epic enough to carry a film franchise. Instead of kicking off the film franchise with the depressing death obsessed "Generations" TPTB should have kicked the TNG film franchise off with a fun action adventure film that involved the TOS meeting the TNG crew and a proper passing the torch in a manner that would have fired up the fanbase...Instead we got a totally forced cameo by William Shatner where Kirk is killed off for no reason in particular. As a matter of fact Generations didn't bring the fanbase together it did the exact opposite by killng off Kirk and minimizing TOS fans (It's no coincedence that when the series needed to be saved they went back to Kirk/Spock) Generations was too depressing and polarizing a film to kick off the TNG film franchise.

First Contact was a step in the right direction, but Insurrection and Nemesis with their corny story lines (B4, Data, Picard, Worf singing etc) were just horrible and the final nail in the coffin of the series.

I hope the TNG series gets a better ending someday. Perhaps a tv mini series or film.
VOODOOXI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8 2012, 11:43 PM   #60
mos6507
Captain
 
mos6507's Avatar
 
Re: Did Insurrection kill the TNG franchise?

Nemesis I think was intended as the TNG equivalent of VI, a proper farewell, not a comeback with more sequels to follow. The difference, besides the quality which we all know is subjective, is that in VI, Paramount gave it a very small budget (I heard Meyer had to fight for every penny) and Nemesis got a blank-check. So right from the start they raised the stakes so that the film had to pull James Cameron style numbers when the franchise was clearly dying after suffering the dud of insurrection and then waiting 4 years.

When I found out Nemesis was coming out I was shocked, because usually it doesn't take that long to have a sequel. The franchise was clearly dead for a while and there was some sea-change at the studio that made them want to resurrect it one last time, but you can't just let a franchise wither like that and then raise the Titanic.

So I think the odds were against it ever being seen as a success on the part of the studio, even if it had been rated as highly as VI.
__________________
Fem Trekz on Facebook
mos6507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.