Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? - Page 8

Neumann · September 11 2012, 02:07 PM

It will also depend on how,they handlemthe story, thr more compelling and smart, the better it will be.

SalvorHardin · September 11 2012, 08:22 PM

Several sites now report that Paramount has officially confirmed the title as Star Trek Into Darkness.

The Keeper · September 11 2012, 08:53 PM

Cue additional staffing at the Suicide Prevention Lifelines.

It's grown on me. Seeing the fan made banners of it has helped solidify it as a more potentially viable title, than seeing it in simple plain print.

teacake · September 11 2012, 10:45 PM

So I'm wondering if it took a cue from McCoy's line in the first movie.

Though I don't think we'll ever get Star Trek Into Disease.

Lord Garth, FOI · September 13 2012, 11:33 PM

Yup those are the ones
Thanks

M'Sharak wrote:

Lord Garth, FOI wrote:

CorporalCaptain wrote:

I'm curious for a link, too.

Sorry brothers, no link
Saw it over at ain't it cool I believe after Latino review first confirmed it was khan. If you search trek over there maybe you can find it. Was reported by the guy there who first reported the destruction of Vulcan rumors

Maybe you're remembering this? In which:

Hercules @ AICN wrote:

Not a rehash of “Space Seed”?

A digression of pure speculation: What if Old Spock Prime dispatched a heavily armed crew to where he knew the Botany Bay would be drifting? What if Khan and his crew were (likely against Old Spock's protests) quickly caged and “broken” and repurposed into Starfleet Team Six, the Federation’s most deadly secret weapon? And what if this “tamed” Khan, with his genetically-engineered superior intelligence, has spent years biding his time as Starfleet puts more and more of its trust in him? End digression.

And also:

Hercules @ AICN wrote:

Another speculative digression occurs! What if the Klingons are utilized early on to demonstrate how badass Khan’s Starfleet Team Six is? (Recall a similar strategy was once employed to demonstrate how badass V’ger was.) Will we finally get to see a Khan-Klingon throwdown?

los2188 · September 14 2012, 03:09 AM

Spock/Uhura Fan wrote:

^ They might be going with 4 now since that last movie's abbreviation is ST09. This next one is going to be STID, I guess?

Hopefully it won't be known as STD.

Therin of Andor · September 17 2012, 03:23 PM

Agent Richard07 wrote:

As for Generations, I often see it spelled "Star Trek Generations" without the colon and I like it that way. It's quite appropriate, given that the movie covers two generations of Trek.

Way back when "Generations" was due for release, then-Star Trek Archivist at Paramount, Richard Arnold was telling conventions that the movie's title has no colon. Ditto all the media releases.

SeamusShameless · September 17 2012, 08:01 PM

The way I see it, even sans colon "Into Darkness" is a subtitle. It'll look silly if the title card reads "Star Trek Into Darkness" all in one line of text. I would imagine it'll be more along the lines of... "Star Trek"...fade to black..."Into Darkness". That'll work just fine.

ChristopherPike · September 17 2012, 08:08 PM

Hmmm. Hasn't it been given another new title yet?

Set Harth · September 17 2012, 11:57 PM

Therin of Andor wrote:

Agent Richard07 wrote:

As for Generations, I often see it spelled "Star Trek Generations" without the colon and I like it that way. It's quite appropriate, given that the movie covers two generations of Trek.

Way back when "Generations" was due for release, then-Star Trek Archivist at Paramount, Richard Arnold was telling conventions that the movie's title has no colon. Ditto all the media releases.

I'm not seeing a colon in this image...

Therin of Andor · September 18 2012, 11:48 AM

Set Harth wrote:

I'm not seeing a colon in this image...

Exactly, and when written in regular text it also has no colon.

StarMan · September 18 2012, 12:47 PM

SeamusShameless wrote:

The way I see it, even sans colon "Into Darkness" is a subtitle. It'll look silly if the title card reads "Star Trek Into Darkness" all in one line of text.

So, does it seem silly because "Star Trek" hasn't been phrased in this manner before? I find it has a peculiar ring to it, but that's why I like it. It's different and "Star Trek" is taken in a different context to the usual overarching franchise header.

Delsaber · September 19 2012, 12:32 AM

Star Trek Colon Into Darkness Movie Film For Theaters

I'm just glad no attempt is being made to number these things any more. I obsess over the organization of my shelves enough as it is.

CorporalClegg · September 19 2012, 12:40 AM

Delsaber wrote:

Star Trek Colon Into Darkness Movie Film For Theaters

I'm just glad no attempt is being made to number these things any more. I obsess over the organization of my shelves enough as it is.

In the end, people will be saying, "Star Trek Into Darkness may not have a colon, but it does deliver."

Crazy Eddie · September 20 2012, 06:04 AM

CorporalClegg wrote:

Delsaber wrote:

Star Trek Colon Into Darkness Movie Film For Theaters

I'm just glad no attempt is being made to number these things any more. I obsess over the organization of my shelves enough as it is.

In the end, people will be saying, "Star Trek Into Darkness may not have a colon...

... but it does have an anus, and it's name is Benedict Cumberbatch.

September 11 2012, 02:07 PM	#106
Neumann Captain Location: Caracas, Venezuela	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? It will also depend on how,they handlemthe story, thr more compelling and smart, the better it will be. __________________ It's all about canon being violated! ;-)

September 11 2012, 08:22 PM	#107
SalvorHardin Rear Admiral Location: Star's End	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Several sites now report that Paramount has officially confirmed the title as Star Trek Into Darkness. __________________ www.youtube.com/user/SalvorSeldon

September 11 2012, 08:53 PM	#108
The Keeper Commodore Location: Where reality ends and illusion begins	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Cue additional staffing at the Suicide Prevention Lifelines. It's grown on me. Seeing the fan made banners of it has helped solidify it as a more potentially viable title, than seeing it in simple plain print.

September 11 2012, 10:45 PM	#109
teacake Admiral Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? So I'm wondering if it took a cue from McCoy's line in the first movie. Though I don't think we'll ever get Star Trek Into Disease. __________________ Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne

September 17 2012, 08:01 PM	#113
SeamusShameless Commander Location: Donna, TX	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? The way I see it, even sans colon "Into Darkness" is a subtitle. It'll look silly if the title card reads "Star Trek Into Darkness" all in one line of text. I would imagine it'll be more along the lines of... "Star Trek"...fade to black..."Into Darkness". That'll work just fine. __________________ Bones: Jim, are you alright? How do you feel? Kirk: Young... I feel young.

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US

September 17 2012, 08:08 PM	#114
ChristopherPike Rear Admiral	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Hmmm. Hasn't it been given another new title yet? __________________ STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE Tribute ►http://youtu.be/myS87yTTDes

September 19 2012, 12:32 AM	#118
Delsaber Commodore Location: Parts Unknown	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Star Trek Colon Into Darkness Movie Film For Theaters I'm just glad no attempt is being made to number these things any more. I obsess over the organization of my shelves enough as it is. __________________ • Delsaber, The Punk Rock P'takh, from Parts Unknown... • Caffeine-Fueled: jittery, occasionally-maintained geek culture blogging.