RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 149,631
Posts: 5,950,399
Members: 26,496
Currently online: 471
Newest member: Battelle

TrekToday headlines

Borg Cube Part II
By: T'Bonz on Dec 1

Star Trek Mad Libs
By: T'Bonz on Dec 1

Lindelof: Star Trek Into Darkness Mistake
By: T'Bonz on Dec 1

What Would Captain Kirk Do?
By: T'Bonz on Nov 30

Koenig and Nichols To Join Excelsior Project
By: T'Bonz on Nov 30

Stewart In Christmas Eve
By: T'Bonz on Nov 30

Retro Review: Dreadnought
By: Michelle Erica Green on Nov 27

December 2015-January 2016 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

STO Community Supports Chase Masterson Charity
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Greenwood To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Thread Tools
Old September 10 2012, 07:03 PM   #16
sojourner's Avatar
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Safer Nuclear Technology

Yep, all the speed in the world won't save you if your trajectories intersect.
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2012, 05:11 AM   #17
Location: Kentucky
Re: Safer Nuclear Technology

Why would we even consider the expense of putting nuclear waste into low orbit, much less into the sun, when we could just dump it in New Jersey or East LA?
gturner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13 2012, 06:49 AM   #18
Rear Admiral
Gary7's Avatar
Location: Near Manhattan ··· in an alternate reality
Re: Safer Nuclear Technology

Personally, I think they ought to dump nuclear waste into lava pools. The material should get very well dispersed so as to significantly lower the radioactive intensity. There's plenty of active volcanos around, too. The only thing is, if you dump in the waste and there's an eruption shortly thereafter, it probably won't be good...

All kidding aside, the technology has come a long way and is really quite safe. The melt downs that have happened are very explainable. The recent one in Japan was obvious, as the generators should have been located further up the hill. They were supposed to relocate it, but the hesitation to make the expense caused them to delay... and look what happened. In my mind, it's a suitable source of energy to get us off of burning coal and oil, at least until passive energy systems (solar, wind, thermal, hydro) make better headway.
Remembering Ensign Mallory.
Gary7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 13 2012, 08:30 AM   #19
Rear Admiral
YellowSubmarine's Avatar
Re: Safer Nuclear Technology

I think they should just feed the radioactive waste to all those Vulcan refugees that our governments have been secretly accepting after trimming their ears. And then we should send them all back home. Earth for the earthlings.
Objects in mirror are bluer than they appear
YellowSubmarine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15 2012, 08:44 PM   #20
Rear Admiral
Re: Safer Nuclear Technology

Gary7 wrote: View Post
Personally, I think they ought to dump nuclear waste into lava pools.
No--that's no good either--it just keeps being vomited up. You really want it in a subduction zone, right where one plante dives down into another. Dig a trench just in front of a subsea cliff. The next big quake and the plate moves under that cliff--that or wait some number of years for gradual subduction. Seeing how difficult Deepwater Horizon operations were at depth--putting it on the moon is actually easier.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.