RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,677
Posts: 5,429,993
Members: 24,826
Currently online: 478
Newest member: ragster


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy > Stargate

Stargate Sir, we can't call it the Enterprise forum.

 
 
Thread Tools
Old September 11 2012, 03:45 PM   #1
Methos
First Officer: USS Aventine
 
Methos's Avatar
 
Location: Hiding under Gaila's bed...
View Methos's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Methos Send a message via Yahoo to Methos
Where should Stargate go now?

Ok, this is a pretty simple question on the surface, but actually think about it...

If you were in control of the Stargate franchise... where would you take it for a new show?

SG-1 was pretty amazing for 8 seasons, then died off in my opinion... and then Atlantis took the reigns and ran quite successfully for a while, while sadly, Stargate Voyager... ahem, Stargate: Universe, seemed to be doomed from the getgo...

So, where would you like to see Stargate go? I'm sure there's plenty more stories to be told in the Stargate mythos, so where would you take it?

M
__________________
In Russia, a 122 year old man has passed away, he credited his long life to abtaining from alcohol, tobacco and women. His last words were "I've made a huge mistake."
Methos is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 03:47 PM   #2
Lonemagpie
Writer
 
Lonemagpie's Avatar
 
Location: Yorkshire
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Timegate...
__________________
"I got two modes with people- Bite, and Avoid"
Reading: Wolfsangel (MD Lachlan)

Blog- http://lonemagpie.livejournal.com
Lonemagpie is online now  
Old September 11 2012, 03:59 PM   #3
marksound
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Planet Carcazed
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Stargate: NCIS.
marksound is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 04:05 PM   #4
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Paddling...
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Lonemagpie wrote: View Post
Timegate...
Sounds like some kind of Gallifreyan political scandal…
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Guardians of the Galaxy review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 04:09 PM   #5
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Well I would first dial up the stargate forum, Where I suspect this might be moved to.

As for the franchise as a whole. Might be better to just reset and star over.

As for SG:U if they had done a show more similiar to SG-1/SG:A and if it had still been cancelled after two seasons. We would be hearing cries of they should have tried something different. I didn't have an issue with SG:U sure it had weaker episodes what show doesn't. I like a bit of vareity in my shows.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 04:27 PM   #6
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Paddling...
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

I liked SG:U, they probably should have spent the first season getting to where they'd got by the middle of the second. Really the first season should have ended with them
.

Much as I liked all the SG shows, I'm not sure it should really come back in any format. I wouldn't want to see it rebooted, and all that leaves is returning to the universe and they'd just be doing more of the same.
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Guardians of the Galaxy review

The Devils of Amber Street
Starkers is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 04:53 PM   #7
Agent Richard07
Admiral
 
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Ideally, I'd revive SGU. I enjoyed the show and found the arc compelling enough that I think it's worth finishing. Failing an SGU revival, I'd still do something within the present continuity. I'm far more interested in what they've built over the last 15 years than I am in the Stargate concept itself. We've seen them go from a small team of explorers to a mini Earth empire. It'd be a shame to throw all that away.
Agent Richard07 is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 05:28 PM   #8
gturner
Admiral
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

I think Star Gate's problem was that they came to rely too heavily on the story arcs of the villains they ended up defeating and eliminating, or in the case of SGA, they depended too heavily on just one villain that was never well developed.

The writers basically shrunk their own universe, going from one of amazing potential, variety, and wonder in the early seasons to "Well, we're pretty much done here. Let's wrap this galaxy up."

The premise is still perfectly sound. We have a means of visiting an almost infinite number of planets so we can walk into an incredibly large number of situations, like a more rational version of Doctor Who or Torchwood.

With SGU they found a way to dispense with maintaining so much of the accumulated structure (the political complexities of Washington and the SGC), but also overly limited the show's freedom to just explore new planets by requiring each visit to have a narrow purpose. Then they re-introduced Washington complexities again, recomplicating things.
gturner is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 05:32 PM   #9
Kelthaz
Rear Admiral
 
Kelthaz's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Give it ten years and then reboot. Yes, I'm serious.

The whole continuity of the franchise has been fucked up beyond repair. Stargate was fun when it was a group of modern day humans struggling to deal with the advanced alien threats threatening them. Stargate started to suck when humans became the dominant force of the galaxy and more advanced than the Federation.

Yes, Earth needed to grow or else all of those missions SG-1 went on and the allies they made would be meaningless, but it was far too much and far too fast.
__________________
"Who are you?! And how did you get in here?!"

"I'm the locksmith. And... I'm the locksmith."
Kelthaz is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 05:49 PM   #10
Enterprise is Great
Rear Admiral
 
Enterprise is Great's Avatar
 
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

I'd make a feature film reboot and do it as a trilogy then base a series on what was established in the films.
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...ROCKED on May 17, 2013 and beyond!
Enterprise is Great is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 05:56 PM   #11
Rhaven
Captain
 
Rhaven's Avatar
 
Location: Rhaven in Boston
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Lonemagpie wrote: View Post
Timegate...
^
This.

Time travel back to the Ancients.
__________________
I'm not a geek, I'm an aficionado.
Rhaven is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 06:56 PM   #12
Temis the Vorta
Fleet Admiral
 
Temis the Vorta's Avatar
 
Location: Tatoinne
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

I'd reboot the whole thing and take a less cliched and gutsier approach. Basically, what they were trying to do with SGU but didn't have the ability to pull off well.

The right creative team could do it, nuBSG proved that. I might hire some of the nuBSG writing and production team, though I wouldn't want them to flat out imitate nuBSG. Stargate needs its own character.

I'd keep the idea of a military and scientific character to the Stargate program. The structure would be more serialized to bring in some ideas that go beyond what's possible in the mission of the week format, which has been done and then some.

The Goa'uld are a good basic villain type but I'd have them go far beyond bwahaha villainy. The Ancients also need work, to not be so damn boring. Ditto for the Replicators and Ori.

The Tok'ra have great potential to be a fascinating shades of grey type ally/enemy. There's lots more to be mined in the highly fraught Tau'ri-Tok'ra-Jaffa relationship. They barely scratched the surface of that. I might even bring back the Ri'tu, remember those guys?

Every element needs to be pushed further to get past the lazy-cliche level that Stargate stopped at, far too often.

Agent Richard07 wrote: View Post
I'm far more interested in what they've built over the last 15 years than I am in the Stargate concept itself.
I'm the opposite, I still think the premise is strong, but I watched SG1 and SGA almost all the way through, and as much of SGU as I could stand, and even with all that material, I don't give a flip about saving any if it. Toss it all and start over, with a creative team that is daring and has interesting ideas, and the freedom to take it anywhere they see fit.

Last edited by Temis the Vorta; September 11 2012 at 07:10 PM.
Temis the Vorta is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 07:50 PM   #13
gturner
Admiral
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

Well, would a major reboot be worth it, or would it be better to alter the premise? For example, the gate system has them stepping onto unknown alien worlds, but they can always just step back through the gate. So the writers have to give them a reason to either explore (find allies, technology, etc) or a reason they can't immediately leave via the gate they just came through (Damaged DHD's, etc). They also have to always arrive where the gate happens to be, and never know much about what lies beyond the gate's immediate area.

You could give each planet an in-gate and an out-gate and a reason why they can't be in close proximity (like a transmitting and receiving antenna on a radio repeater), and then each visit would inherently require some amount of cross-planet journeying. Unfortunately, a tweak that major would probably mean you'd need to tweak a whole lot of other things so that the show doesn't just look like a screwed up version of Stargate, like Wormhole Extreme.

You could mix premises of Stargate and ship-based shows, and instead of gating between planets, the gates take you to orbiting stations around the planets (which actually makes more technological sense, since geology would bury all the gates but high orbits last virtually forever). Each station would have to have a few shuttles on board (otherwise they'd have been useless), so the shuttles can be destroyed pretty frequently without creating the ST Voyager problem. It also eliminates the long travel times between planets that Star Trek had to occassionally comment on, along with the "assume standard orbit" type dialog that always ate up screen time.

Since the orbital stations were built in large numbers, they would look similar to each other (saving on set production), yet could've been modified by subsequent occupants or visitors (giving an excuse for visual variety and changes required by particular episodes, while explaining why the changes are mostly cosmetic - also saving production costs per episode). That would also allow many or most episodes to encounter aliens on an orbiting station instead of a planet, reducing the need for location shoots, yet always having a planet there if a story requires it.

The system of travel also means that the aliens on a station might often be different from the aliens on a particular planet, creating conflict and drama if the episode is a planetside scavenger hunt, and giving an in-built reason to find lots of aliens playing gods over more primitive planetary populations.

It's also logical that many stations that are still in operation (or were reoccupied) would've put a local gate on the nearby planet's surface (normally either not done or lost to geological processes), so a shuttle trip wouldn't be necessary for most episodes (Star Trek used transporters so they didn't have to keep burning screen time on shuttle arrivals and departures), and yet could be a feature of other episodes, without burning screen time explaining why the transporter won't work on a particular planet because of <technobabble>.

Since the stations are pretty standard and obviously built to monitor the planets they orbit, the whole "scan for ships/scan for lifesigns" can be dispensed with as needed, and a long-term history of each planet could often be recorded on the station, so the writers would have more versatility in revealing an episode's backstory.

ETA: (So for many episodes, the SGC briefing room scenes or ST ready-room scenes could move onto the station itself, with the station's records filling the role of a character).


Toss in Lonemagpie's Timegate idea, and perhaps some of the stations are locked to particularly critical points of a planet's history, giving a reason why episode after episode is unusually important to the characters in it, as opposed to yet another meaningless arrival of people at the planet's bus station.
gturner is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 07:53 PM   #14
Mistral
Vice Admiral
 
Mistral's Avatar
 
Location: Between the candle and the flame
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

gturner wrote: View Post
Well, would a major reboot be worth it, or would it be better to alter the premise? For example, the gate system has them stepping onto unknown alien worlds, but they can always just step back through the gate. So the writers have to give them a reason to either explore (find allies, technology, etc) or a reason they can't immediately leave via the gate they just came through (Damaged DHD's, etc). They also have to always arrive where the gate happens to be, and never know much about what lies beyond the gate's immediate area.

You could give each planet an in-gate and an out-gate and a reason why they can't be in close proximity (like a transmitting and receiving antenna on a radio repeater), and then each visit would inherently require some amount of cross-planet journeying. Unfortunately, a tweak that major would probably mean you'd need to tweak a whole lot of other things so that the show doesn't just look like a screwed up version of Stargate, like Wormhole Extreme.

You could mix premises of Stargate and ship-based shows, and instead of gating between planets, the gates take you to orbiting stations around the planets (which actually makes more technological sense, since geology would bury all the gates but high orbits last virtually forever). Each station would have to have a few shuttles on board (otherwise they'd have been useless), so the shuttles can be destroyed pretty frequently without creating the ST Voyager problem. It also eliminates the long travel times between planets that Star Trek had to occassionally comment on, along with the "assume standard orbit" type dialog that always ate up screen time.

Since the orbital stations were built in large numbers, they would look similar to each other (saving on set production), yet could've been modified by subsequent occupants or visitors (giving an excuse for visual variety and changes required by particular episodes, while explaining why the changes are mostly cosmetic - also saving production costs per episode). That would also allow many or most episodes to encounter aliens on an orbiting station instead of a planet, reducing the need for location shoots, yet always having a planet there if a story requires it.

The system of travel also means that the aliens on a station might often be different from the aliens on a particular planet, creating conflict and drama if the episode is a planetside scavenger hunt, and giving an in-built reason to find lots of aliens playing gods over more primitive planetary populations.

It's also logical that many stations that are still in operation (or were reoccupied) would've put a local gate on the nearby planet's surface (normally either not done or lost to geological processes), so a shuttle trip wouldn't be necessary for most episodes (Star Trek used transporters so they didn't have to keep burning screen time on shuttle arrivals and departures), and yet could be a feature of other episodes, without burning screen time explaining why the transporter won't work on a particular planet because of <technobabble>.

Since the stations are pretty standard and obviously built to monitor the planets they orbit, the whole "scan for ships/scan for lifesigns" can be dispensed with as needed, and a long-term history of each planet could often be recorded on the station, so the writers would have more versatility in revealing an episode's backstory.
You've thought about this, haven't you?
Me like.
__________________
...sf fandom is only a personality disorder if you do it right.-Klaus
http://www.adastrafanfic.com - archive stories! www.4rumboys.com for honest gaming

Mistral is offline  
Old September 11 2012, 08:03 PM   #15
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: Where should Stargate go now?

The first thing I would do is get rid of all the Medieval villages.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.