I want Data back...

[JD]

NrobbieC wrote:

---

Yeah it is haha. I didn't know that, then what is the opposite of disabled?

Able-bodied.

Relayer1 wrote:

---

Indeed. And disliking political correctness DOESN'T mean you're a bigot or an jerk...

Which is fine, as long as you're not being offensive. Just because you don't care, doesn't mean who you're talking to or about won't be offended by what you say. I've never been officially declared disabled, but I have struggled with medical problems for most of my life, so I tend to be very sympathetic to what disabled people go through and I take this stuff quite seriously.

[Saul]

Regardless of the moral and fan boy arguments it did seem to me that TWOK inspired 'Nemesis' was leaving the door open for Data to return if there was another sequel. Anyone disagree with that? Some cast and crew interviews suggest that also.

[JD]

I think it's pretty clear that was the intent. But we don't know for a fact they would have completely wiped B4 out to bring back Data. And even if that was the intent, it doesn't mean it was right or that the books should be required to find it.
EDIT: The more that I think about it, we can't even be sure that they would have brought back Data. The only reason to really bring him back would be to keep Brent Spiner around, but with B4 they already had a character for him. I'm sure they could have found ways to work B4 into a story.

[Therin of Andor]

NrobbieC wrote:

---

That and the Commander Madden and seat belts

Arex and Gabler had seatbelts almost a century earlier:


Seatbelts by Therin of Andor, on Flickr

[Christopher]

Saul wrote:

---

Regardless of the moral and fan boy arguments it did seem to me that TWOK inspired 'Nemesis' was leaving the door open for Data to return if there was another sequel. Anyone disagree with that? Some cast and crew interviews suggest that also.

Yes and no. The thing to remember is that there are different people and groups involved in making a movie, and so there can be more than one intent or purpose shaping its content. It was the studio's intent to include a back door so they could bring back Data if the movie was a hit and audiences clamored for Spiner's return. But that wasn't the intent of the people who came up with the story and script. Spiner wanted to kill off Data because he was getting too old to plausibly continue the role. His intention and his collaborators' intention was that it would be the end for Data, period. Within the context of the film as written, B-4's little song at the end is just Data's legacy, a ray of hope that B-4 can learn and grow after all thanks to what Data left him. Of course it has the secondary, backup purpose of being a potential back door for returning Data if that became an option. But that was a contingency plan, not the primary purpose of the plot development.

You see this a lot in fiction, especially collaborative fiction. A story is told with a certain primary goal in mind, but with just a bit of a hedge thrown in just in case future creators or changing circumstances lead to a change of goals. That doesn't mean, however, that the hedge represents the creators' original or primary intent. It's just a backup plan.

For instance, in DTI: Watching the Clock, I established a lot about the future of the Federation -- but I made sure to include a line hinting that maybe the future glimpsed there isn't the future, that there's a chance the whole thing could've been changed. That doesn't mean I intended that whole future to be non-binding; it just means that, whatever my own intentions, I recognize that I'm not the one in charge of the franchise and I have to leave some wiggle room in case other creators decided to take the continuity in an incompatible direction. If you're part of a collaborative creation, it's just good sense to leave in that kind of wiggle room -- not because you want or intend your decisions to be undone, but because you're aware that someone else may decide to undo them.

[King Daniel]

For whatever it's worth, Brent Spiner mentioned that in his "Justice League of Trek" Nemesis sequel, Data would have been saved via time travel, beamed off the Scimitar a split-second before it was destroyed.

[JarodRussell]

KingDaniel wrote:

---

For whatever it's worth, Brent Spiner mentioned that in his "Justice League of Trek" Nemesis sequel, Data would have been saved via time travel, beamed off the Scimitar a split-second before it was destroyed.

Good thing they didn't do a sequel then.


Nemesis is an alternate timeline movie that can be safely ignored anyway.