|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1516 | ||
|
Commodore
Location: Germany
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. |
||
|
|
|
|
#1517 |
|
Writer
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
So it makes no sense to continue clinging to this outdated myth that FOX is somehow hostile to genre shows. That myth has always been unfair; the only reason FOX has cancelled so many genre shows is because it's bought so many more genre shows than any other network, and most shows get cancelled quickly, period, on any network -- especially genre shows, which are usually more expensive to make and less likely to get strong ratings than non-genre shows. Look at the history of SF and fantasy shows on every television network and you'll see that their life expectancy on FOX was never any worse than it was anywhere else. And it's complete and utter nonsense to continue buying into the myth today, when FOX is clearly as dedicated to supporting genre shows as any network in television history has ever been. So seriously. Get the hell over Firefly already and let that kneejerk "FOX kills sci-fi" meme die its long-overdue death. In the context of current events, it's not only unfair, it's wrong to the point of being delusional.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Includes purchasing links for Only Superhuman, on sale now! Updated 12/30/12 with annotations for the novel. Written Worlds -- My blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#1518 |
|
Commander
Location: Burton, UK
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#1519 |
|
Commodore
Location: Germany
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
Dollhouse was so bad it simply didn't deserve that second season and in all honesty it would've been better off without it (like that continuation of the 1st season finale that pretty much ruined the best episode that show had). Wasting resources on a show that doesn't deserve it, simply as an attempt to make up for canceling a good show is not a valid reason. Fringe is an overall great show, but it had a scarily long stretch where it was so bad it was impossible to ignore its begging for a bullet in the head (similar to when nuBSG was turned into a third-rate soap opera with the occasional space scene, just to keep up appearances). It was only during the most recent episodes that Fringe improved enough again to justify the financing to bring it to a satisfying finale. Sarah Connor Chronicles, Alcatraz? I'm not sure you want to use shows as an example when they're merely an example for how a great premise alone is still useless when their scripts need to be screened over and over again before an episode is even greenlit, because some writers are so bad they shouldn't be allowed to write for more than soap operas and reality shows. They only got somewhere decent when it was already way too late for it to matter anyway. Then again, there's Touch, which at least makes me believe that by now they were looking to greenlight some undeserving piece of crap to justify getting out if the science fiction business altogether if they want to. A long history of canceling good shows isn't simply made up for by keeping undeserving ones on life support.
__________________
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. |
|
|
|
|
#1520 | ||||
|
Writer
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
As for Alcatraz, I can't imagine why you'd make the mistake of thinking I would've cited that show in support of my argument, because that show didn't last very long at all, and didn't deserve to. The bottom line is, no matter how supportive the network is, a lot of shows just won't work well enough to make it. Television is always a gamble. We've all seen so many shows in so many genres on so many networks get cancelled after half a season or less that it's bizarre for so many people to react as though it's somehow unique to genre shows or unique to one network.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Includes purchasing links for Only Superhuman, on sale now! Updated 12/30/12 with annotations for the novel. Written Worlds -- My blog |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#1521 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: I'm at WKRP
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while... |
|
|
|
|
#1522 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
There's no reason to mistrust FOX any more than any other network when it comes to sf/f genre shows. All the networks churn through a lot of shows each year, genre or otherwise, and most fail. It'll happen again this year. That doesn't mean anyone is picking on sf/f shows. And they'll keep churning through shows indefinitely because sf/f is a staple genre that among the networks, only CBS can afford to ignore. It's good for attracting that younger demo that advertisers want to reach. NBC, ABC and the CW all have new sf/f shows in the mix. FOX has no new sf/f shows this fall, which surprised me. I'd expect them to add at least one for 2013-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1523 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#1524 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: I'm at WKRP
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while... |
|
|
|
|
#1525 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1526 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#1527 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1528 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#1529 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1530 |
|
Admiral
Location: Arizona, USA
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
Over the course of many encounters and many years, I have successfully developed a standard operating procedure for dealing with big, nasty monsters. Run away. Me and Monty Python. Harry Dresden - Blood Rites (The Dresden Files #6) |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















