Star Trek 2 Has A New Title?

TrekToday · September 8 2012, 05:50 AM

TrekMovie is reporting that the second Star Trek J.J. Abrams movie has finally been named. Paramount is not confirming the title yet, but “this is the title they are going with as of now,” sources told TrekMovie. The title is* “Star Trek Into Darkness.” According to sources, two domains containing those words have been purchased [...]

More...

Mr_Homn · September 8 2012, 05:54 AM

Very unimaginative.

Borgminister · September 8 2012, 06:00 AM

"as of now"

Spock/Uhura Fan · September 8 2012, 06:01 AM

LOL.

This, after Chris Pine meticulously pointed and said that they weren't trying to make a Nolan-style batman movie. They may as well call it "ST: Into The Dark Knight." Then the one after this could be called "ST: Rising Out of the Darkness."

Let's just hope that the movie is good.

22 Stars · September 8 2012, 06:02 AM

Looks confirmed now. Don't love it but a good movie could make it a classic?

Spock/Uhura Fan · September 8 2012, 06:04 AM

Borgminister wrote:

"as of now"

Good point. I do hope it changes. As a side note, I think I'm beginning to understand comments Zachary recently made about the film. He basically said if there are issues with it, don't look at the actors. At least that's what I took from it. I'll still see it if S/U stay together, though, even if it's bad. I do hope it will be good.

C.E. Evans · September 8 2012, 06:07 AM

If it's part of an actual sentence, "Star Trek Into Darkness," rather than "Star Trek: Into Darkness," I'm cool with it. Star Trek XIII could continue that naming theme with "Star Trek Towards the Future" or something like that.

22 Stars · September 8 2012, 06:17 AM

CE i agree, and it seems confirmed that there is no colon. So yes, the third chapter should be something positive and uplifting for sure.

CorporalClegg · September 8 2012, 06:50 AM

After reading this, I looked at the calender. It didn't say 04.01. I cried.

Oso Blanco · September 8 2012, 07:07 AM

Worst title of a Star Trek movie ever!

Overbound · September 8 2012, 07:14 AM

I don't care for it. It sounds very generic. If it is only temporary it could be that the villain's name is in the title and they need something to call it until the secrete is out.

Mr Silver · September 8 2012, 07:20 AM

It could be much worse, after all, Christopher Nolan simply added "Rises" onto the previous title for the third entry in the Batman series.

EyalM · September 8 2012, 07:24 AM

Sounds like some one wanted "Trek Into Darkness" (which sounds better) while someone else wanted to keep "Star Trek" in the title, so we got this hybrid. Which is too bad since TID would have fit nicely with the 3 letter abbreviation tradition

.

Spock/Uhura Fan · September 8 2012, 07:48 AM

^ They might be going with 4 now since that last movie's abbreviation is ST09. This next one is going to be STID, I guess?

CaptainDonovin · September 8 2012, 08:06 AM

I joked on TrekMovie that maybe the title might mean that the danger of suffering from lense flare blindness might be lessened, but I like the title. Its different & space is dark so there you have it.

September 8 2012, 05:50 AM	#1
TrekToday Rear Admiral	Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? TrekMovie is reporting that the second Star Trek J.J. Abrams movie has finally been named. Paramount is not confirming the title yet, but “this is the title they are going with as of now,” sources told TrekMovie. The title is* “Star Trek Into Darkness.” According to sources, two domains containing those words have been purchased [...] More...

September 8 2012, 05:54 AM	#2
Mr_Homn Captain	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Very unimaginative. __________________ "Thank you.. for the drinks."

September 8 2012, 06:00 AM	#3
Borgminister Moderator Location: California	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? "as of now"

September 8 2012, 06:01 AM	#4
Spock/Uhura Fan Captain Location: Where It's At.	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? LOL. This, after Chris Pine meticulously pointed and said that they weren't trying to make a Nolan-style batman movie. They may as well call it "ST: Into The Dark Knight." Then the one after this could be called "ST: Rising Out of the Darkness." Let's just hope that the movie is good. __________________ "I recognize the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid ass decision, I've elected to ignore it." - Nick Fury on The Power of Choice Last edited by Spock/Uhura Fan; September 8 2012 at 07:46 AM.

September 8 2012, 06:02 AM	#5
22 Stars Commodore	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Looks confirmed now. Don't love it but a good movie could make it a classic?

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US

September 8 2012, 06:07 AM	#7
C.E. Evans Vice Admiral Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? If it's part of an actual sentence, "Star Trek Into Darkness," rather than "Star Trek: Into Darkness," I'm cool with it. Star Trek XIII could continue that naming theme with "Star Trek Towards the Future" or something like that. __________________ "Shout, shout, let it all out..."

September 8 2012, 06:17 AM	#8
22 Stars Commodore	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? CE i agree, and it seems confirmed that there is no colon. So yes, the third chapter should be something positive and uplifting for sure.

September 8 2012, 06:50 AM	#9
CorporalClegg Vice Admiral Location: Nuevo México	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? After reading this, I looked at the calender. It didn't say 04.01. I cried. __________________ Hola!

September 8 2012, 07:07 AM	#10
Oso Blanco Fleet Captain Location: Berlin, Germany	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Worst title of a Star Trek movie ever! __________________ Time is the fire in which we burn

September 8 2012, 07:14 AM	#11
Overbound Ensign	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? I don't care for it. It sounds very generic. If it is only temporary it could be that the villain's name is in the title and they need something to call it until the secrete is out.

September 8 2012, 07:20 AM	#12
Mr Silver Rear Admiral Location: UK	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? It could be much worse, after all, Christopher Nolan simply added "Rises" onto the previous title for the third entry in the Batman series.

September 8 2012, 07:24 AM	#13
EyalM Captain Location: Haifa	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? Sounds like some one wanted "Trek Into Darkness" (which sounds better) while someone else wanted to keep "Star Trek" in the title, so we got this hybrid. Which is too bad since TID would have fit nicely with the 3 letter abbreviation tradition . __________________ Well, he’s kind of had it in for me ever since I accidentally ran over his dog. Actually, replace ’accidentally’ with ’repeatedly’ and replace ’dog’ with ’son.’

September 8 2012, 07:48 AM	#14
Spock/Uhura Fan Captain Location: Where It's At.	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? ^ They might be going with 4 now since that last movie's abbreviation is ST09. This next one is going to be STID, I guess? __________________ "I recognize the council has made a decision, but given that it's a stupid ass decision, I've elected to ignore it." - Nick Fury on The Power of Choice

September 8 2012, 08:06 AM	#15
CaptainDonovin Fleet Captain Location: Minnesota	Re: Star Trek 2 Has A New Title? I joked on TrekMovie that maybe the title might mean that the danger of suffering from lense flare blindness might be lessened, but I like the title. Its different & space is dark so there you have it. __________________ Long live DS9!