|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Sports and Fitness It's football, not soccer. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#646 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
![]() I'm so happy about the Nats. I may be a Mets fan first, but damn it's nice to have a local team on top.
__________________
"I cannot believe I just took a picture of an action figure's ass." OdoWanKenobi http://adventuresof-clintasha.tumblr.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#647 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
|
|
|
|
|
#648 | |
|
YEAH I LOVE THAT
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
![]() I mean, you'd have to take some bad apples in order to get your hands on A-Gon, but ... what. I can't imagine any trade for that package that isn't hilariously bad for at least one team, so I am all for this. I'd also like to imagine Cherington said, "We will give you Gonzalez, Crawford, and Beckett in exchange for (whatever)" but the Dodgers refused to consider it unless Nick Punto was added. Or that the Red Sox are insisting on getting Mattingly in return, since they appear to have begun their traditional institutional hatchet job on Bobby V. Edit: Punto and Gonzalez have been scratched from the lineup. James Loney on the Dodgers, too. Holy hell, this is actually going to happen.
__________________
I didn't do it. I wasn't even here that day! Last edited by Timby; August 25 2012 at 12:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#649 | ||
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Va. Beach, VA
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
Searching for something, a million miles and a ways to go. |
||
|
|
|
|
#650 | |
|
YEAH I LOVE THAT
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
They are and have been a very, very fucked-up organization for quite some time, as evidenced by how no one leaves without having a massive hatchet job done on them. Bobby V's is already in progress, and Lucchino's going to plant a story in the papers that Adrian Gonzalez was molesting puppies in the clubhouse or something similarly absurd within a few weeks of this trade going through.
__________________
I didn't do it. I wasn't even here that day! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#651 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Va. Beach, VA
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
Searching for something, a million miles and a ways to go. |
|
|
|
|
#652 |
|
Admiral
Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
On one hand, plenty of room to do whatever now, and a ton more prospects to play with in trades over the winter, or incorporate some and trade some of ours, whatever. It's definitely a blow it up and rebuild moment, though. This one just wasn't getting it done, but still drastic. Bobby V had better go, as well as clearing out most of the staff in the offseason. This should also be the way that Ellsbury gets his money to stay with the Sox. He gets Crawford's deal, give or take...
__________________
Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey STO: @JScout33 |
|
|
|
|
#653 |
|
Muad'Dib
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
I believe in the teachings of the middle ground. I maybe blind but my heart can see. Of course I'm a creationist. I believe man created god. |
|
|
|
|
#654 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
Damn. Once this goes through, the Red Sox payroll will drop to like $45 million, I think. Or that might be next year's payroll (not including any deals between now and then). I just hope they don't immediately blow all that extra space on bad contracts again. They need to go back to building up their farm system and developing talent from the ground up. As for Valentine, he won't be here in three years. He might stick around next year if the Sox think they have a shot at getting John Farrell after his deal ends with the Blue Jays, but otherwise all bets are off. And I'm not sure that the Red Sox will want to give Ellsbury a Craword-type deal even with their new flexibility. They've got Jackie Bradley, Jr. waiting in the wings, and all indications are that he's going to be excellent. |
|
|
|
|
#655 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Va. Beach, VA
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
Also, man how do the Dodgers afford all of this. They went nuts during the trade deadline and now they bring in all of this. They upgrade everywhere. Gonzo > Loney Punto > Ellis Beckett might be rejuvenated to be on a contender. Look what it did for Hanley Ramirez Crawford is an upgrade in left. The Dodgers are ready to go all in this year.
__________________
Searching for something, a million miles and a ways to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#656 | ||
|
YEAH I LOVE THAT
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
I didn't do it. I wasn't even here that day! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#657 | |
|
YEAH I LOVE THAT
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
I can't wait to see the shit-talking they plant about Punto.
__________________
I didn't do it. I wasn't even here that day! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#658 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
|
|
|
|
|
#659 |
|
YEAH I LOVE THAT
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
I didn't do it. I wasn't even here that day! |
|
|
|
|
|
#660 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Va. Beach, VA
|
Re: MLB Discussion - 2012 Season
__________________
Searching for something, a million miles and a ways to go. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.




















