RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,121
Posts: 5,401,001
Members: 24,743
Currently online: 521
Newest member: jessydhillon

TrekToday headlines

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Retro Watches
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

New DS9 eBook To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Trek Ice Cube Maker and Shot Glasses
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Deep Space Nine

Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 4 2012, 06:31 AM   #1
los2188
Commander
 
los2188's Avatar
 
Location: North Carolina
The Maquis or the Federation?

I'm curious about the Maquis. Even after all these many years of the TNG era Trek, I still don't have a yay or nay opinion on whether I would side with the Maquis or Federation. I still don't have a crystal clear understanding along with the whys and why nots of the Maquis. Whom would you side with? The Maquis, or the Federation?? Or maybe even Cadassians? When I ask this question, please assume that you're human and not Bjorn or Cardassian or some other such humanoid species.
__________________
Darling, you remain as aesthetically pleasing as the first day we met. I believe I am the most fortunate sentient in this sector of the galaxy.
los2188 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 08:06 AM   #2
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

You could make a moral arguement about the merits of both sides, which is what made it such a compelling story arc. These weren't your generic bad guys of the week. Sure they were the antagonists, but you can't help but sympathize with them and the poor situation they were dealt.

As for your question, me personally? If I lived in those colonies, I probably would join up. Otherwise if I lived elsewhere in the Federation, I'd probably speak up for them sympatheticly, but draw the line there. Definitely wouldn't pull an Eddington.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 08:21 AM   #3
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

Ditto, except that if I'd lived in those colonies I would have relocated deeper into Federation space.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 02:09 PM   #4
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

the Federation.


Peace trumps some random pieces of land.


And in the 24th century, where your "home" is just doesn't really matter. The UFP is a utopia where all your basic needs are provided for and you can work as whatever you want.

It's not like now where relocation might mean having to find a new job, a new house, etc.



The Maquis "cause" was just silly.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 02:52 PM   #5
Mage
Commodore
 
Mage's Avatar
 
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

sonak wrote: View Post
the Federation.


Peace trumps some random pieces of land.


And in the 24th century, where your "home" is just doesn't really matter. The UFP is a utopia where all your basic needs are provided for and you can work as whatever you want.

It's not like now where relocation might mean having to find a new job, a new house, etc.



The Maquis "cause" was just silly.

Silly? These people had made lives for themselves there. If you were suddenly told that the home you lived in was going to be taken from you, the home where you are happy and want to spend your life, you don't just say 'well that's just super, where do I sign up?'. Even if your government was going to pay for a new house, give you a job and feed you. You are happy where you are.

The Maquis were right in there cause. The Federation had no right to just give away those colonies without atleast asking what the people who life there think about it. You talk about Utopia (and as Sisko said, only the coreworlds have real Utopia, the colonies still have to struggle to maintain themselves). In a Utopian society, everybody matters. No one is forced into doing anything they don't want. So by forcing to settlers into abandoning their homes, the Federation is basicly showing their true colors.

Perhaps the attitude of doing what you are told works for Starfleet officers, but a civilian will struggle with that sort of forced relocation. Hell, even Starfleet officers saw how wrong it was and decided to join up.
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat.
Mage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 02:56 PM   #6
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

sonak wrote: View Post
the Federation.


Peace trumps some random pieces of land.


And in the 24th century, where your "home" is just doesn't really matter. The UFP is a utopia where all your basic needs are provided for and you can work as whatever you want.

It's not like now where relocation might mean having to find a new job, a new house, etc.



The Maquis "cause" was just silly.
Wasn't the whole Marquis/Cardassian conflict none of the Federation's business though. I mean last I hear on the subject they weren't federation citizens any more.

Plus it was a crappy treaty anyway.
Hartzilla2007 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 02:56 PM   #7
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

You are happy where you are.
And that's what you go to a war over, and get thousands killed? Shame on you!

The proper response is to write a scathing letter in the local newspaper, or go to the pub, get drunk and complain to your pint until it appears to start listening. Not to start shooting at people.

I mean last I hear on the subject they weren't federation citizens any more.
That never happened. In "Journey's End", a bunch of colonists who definitely weren't Maquis abandoned their UFP citizenship and were never heard of again. In the remaining episodes describing the colonists at the Cardassian border, a bunch of colonists started shooting at stuff but never had the guts to stop being UFP citizens and reaping the benefits; when this murderous scum was finally wiped out in "Blaze of Glory", Eddington expressed anguish that they had been on the verge of declaring independence from the UFP, but never got around to it.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 04:29 PM   #8
Use of Time
Commodore
 
Use of Time's Avatar
 
Location: Va. Beach, VA
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

I'll agree that the treaty itself was incredibly inconsiderate of the border worlds.

That being said The Maquis seemed to want their cake and eat it too. They weren't really good about meeting the Federation halfway. Like Timo said they never declared independence and began slipping further into the category of terrorists. This forced the Federation's hand in siding against them. They did themselves no favors there.

Also, if I were a parent and had kids on those colonies, I would have relocated without question. If we started getting harassed by Cardassians then I would have definitely drawn the line there. It just wouldn't have been worth it to me.
__________________
Searching for something, a million miles and a ways to go.
Use of Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 04:55 PM   #9
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

This isnt the same thing (well you would hope not) but what would you do if you lived near the border with another country, lets say for example Mexico or Canada for some of you guys who live in the States, and for whatever reason your Government made some deal which now mean your home was part of the other countries territory...

Would you be happy about that in the slightest?
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 05:03 PM   #10
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

How did that peace treaty turn out again? Let's see during the armistice of it the Cardassians destroyed a Federation colony and tried blaming it on Bajor, during the negotitations of said peace treaty they tried siezing Minos Korva, after it was signed they repeatedly attacked Federation targets when expedient, and eventually joined the Dominion and instigated the largest war in Federation history.

Yup, that peace treaty with Cardassia sure worked out good.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 05:12 PM   #11
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

Mage wrote: View Post
The Maquis were right in there cause. The Federation had no right to just give away those colonies without atleast asking what the people who life there think about it.
Actually, the Federation had every right.

And if you recall from the TNG episode which established the Maquis as a concept, the colonists WERE asked about it - and it was their bloody idea to stay in the DMZ in the first place! They knew full well that they would be living under Cardassian rule. They insisted on it!
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 06:24 PM   #12
starburst
Fleet Captain
 
starburst's Avatar
 
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

But would you want to give up your home, I mean some of us might be willing to even if begrudgingly, but some who have spent years building a life on those colonies would be far less likely to want to up sticks and move (and going back to my analogy they had every reason to, the Cardassians are hardly Canadian or Mexican!)
starburst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 06:28 PM   #13
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

When you call them colonies, I get the impression most people think they just landed down there yesterday. That's not really the case. They had been there for at least one generation as Voyager mentions some of their Maquis having been born in what is the DMZ.

Anyone there would have every right to be angry to have their home ceded to an aggressive expansionalist empire in the attempt of appeasement when their behavior had already showed they were not at all interested in peace.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 06:49 PM   #14
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

The colonists are quite free to feel "angry" or "not happy" or whatever about the situation. If they decide to start an armed rebellion over it, their homes deserve to burn brightly.

What happened to sense of proportion? In the Trek universe, these people belong to a mental hospital. In our universe, they would be jailed for years, and even if their territories were later reacquired by their native country, the lunatics who had served their sentences would hopefully be prevented from trying to benefit from their crimes by banning them from ever getting that land back.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 4 2012, 06:53 PM   #15
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: The Maquis or the Federation?

Timo wrote: View Post
The colonists are quite free to feel "angry" or "not happy" or whatever about the situation. If they decide to start an armed rebellion over it, their homes deserve to burn brightly.

What happened to sense of proportion? In the Trek universe, these people belong to a mental hospital. In our universe, they would be jailed for years, and even if their territories were later reacquired by their native country, the lunatics who had served their sentences would hopefully be prevented from trying to benefit from their crimes by banning them from ever getting that land back.

Timo Saloniemi
Yeah you're right. They should just politely ask the Cardassians not to rape their women, poison their replicators, beat and shoot them for fun.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cardassian, eddington, federation, maquis, starfleet

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.