RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,721
Posts: 5,214,814
Members: 24,211
Currently online: 693
Newest member: dmhp32


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 16 2012, 02:20 AM   #4726
Saga
Rear Admiral
 
Saga's Avatar
 
Location: VA
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Saga Send a message via Yahoo to Saga
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

i for one will continue to make childish complaints about the reboot...
__________________
formerly known as Praetor_Shinzon.
Saga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 02:34 AM   #4727
Allyn Gibson
Vice Admiral
 
Allyn Gibson's Avatar
 
Location: South Pennsyltucky
View Allyn Gibson's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to Allyn Gibson Send a message via Yahoo to Allyn Gibson
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Praetor_Shinzon wrote: View Post
i for one will continue to make childish complaints about the reboot...
Given the latest news out of San Diego -- Tim Drake was never Robin (despite a year of comics that have stated the opposite) -- childish complaints aren't always so childish.

This news may explain why Jeff Lemire's Robins book is MIA. It doesn't explain why Tim Drake has been referred to as a Robin, especially by Damian in recent issues of Batman and Robin.
__________________
"When David Marcus cited the great thinkers of history -- "Newton, Einstein, Surak" -- Newt Gingrich did not make his list." -- 24 January 2012

allyngibson.net
Allyn Gibson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 02:50 AM   #4728
shivkala
Rear Admiral
 
shivkala's Avatar
 
Location: Patrolling Sector 2814
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

If I may play Devil's Advocate for a moment:



I'm not sure a full-line, hard reset would be a good idea, despite its many good points.

For one, as evidenced by The Legion of Super-Heroes and its many re-boots, it's hard not to revisit some storylines and "update" them. While I thought the post-Zero Hour Legion did a good job of this, others were upset that certain things like the Suneater, the Fatal Five, the team fighting Mordru, the team taking on Darkseid, etc. had all been done before. And when they broke away with that, such as when they killed Leviathan (aka Colossal Boy), they freaked out.

Another thing is that it would have made introducing these 52 titles and characters a nightmare. The Ultimate line is an example of how to do it right, since it started with one title (Ultimate Spider-Man, then introduced Ultimate X-Men, both of which introduced ideas, concepts, and characters that lead to The Ultimates, then they lauched Ultimate Fantastic Four over the course of years). A hard-reboot of the entire line would be a nightmare to avoid 52 concepts all appearing at once.

Finally, there's throwing the baby out with the bathwater. In the case of Batman and Green Lantern, why bother doing a hard reset when you have top selling books and recent, popular storylines? Then there are the other titles, such as Aquaman which benefit from being able to pick and choose what did and did not happen. Now most of the titles don't seem to be taking advantage of that, but some titles are. It's nothing new, as the post-Crisis DCU did the same thing. Grant Morrison has even taken advantage of that by saying that all of Batman's history was in-continuity prior to Flashpoint, it's just that some of the trippier stuff didn't happen as presented in the 50's and 60's, but was rather a hallucination of some kind. So, instead of reinventing the wheel and retelling the same story, the reader is asked to accept that the key parts happened, but happened differently than they remember. Thus, Batgirl can still claim The Killing Joke is in continuity, but it may have happened a little differently than Alan Moore and Brian Bolland presented it. I'm fine with that.

You could argue that the New-52 did not do a good job of this, and I would agree in some cases, but that still does not mean you had to dump everything. The condensed 5 year timeline, being an example of where it goes wrong. However, this is more a problem with execution than the idea itself.
__________________
"When I reach for the edge of the universe, I do it knowing that along some paths of cosmic discovery, there are times when, at least for now, one must be content to love the questions themselves." --Neil deGrasse Tyson
shivkala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 02:50 AM   #4729
Mike Farley
Commodore
 
Mike Farley's Avatar
 
Location: Lost Vegas
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

If they're going to get rid of Tim's time as Robin, they might as well have gotten rid of Tim altogether.

Let him hang with Wally, Donna, and all the other popular characters that DcNu doesn't have room for anymore.
Mike Farley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 03:40 AM   #4730
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Oh dear. This is going to piss off more fans lol if this indeed so. More tinkering and retconning and why a full on reboot was probably the way to go if they were going to just continue making changes anyway.

I've been wondering about Jeff Lemaire's Robins too. I guess editorial changed their minds about since they're continuing to tweak Batman's past.
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 04:32 AM   #4731
Trekker4747
Fleet Admiral
 
Trekker4747's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Well, it seems like most of the titles came out okay with the soft/semi-"reboot." I think "Batman" probably needed a harder one with some origin story/early Batman career like Superman got but -yeah- I get all of the backstory and stuff he has was wanted to keep intact to please many people. But it seems like a lot has now been crammed into a short amount of story time (multiple Robins, the Killing Joke and so much more) I think Batman could have dealt with a tougher reboot or one of his four books could have taken place in an early Batman career or been an origin/beginnings even getting to a point of introducing a Dick Grayson Robin.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
Trekker4747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 04:49 AM   #4732
Professor Zoom
Vice Admiral
 
Professor Zoom's Avatar
 
Location: Idealistic
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Trekker4747 wrote: View Post
Well, it seems like most of the titles came out okay with the soft/semi-"reboot." I think "Batman" probably needed a harder one with some origin story/early Batman career like Superman got but -yeah- I get all of the backstory and stuff he has was wanted to keep intact to please many people. But it seems like a lot has now been crammed into a short amount of story time (multiple Robins, the Killing Joke and so much more) I think Batman could have dealt with a tougher reboot or one of his four books could have taken place in an early Batman career or been an origin/beginnings even getting to a point of introducing a Dick Grayson Robin.
Perhaps from a creative point of view, yeah, but from a business point of view, no. It was far to popular to just wipe the slate clean.

And to be frank, I haven't read Batman in YEARS, and it wasn't hard to pick up these number 1s and understand what was going on. Bruce Wayne dresses up at a Bat and fights crime. There has been nothing particularly confusing. It's like back in the day when you would buy issue 137 of something to try it out....

A clean slate though WOULD make things like was Tim Drake Robin or not more clear, but whatever, in a few years no one will care.
__________________
Batman does not eat nachos.
Professor Zoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 04:56 AM   #4733
shivkala
Rear Admiral
 
shivkala's Avatar
 
Location: Patrolling Sector 2814
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Well, again, if most of the Batman books are good as they are, why bother doing a hard reset, even if it is to fit Tim in, somewhere. The problem is not in needing to do a hard reset, the problem is saying that Bruce got his start as Batman five years ago. Even if they did a hard reset, either they'd have to say he had 4 Robins in 5 years or they'd have to slowly reintroduce each Robin when the time was right, so that by 2031 we'd have all four Robins.

The other problem is, that Batman's origin is a simple one that doesn't necessarily benefit from tweaks. Superman's origin, yes, you have to decide on what Krypton was like, how Ma and Pa Kent came across baby Kal-El, when/how they died, how Clark came to Metropolis and got his job at the Daily Planet, etc.

With Batman, yeah you could tweak his "tour around the world" and there's the question of "does he know who killed his parents," but aside from that, it's only minor things that are changed with each origin.

There's also the fact that in the 25 years between the Man of Steel and Flashpoint Superman's origin had been told 3 times (Mos, Birthright, and Secret Origin) not mention one "fake out" (The "Return to Krytpon" storyline in 2000), minor tweaks between Infinite Crisis and Secret Origin, and the eventual New-52 origin.

Contrast that with Batman, who got what most consider the epitome of a good origin in Batman: Year One that still serves as the origin of choice, again, with minor tweaks which don't change Miller's story (does Bruce know about Joe Chill or not, what did Bruce do in his time away from Gotham, etc.).

I just don't see messing with an established, cherished origin story just to shoehorn Tim Drake into a 5 year timeline.

And again, I agree with you that the 5 year timeline is a problem. I just don't agree the solution would have been to do a hard reboot on the Batman franchise.
__________________
"When I reach for the edge of the universe, I do it knowing that along some paths of cosmic discovery, there are times when, at least for now, one must be content to love the questions themselves." --Neil deGrasse Tyson
shivkala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 05:39 AM   #4734
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Mike Farley wrote: View Post
If they're going to get rid of Tim's time as Robin, they might as well have gotten rid of Tim altogether.

Let him hang with Wally, Donna, and all the other popular characters that DcNu doesn't have room for anymore.
From what I read he takes the name Red Robin from the get go. So he's still a "Robin."
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 06:19 AM   #4735
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Yet not Robin. There is a specific reason why Tim took the name Red Robin...it was because of Damian. Changing the past so that he's Red Robin from the start...what's the point of that?
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 06:22 AM   #4736
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Admiral_Young wrote: View Post
Yet not Robin. There is a specific reason why Tim took the name Red Robin...it was because of Damian. Changing the past so that he's Red Robin from the start...what's the point of that?
We'll find out when the issue comes out.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 06:29 AM   #4737
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

I guess. This will be another contradiction though, as Allyn stated we've already a year of 52'Verse comics that state that Tim was a Robin, so already they're retconning which is why we're making such childish complaints
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 06:31 AM   #4738
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Admiral_Young wrote: View Post
I guess. This will be another contradiction though, as Allyn stated we've already a year of 52'Verse comics that state that Tim was a Robin, so already they're retconning which is why we're making such childish complaints
So they changed their mind. No big deal really. Comics have always been "works in progress". Sort of like Star Trek.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 06:36 AM   #4739
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

It's a big deal for those of us who do care about this kind of thing. I know you personally don't from your posts, and I respect that. It just is an aspect of the relaunch that I've disagreed with. One of the cons if you will.

As I've said in the past in the thread there have been more cons than pros for me personally. I've said a ton of great things about the relaunch books that I'm still reading. Aquaman and Wonder Woman have been one of the great beneficiaries. There have been other books as well.
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 16 2012, 11:47 AM   #4740
Derishton
Vice Admiral
 
Derishton's Avatar
 
Location: Nova Scotia (Derishton)
Re: DC's New 52: Reviews and Discussion (Spoilers welcolme and likely)

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
Admiral_Young wrote: View Post
I guess. This will be another contradiction though, as Allyn stated we've already a year of 52'Verse comics that state that Tim was a Robin, so already they're retconning which is why we're making such childish complaints
So they changed their mind. No big deal really. Comics have always been "works in progress". Sort of like Star Trek.
It's pure semantics - Batman and Robin 10 had all the Robins arguing about who was the best Robin. Nobody took the time to put a note beside Tim's title.
__________________
I want to be sedated.
Derishton is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
batman, comic books, comics, dc comics, dc's new 52, justice league, superman, wonder woman

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.