Urban outs the villain. Maybe. - Page 8

Greg Cox · July 12 2012, 09:02 PM

Temis the Vorta wrote:

Here's a vote for the Horta! Let's see just how good an actor Cumberbund really is.

"No Kill I!"

Mach5 · July 12 2012, 09:06 PM

Temis the Vorta wrote:

Let's see just how good an actor Cumberbund really is.

Some of us already did. He was awesome as Stephen Hawking way back, in 2004.

And then, there's, of course, Sherlock.

Greg Cox · July 12 2012, 09:15 PM

Mach5 wrote:

Temis the Vorta wrote:

Let's see just how good an actor Cumberbund really is.

Some of us already did. He was awesome as Stephen Hawking way back, in 2004.

And then, there's, of course, Sherlock.

And Dr. Frankenstein AND his Creature.

Jackson_Roykirk · July 12 2012, 09:26 PM

Greg Cox wrote:

Mach5 wrote:

Temis the Vorta wrote:

Let's see just how good an actor Cumberbund really is.

Some of us already did. He was awesome as Stephen Hawking way back, in 2004.

And then, there's, of course, Sherlock.

And Dr. Frankenstein AND his Creature.

And Peter Guillam in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. He'll probably return in the sequel, Smiley's People, considering the character returns as well in John le Carre's novels.

iguana_tonante · July 12 2012, 10:47 PM

M'Sharak wrote:

"Saucy Orci".

Saul · July 13 2012, 12:50 PM

This interview may confirm what he said http://www.aintitcool.com/node/56985

Still not convinced though... Good show, JJ. I have absolutely no idea now who is the villain.

JarodRussell · July 13 2012, 07:04 PM

Saul wrote:

This interview may confirm what he said http://www.aintitcool.com/node/56985

Still not convinced though... Good show, JJ. I have absolutely no idea now who is the villain.

Maybe you won't even know who the villain is after you've seen the whole film.

Greg Cox · July 13 2012, 08:02 PM

It's Rambaldi!

Set Harth · July 13 2012, 11:44 PM

ssosmcin wrote:

It's all a big Khan.

( To the tune of "Jammin' Me" by Tom Petty )

You're Khannin' me...

You're Khannin' me...

Quit Khaaaaaaannin' me!

Mach5 · July 14 2012, 09:17 AM

Greg Cox wrote:

It's Rambaldi!

What, did Rambaldi achieve immortality or something?

I gave up on that retarded show early in.

Saul · July 14 2012, 04:37 PM

JarodRussell wrote:

Saul wrote:

This interview may confirm what he said http://www.aintitcool.com/node/56985

Still not convinced though... Good show, JJ. I have absolutely no idea now who is the villain.

Maybe you won't even know who the villain is after you've seen the whole film.

Quite possible. But i'll still be thinking that Khan was involved somehow....

BillJ · July 14 2012, 04:43 PM

I'm still thinking Cumberbatch is playing Khan and Peter Weller is playing an advanced age Gary Seven who seeks out Kirk to capture Khan.

Procutus · July 14 2012, 05:25 PM

BillJ wrote:

I'm still thinking Cumberbatch is playing Khan and Peter Weller is playing an advanced age Gary Seven who seeks out Kirk to capture Khan.

I can definitely see Weller portraying Gary Seven, but I really, really hope that Cumberbund isn't playing Khan. Personally, I think Urban really did let the cat out of the bag by accident, hence his back-peddling now. Based on what I've seen of BC's acting thus far, I think Mitchell would be a good match for him, especially a Mitchell who's ESP has turned him into a super-human of some sort. Plus, I think Mitchell as the 'bad guy' is more interesting than doing Khan again, simply because of his friendship and history with Kirk.

My guess as to what role Weller is really playing would be an operative of Section 31. I could be wrong, but I think it would fit with the potential Mitchell storyline.

BillJ · July 14 2012, 05:32 PM

Procutus wrote:

Plus, I think Mitchell as the 'bad guy' is more interesting than doing Khan again, simply because of his friendship and history with Kirk.

But does he still have that same history with Kirk due to the differences in the timeline?

Plus, I think it would be weird for them to try and remake Where No Man... yet again after already doing it in the comic. I'm not sure there are too many different ways to tell that particular story.

BillJ · July 14 2012, 05:44 PM

I guess that you could always go down the road of Gary Mitchell being a genetically engineered agent of Section 31 who went rogue?

But you'd lose much of the back story with Kirk and it really wouldn't resemble any of the events of Where No Man.... In a case like that, you're simply recycling the name as nothing there really resembles the character that came before.

July 13 2012, 12:50 PM	#111
Saul Rear Admiral Location: 東京	Re: Urban outs the villain. Maybe. This interview may confirm what he said http://www.aintitcool.com/node/56985 Still not convinced though... Good show, JJ. I have absolutely no idea now who is the villain. __________________ "It's not that you can see the strings, it's that 40 years later you're still looking at them." - Steven Moffat "This movie was big. Imagine how big it could have been with me in it?" William Shatner

July 13 2012, 08:02 PM	#113
Greg Cox Vice Admiral Location: Oxford, PA	Re: Urban outs the villain. Maybe. It's Rambaldi! __________________ www.gregcox-author.com

July 14 2012, 04:43 PM	#117
BillJ Vice Admiral Location: Greater Cincinnati	Re: Urban outs the villain. Maybe. I'm still thinking Cumberbatch is playing Khan and Peter Weller is playing an advanced age Gary Seven who seeks out Kirk to capture Khan. __________________ J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did.

July 14 2012, 05:44 PM	#120
BillJ Vice Admiral Location: Greater Cincinnati	Re: Urban outs the villain. Maybe. I guess that you could always go down the road of Gary Mitchell being a genetically engineered agent of Section 31 who went rogue? But you'd lose much of the back story with Kirk and it really wouldn't resemble any of the events of Where No Man.... In a case like that, you're simply recycling the name as nothing there really resembles the character that came before. __________________ J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did.

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US