RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,744
Posts: 5,215,816
Members: 24,215
Currently online: 751
Newest member: rpoe0728

TrekToday headlines

Q Meets NuTrek Crew
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

Pine In Talks For Drama
By: T'Bonz on Apr 18

New X-Men: Days of Future Past Trailer
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Nimoy to Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Apr 17

Star Trek Special: Flesh and Stone Comic
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

These Are The Voyages TOS Season Two Book Review
By: T'Bonz on Apr 16

Kirk’s Well Wishes To Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Quinto In New Starz Series
By: T'Bonz on Apr 15

Star Trek: Horizon Film
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14

Star Trek: Fleet Captains Game Expansion
By: T'Bonz on Apr 14


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How do you rate The Amazing Spider-Man?
Excellent 23 33.82%
Good 29 42.65%
Fair 10 14.71%
Poor 4 5.88%
Terrible 2 2.94%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 9 2012, 04:43 PM   #226
Samurai8472
Vice Admiral
 
Samurai8472's Avatar
 
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

It's funny how this movie was supposedly going cheap with all the practical effects like swinging and giving garfield way less money than tobey during the first movie.

And yet it's 230-250 million dollar budget


Captain Craig wrote: View Post
Guy he was forced to use Venom when his prior script had already been approved.

Saying a non human face as a baddie wouldn't be accepted is a bit WTF excuse that does not jive imo.
Maybe that's why lizard never had a snout in the movie

It's alway interesting to read how avi arad act like the devil on raimis shoulder

"It was really about Peter, Mary Jane, Harry and that new character...
...Avi Arad, my partner and the former president of Marvel at the time, said to me, 'Sam, ... you're not paying attention to the fans enough,'" Raimi said. "'You need to think about them. You've made two movies now with your favorite villains, and now you're about to make another one with your favorite villains. The fans love Venom. He is the fan favorite. All Spider-Man readers love Venom, and even though you came from '70s Spider-Man, this is what the kids are thinking about. Please incorporate Venom. Listen to the fans now.' And so that's really where I realized, 'OK, maybe I don't have the whole Spider-Man universe in my head. I need to learn a little bit more about Spider-Man and maybe incorporate this villain to make some of the real die-hard fans of Spider-Man finally happy.'""
__________________
"Inception" is a layer cake.
Samurai8472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 04:49 PM   #227
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Gotta love that "playing it nice for PR purposes" spin that Sam gave it in those interviews. As each interview went on it got easier to read between the lines.

Avi: Sam I have convinced the Sony exces we need Venom, fans love him, put him in the movie.
Sam: But the shooting script we approved doesn't have Venom. We start shooting in 3months.
Avi: Put him in the movie
Sam: Are we pushing shooting back to allow me time to...
Avi: -Sam, just get it done.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 04:49 PM   #228
TremblingBluStar
Vice Admiral
 
TremblingBluStar's Avatar
 
Location: Fort Dodge, IA
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Saul wrote: View Post
Seems like quite a few don't like Raimi's Spider-Man. I thought Raimi's first Spider-Man was done quite well. 2 was brilliant. 3 was meh but I still enjoyed it more than ASM. Spider-Man released in 2002 was a game changer for comic book movies, it was a step up to something else moving away from what was done in Batman and Superman films. ASM is just another comic book movie.
I believe exactly what you believe, only the opposite.

The first Raimi film was incredibly cheesy, with a villain who resembled a Power Ranger more than the Green Goblin. However, it showed promise. Two was much better. Three was easily the dullest and most convoluted of the three. ASM was consistently entertaining, in my opinion, and had much more heart than the tired display Spider-Man 3 ended up being.
TremblingBluStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 04:51 PM   #229
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Captain Craig wrote: View Post
My only real gripe with the 2002 film was Gwen should've been the first girlfriend and organic web shooters. Those are more "how is it as an adaptation" than "does the story work" type complaint.
The Raimi film has tons more heart and believability in the first hour than TASM does.
You buy into the Uncle Ben/Peter aspect way, way more than what Webb did for starters.
I didn't't mind the organic web shooters. But I agree that it should have been Gwen first rather than MJ. I recall a comment that they went with MJ because supposedly more people were familiar with her. Still it worked well enough for what it was.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991

Last edited by Warped9; July 10 2012 at 03:24 AM.
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 04:54 PM   #230
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Captain Craig wrote: View Post
My only real gripe with the 2002 film was Gwen should've been the first girlfriend and organic web shooters. Those are more "how is it as an adaptation" than "does the story work" type complaint.
The Raimi film has tons more heart and believability in the first hour than TASM does.
You buy into the Uncle Ben/Peter aspect way, way more than what Webb did for starters.
I didn't"t mind the organic web shooters. But I agree that it should have been Gwen first rather than MJ. I recall a comment that they went with MJ because supposedly more people were familiar with her. Still it worked well enough for what it was.
I should've also said I missed not having any purple on Green Goblin but DaFoe brought the maniacal side out so well I accepted it. I had hoped that for Spidey 3 Harry would add the purple to it and they would move it more towards "right", instead we got the flying snowboard X Games attired look.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 05:01 PM   #231
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Yeah the Goblin costume didn't really work. But to be fair it's hard to think of one that WOULD.

He's just a very silly looking character.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 05:24 PM   #232
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

davejames wrote: View Post
Yeah the Goblin costume didn't really work. But to be fair it's hard to think of one that WOULD.

He's just a very silly looking character.
I can't argue that.

For me SM3 stumbled because of trying to cram too much into it. I thought the Sandman was a poor villain---he's just a petty street crook with no grand agenda. He certainly had no idea of offing Spidey until Venom came along and then in the end he was prepared to just walk away rather than try finishing Spidey off. Sandman's heart just wasn't in it.

Osborn's performance enhancing stuff did pretty much the same thing as the black goo: exacerbate one's darker tendencies and inhibit normal inhibitions in addition to enhancing physical ability. The question remains: what would Harry have gone on to do beyond just trying to revenge his father's death? Could he have been a complete villain or was he really just obsessed with killing Peter? This should have been the main story IMO and Harry could have been the one to try to corrupt Sandman if needed.

To me Venom was extraneous, and apparently Raimi thought so too. Including him (at the suits' insistence) fucked everything up. Venom could easily have been done later. At best we could have had a foreshadowing by having the goo merge with Eddie Brock at the end of the film.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 05:45 PM   #233
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Warped9 wrote: View Post
For me SM3 stumbled because of trying to cram too much into it.
And yet - as you point out - Sandman was a lame-ass villain, and Harry had become a one-note revenge machine. Who then gets partial amnesia to make him a good guy again - how contrived is that? I never much liked the Harry character, but by resetting him, they made him even more annoying.

Makes me wonder if maybe the studio saw that Raimi was cooking up a big fat nothing, and desperately demanded Venom's inclusion in order to give the movie some kind of menace?


Regardless, ASM scores major points by me for not having Harry around. His and Peter's friendship always felt forced and unconvincing, written to justify Peter's connection to Norman more than anything else.
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 05:52 PM   #234
Saul
Rear Admiral
 
Saul's Avatar
 
Location: 東京
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

davejames wrote: View Post
Yeah the Goblin costume didn't really work. But to be fair it's hard to think of one that WOULD.

He's just a very silly looking character.
To be fair the Goblin costume for the first film had problems and what they ended up with wasn't what they had planned. With that said Willem Dafoe could have worn a giant cheese costume and still make it work.

I found ASM lacking heart. I don't mind the dark tone but Parker's character goes from awesome guy to awesome guy with powers.
__________________
"It's not that you can see the strings, it's that 40 years later you're still looking at them." - Steven Moffat
"This movie was big. Imagine how big it could have been with me in it?" William Shatner
Saul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 05:54 PM   #235
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

I thought the Sandman was the best part of that movie myself. Thomas Haden Church made him feel incredibly human and sympathetic, and his powers and look were different from any supervillain we've seen on screen before.

It's a shame Raimi wasn't able to just tell that story, because I think the movie could have actually been as strong as the previous one.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 07:08 PM   #236
Pauln6
Commodore
 
Pauln6's Avatar
 
Location: Bristol, United Kingdom
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Samurai8472 wrote: View Post
Captain Craig wrote: View Post
Guy he was forced to use Venom when his prior script had already been approved.

Saying a non human face as a baddie wouldn't be accepted is a bit WTF excuse that does not jive imo.
Maybe that's why lizard never had a snout in the movie

It's alway interesting to read how avi arad act like the devil on raimis shoulder

"It was really about Peter, Mary Jane, Harry and that new character...
...Avi Arad, my partner and the former president of Marvel at the time, said to me, 'Sam, ... you're not paying attention to the fans enough,'" Raimi said. "'You need to think about them. You've made two movies now with your favorite villains, and now you're about to make another one with your favorite villains. The fans love Venom. He is the fan favorite. All Spider-Man readers love Venom, and even though you came from '70s Spider-Man, this is what the kids are thinking about. Please incorporate Venom. Listen to the fans now.' And so that's really where I realized, 'OK, maybe I don't have the whole Spider-Man universe in my head. I need to learn a little bit more about Spider-Man and maybe incorporate this villain to make some of the real die-hard fans of Spider-Man finally happy.'""
It doesn't surprise that Raimi was aming for Spidey from the 70s, I think this is why I felt he hit the mark. No doubt modern readers and non-readers thought it was cheesy but that is exactly what Spidey was back then.

The black suit was a good opportunity to break up PP & MJ like they did, and it set us up for Venom but tagging him on the end was stupid. I feel the same way about Two-Face in Dark Knight though so clearly my view isn't shared by producers.

Back-to-back 4 & 5 giving Venom & Carnage a decent span would have been really cool actually.

I think the 3 movie deals they use habitually work against these comic franchises. The directors and producers rush to squeeze in as much as they can and then reboot. It's getting annoying.

Changing the cast can work but chainging the tone too much can be a disaster - see Batman & Robin. A darker S3 could have led nicely to ASM without the need to waste 45 minutes on retelling the origin story. Oh well, what's done is done.

I'm still keeping everything crossed that Singer isn't done with the original X-men movie timeline...
__________________
Star Trek/Babylon 5/Alien crossover www.youtube.com/user/pauln6

Other Worlds Role Playing Game
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/produc...ducts_id=97631
Pauln6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 07:19 PM   #237
Allyn Gibson
Vice Admiral
 
Allyn Gibson's Avatar
 
Location: South Pennsyltucky
View Allyn Gibson's Twitter Profile Send a message via AIM to Allyn Gibson Send a message via Yahoo to Allyn Gibson
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Dream wrote: View Post
Still doesn't explain how the budget for ASM ended up massive at 230 million even with an entirely new cast for the reboot. ASM cost more to make than The Avengers!
For one thing, it has to absord any of the pre-production costs that the unmade Spider-Man 4 incurred. Which would include buying out the contracts of Raimi and Maguire if they had pay-or-play deals on the unmade film(s).
__________________
"When David Marcus cited the great thinkers of history -- "Newton, Einstein, Surak" -- Newt Gingrich did not make his list." -- 24 January 2012

allyngibson.net
Allyn Gibson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 08:58 PM   #238
Mach5
Rear Admiral
 
Mach5's Avatar
 
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

I just heard that in Zagreb (Croatia) the video and audio were out of sync throughout most of the movie.


I'm curious, if something like that happened in the US, UK etc., would you guys ask for your money back?
__________________
"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines."
― Bertrand Russell
Mach5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9 2012, 08:59 PM   #239
RoJoHen
Awesome
 
RoJoHen's Avatar
 
Location: QC, IL, USA
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

If that happened, I would get up and tell someone and hope that they could fix it. If not, yes, I would absolutely ask for a refund.
__________________
I am the Quintessential Admiral.
RoJoHen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10 2012, 03:10 AM   #240
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

How broken is Gwen on the inside?

Why the the hell did she fall for the creepy kid who has mastabatory aids of her on his computer?

The stalker who follows her to work?

The rapists that tries to break into her bedroom window?

Or the sociopath who runs through the streets at night thrashing people to within an inch of their lives?

Why?

Not even daddy issues would explain this choice in a perfect mate who just might be minutes away into metamorphosing into a 20 foot tall carnivorous spider... Although?

If Peter did turn into a spider, at the climax of sex with Gwen, he would demand and insist that she eat him, so that he could get off too?

So I suppose it's less dangerous for her, if Peter turns into a spider than if he stays a man.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
spider-man

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.