|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Gaming Program Complete - Enter When Ready. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1876 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1877 |
|
Captain
Location: Bird of Prey - Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
Peter: Sorry Meg. Daddy loves ya, but Daddy also loves Star Trek, and in all fairness, Star Trek was here first. ------------------- Star Trek Online avatars - Bailey@Kahlua17, Scout@Kahlua17 |
|
|
|
|
|
#1878 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
“You do not use science in order to prove yourself right, you use science in order to become right” |
|
|
|
|
|
#1879 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1880 |
|
Shit Supreme
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY! |
|
|
|
|
#1881 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
KDF players in Kerrat. Granted, I only managed to blow up one Bird of Prey due to my low dps, but their combined firepower could not take me down.
__________________
USS Sentinel, Luna Class (STO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1882 |
|
Shit Supreme
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
ENOUGH OF THIS TURGID BASH WANKERY! |
|
|
|
|
#1883 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
|
|
|
|
|
#1884 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
![]() So I wanted to add another admiral level ship to my stable, and picked up an assault cruiser for a change from my fleet escort. But man, do those ships require a different set of BOff skills. As a result, I've expanded my BOff slots and added a couple more tactical officers whose abilities are more beam related rather than cannon. I think I'm going to go so far as to create a full bridge crew for both styles of ship--Cruiser and Escort. I'm not good in the assault cruiser yet. The borg blow me up so freaking fast. I can actually keep my escort intact for far longer. But I love the look of the Sovereign.
__________________
Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt. These are the tears of things, and the stuff of our mortality cuts us to the heart. An Informed Approximation |
|
|
|
|
|
#1885 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Yes, a BoP can sit in your torpedo blind spot, but then it has to deal with 6-8 beams which won't kill it instantly, but after it's initial resistances are gone will make it run like hell. And if you unleash a FAW II it's a sight to behold. Just say byebye to doing alot of burst damage. Depending on situation you can provide sustained support damage to keep your enemies on your toes, but mainly you can soak up so much damage in a Galaxy and/or heal your teammates while doing that. If played correctly the Galaxy is a phenomenal anchor in a battle for the rest of the fleet. It has so many engineering abilities, maybe even one to many... the last engineering ensign is a bit redundant, at least on the VA version. That's why you probably prefer the assault cruiser, starcruiser (has a sci ensign instead over the galaxy) or Odyssey if you got access to it. That said, even a Galaxy Class can give a BoP a little torpedo scare if you hit evasive and reverse engines to turn really fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1886 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
“You do not use science in order to prove yourself right, you use science in order to become right” |
|
|
|
|
|
#1887 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
USS Sentinel, Luna Class (STO) |
|
|
|
|
|
#1888 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
- Escorts put the "prey" in "Bird of Prey". Eng/Escort slightly more resilient prey. Defiants go boom, Hermeses go boom and Prometheuses go boom. - Tac/Cruisers=long fight, but they go boom eventually. - Eng/Cruisers or Sci/Cruisers=endless stalemate. - Science Vessels=I'm toast. Especially Sci/Sci. Anyway, while levelling my Sovereign char, I quite liked the upgrade to Galaxy. I don't understand how you'd feel weaker with a higher-tier ship, given all the upgrades it comes with (more BOFFs, Consoles, Weapons, Hull, Shields)... though yes, it does turns slowly. Just be glad it turns faster than a Bortas/Bortasqu'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1889 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: None Given
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
- Did you have an open Doff mission slot on the alt character? - Did you have the right Doffs needed to assign to it available? - Did you have 1000 unrefined Dilithium on that alt character? (it will only take 1000; no more and no less.) If the answer to the above was all 'yes', it's either a bug, or they changed something (which would suck.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1890 | |||
|
Captain
Location: Bird of Prey - Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
No offense taken, and thanks for the response.
__________________
Peter: Sorry Meg. Daddy loves ya, but Daddy also loves Star Trek, and in all fairness, Star Trek was here first. ------------------- Star Trek Online avatars - Bailey@Kahlua17, Scout@Kahlua17 |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| mmorpg, onlne, star trek online, sto |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.





















