All my ships in 1 place

[Kaiser]

Heres a ship i made for my Friend on another forum

[Kaiser]

Just a lil test of a Idea before i do the same with Excelsior class type parts from a different style of Parts

[Albertese]

I really like the Pip-class. But I have reservations about the Seaduck-class. If those structures beneath the saucer are pontoons for water landings, won't the nacelles be totally submerged? Is that okay for them? Also, it's been said that about a quarter of a starship's overall tonnage is its warp engines, so, would that make this thing a bit aft-heavy in the water? Seems like it's be dragged down by the engines and the bow would point more or less at the sky...

(Love the name though...I loved Tailspin since I was a kid! Best show on the Disney Afternoon!)

--Alex

[Kaiser]

Albertese wrote:

---

I really like the Pip-class. But I have reservations about the Seaduck-class. If those structures beneath the saucer are pontoons for water landings, won't the nacelles be totally submerged? Is that okay for them? Also, it's been said that about a quarter of a starship's overall tonnage is its warp engines, so, would that make this thing a bit aft-heavy in the water? Seems like it's be dragged down by the engines and the bow would point more or less at the sky...

(Love the name though...I loved Tailspin since I was a kid! Best show on the Disney Afternoon!)

--Alex

Thanks for the Comments and yes TailSpin is a good Cartoon Well id assume the weight of the 2 Oberth Class pods would be enough to level it out + the Warp nacelles would never be active in water id make sure theres a failsafe built in so the ship doesnt create a warp field in the water or the ship doesnt accidently go to warp in it.

[USS Fardell]

Kaiser wrote:

---

Well id assume the weight of the 2 Oberth Class pods would be enough to level it out + the Warp nacelles would never be active in water id make sure theres a failsafe built in so the ship doesnt create a warp field in the water or the ship doesnt accidently go to warp in it.

Either that, or saucer separation, somehow. (Need ventral, aft and fore veiws to be sure though.)

[Kaiser]

USS Fardell wrote:

---

Either that, or saucer separation, somehow. (Need ventral, aft and fore veiws to be sure though.)

Nope No Saucer sep in this one But if enough people i'll do a Front view of this later

[BK613]

Interesting and somewhat funky designs. I like the Pug. Lots of potential in that one...

[Kaiser]

BK613 wrote:

---

Interesting and somewhat funky designs. I like the Pug. Lots of potential in that one...

Thank you

[Kaiser]

I made this for a Friend on a Tiny Toons / Animaniacs Forum

Im doing the top view later ^_^

[YARN]

Kaiser wrote:

---

I made this for a Friend on a Tiny Toons / Animaniacs Forum

Im doing the top view later ^_^

Needs more guns...

[Kaiser]

YARN wrote:

---

Needs more guns...

It has enough ^_^ my next design will have more guns though

[publiusr]

I like that double saucer about midway down there with two stacked gangway ramps...

[Kaiser]

publiusr wrote:

---

I like that double saucer about midway down there with two stacked gangway ramps...

Thanks

[Kaiser]

Just a lil something i made for fun

[publiusr]

Use the pointed saucer and you have the galactica. I dig the broad arms.

Now I have often liked the idea of multi-bridge designs on really large craft. That aft refit-era bridge assembly is atop an extension. I'd like to see more of that.