|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#496 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Wherever you go, there you are.
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
"I'll see you in another life, brother." |
|
|
|
|
#497 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
#498 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#499 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
Joey Dakota (the CW) http://www.deadline.com/2012/03/jami...s-female-lead/
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#500 | |||
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
ABC's Beauty and the Beast
‘The River’s Paul Blackthorne Joins ‘Arrow’
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! Last edited by Enterprise is Great; March 2 2012 at 08:17 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#501 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#502 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#503 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#505 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
JJverse Star Trek...is gonna rock again! On May 17, 2013! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
So far, FOX has greenlit very few pilots compared with what it's going to need next fall, and none in the sf/f category. What are they going to put in the Friday night deathslots, aka the new home for sf/f? My hunch is that a few more orders will come in now, with some sf/f in the mix. FOX pilots so far. We've got the standard genres in the list: spy, lawyer, doctor, spy, cop. Here's what it has in the sf/f category that have not been picked up:
Maybe they can revive it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#507 |
|
Admiral
Location: Arizona, USA
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
__________________
Over the course of many encounters and many years, I have successfully developed a standard operating procedure for dealing with big, nasty monsters. Run away. Me and Monty Python. Harry Dresden - Blood Rites (The Dresden Files #6) |
|
|
|
|
#508 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
I never watched ER, so I have no idea what kind of actor he is. But this topic seems to call for a quirky, colorful David Duchovney type...anyone think Edwards fits? And now Amazon wants to produce shows. Netflix, Hulu and YouTube have already announced plans to do that. So has Yahoo, but considering the sad shape they're in, they might be rethinking any ambitious plans. Anyway, what are the odds that any of these people realize there's a huge opportunity to serve a very underserved market for space opera, and the nerds who like that genre are 100% reachable via the same internet that the companies already live on? How much more obvious and easy can you get, talk about low-hanging fruit! Last edited by Temis the Vorta; March 7 2012 at 07:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#509 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
|
|
|
|
|
#510 |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: Tatoinne
|
Re: sf/f TV development news - 2012
![]() The bonus to being the first to stick out your neck with made-for-streaming TV is that you'd also be the first to figure out how to make the money work. Right now they're stuck. Advertisers blanch at associating their products with online content (that's why YouTube is making "professional content" now) and consumers won't cought up bucks for subscriptions because they're used to getting everything free. TrekBBS could tell you all about the difficulty of "monetizing" online content. The micro-budget approach is self-defeating for space opera or any scripted content (talk shows, gossip shows and comedy are a different thing). There are dozens (hundreds?) of fan films and low budget attempts out there doing that, but who's making money? They need to at least come up to the level of professional TV series in order to compete. But if someone figures out the holy grail of either creating an abundant stream of inexpensive yet advertiser-friendly content or creating content that consumers will actually pay for - or both - will have the advantage. Until their competitors copy them, of course. So to lock in your lead, it needs to be something uncopyable. And from what I can tell, all content on the internet is copyable, particularly by the well-heeled megacorporations who will quickly horn in on any promising new business opportunity. But you can't copy a community. They should start with the audience - that's the product and their unique advantage. Create the community first, then build the content around the community. Your competitors can try to copy your content and steal your advertisers but as long as you keep your community happy, and out there recruiting new community members, you'll be safe, well as safe as anyone ever is. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.












Maybe they can revive it?




