RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,940
Posts: 5,479,064
Members: 25,056
Currently online: 437
Newest member: JeremiahJT

TrekToday headlines

Trek Shirt And Hoodie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

A Klingon Christmas Carol’s Last Season
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

Attack Wing Wave 10 Expansion Pack
By: T'Bonz on Nov 27

New Star Trek Funko Pop! Vinyl Figures
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

QMx Mini Phaser Ornament
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Stewart as Neo-Nazi Skinhead
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Klingon Bloodwine To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Trek Actors In War Of The Worlds Fundraiser
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek: The Next Generation Gag Reel Tease
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24

Shatner In Haven
By: T'Bonz on Nov 24


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 7 2012, 05:50 PM   #886
Samurai8472
Vice Admiral
 
Samurai8472's Avatar
 
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Another shot of the Aston

http://fr.cinema.yahoo.com/blogs/act...fficielle.html

Samurai8472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 06:03 PM   #887
23skidoo
Admiral
 
Location: Fifth Circle of Hell
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Yeah, given that we've had a blond Bond, I don't see hair colour as being an issue any more.
Oh I dunno - I still hear people complaining about that 6 years later.

If I had to lay odds I'd put it at about 90% likelihood that whenever Craig moves on and a new Bond is cast, the choice will be someone who isn't actually on any of the lists! (Same goes for the twelfth Doctor Who.)

Alex
__________________
"These are historical documents - preserving them is important. Tarting them up for a night out in the twenty-first century is unnecessary" - Toby Hadoke, "Should mistakes in old episodes of Doctor Who be fixed on DVD" (Doctor Who Magazine #445)
23skidoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 06:17 PM   #888
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

^ I agree with you about that. Back when Brosnan was still the incumbent and we used to have 'Next James Bond' threads here, Daniel Craig never once was mentioned.

Brosnan was always going to be in the running to replace Dalton, but I don't think there's anyone that obvious out there at the minute.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 07:00 PM   #889
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gotham
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

IIRC there were tons of us pulling for Colin Salmon to get the role. I know I was, unlikely as it was going to be, he'd still be awesome as Bond. Yeah, I don't remember Craig's name coming up. He wasn't really that well known at the time obviously. I think he'd only done the excellent Matthew Vaughn flick "Layer Cake".
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 10:29 PM   #890
Rush Limborg
Vice Admiral
 
Rush Limborg's Avatar
 
Location: The EIB Network
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Samurai8472 wrote: View Post
SO...looks like they're going retro, with this Bond! In Casino and QoS, he had a modern Aston Martin...but now...the DB5 is back, eh?
__________________
"The saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia.... 'Needs and abilities' are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to 'the State shall take, the State shall give'."
--David Mamet
Rush Limborg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 11:05 PM   #891
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

He did have the DB5 in Casino Royale...wonder if its supposed to be the same one?
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7 2012, 11:05 PM   #892
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Admiral_Young wrote: View Post
IIRC there were tons of us pulling for Colin Salmon to get the role. I know I was, unlikely as it was going to be, he'd still be awesome as Bond. Yeah, I don't remember Craig's name coming up. He wasn't really that well known at the time obviously. I think he'd only done the excellent Matthew Vaughn flick "Layer Cake".
Chalk me up as someone else who'd have been very interested to see Salmon as Bond.
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 12:14 AM   #893
DevilEyes
Rear Admiral
 
DevilEyes's Avatar
 
Location: basking in the warmth of the Fire Caves
View DevilEyes's Twitter Profile
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Yeah, given that we've had a blond Bond, I don't see hair colour as being an issue any more.
The incessant whining about Craig's hair color was IMO one of the most absurd quasi-controversies of the last decade.

I remember that Clive Owen was mentioned a lot as a possible Bond - but I'm not sure he was ever wild about the idea. I'm not sure that some of the actors mentioned, like Fassbender, will want to play Bond - he has established himself as a serious actor who does versatile roles, but any actor who gets to play Bond risks being forever identified by that role. It's a very risky move. Then again, if X-Men:First Class gets several more sequels, playing Bond may help him not be over-identified as Magneto, kind of like McKellen avoided being identified by the wide public by just one iconic big franchise role, since he played both Gandalf and Magnero.
__________________
Treason, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

my Buffy/Angel rewatch
DevilEyes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 12:22 AM   #894
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

DevilEyes wrote: View Post
I remember that Clive Owen was mentioned a lot as a possible Bond - but I'm not sure he was ever wild about the idea.
Owen basically became the Internet's darling after Croupier and his BMW commercial, but it's my understanding that he never auditioned, nor was he ever under consideration, to be Bond after Brosnan's departure. Him always being a front-runner was little more than the Internet's version of the telephone game.
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 12:58 AM   #895
23skidoo
Admiral
 
Location: Fifth Circle of Hell
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

I think Clive Owen as interested in Bond. If you want a hint of how he might have played it, check out his Bond spoof in the first Steve Martin Pink Panther film (best part of the movie, IMO).

Alex
__________________
"These are historical documents - preserving them is important. Tarting them up for a night out in the twenty-first century is unnecessary" - Toby Hadoke, "Should mistakes in old episodes of Doctor Who be fixed on DVD" (Doctor Who Magazine #445)
23skidoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 01:56 AM   #896
Samurai8472
Vice Admiral
 
Samurai8472's Avatar
 
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Starkers wrote: View Post
He did have the DB5 in Casino Royale...wonder if its supposed to be the same one?
Well he won it in Casino Royale. That might be the only connection to that movie.

Samurai8472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 02:35 AM   #897
Rush Limborg
Vice Admiral
 
Rush Limborg's Avatar
 
Location: The EIB Network
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Lets hope it had "modifications"....
__________________
"The saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia.... 'Needs and abilities' are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to 'the State shall take, the State shall give'."
--David Mamet
Rush Limborg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 02:41 AM   #898
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably residing in the meat packing district
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

^ I hoping not, one of things i like most about the last two films is the lack of the Q-branch's "little toys."

The next film can only be made better by their continued absence.

__________________
.
TOS, TNG and VGR never mentioned a "Federation President."
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 02:51 AM   #899
Rush Limborg
Vice Admiral
 
Rush Limborg's Avatar
 
Location: The EIB Network
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

Well, the "modern" Aston in Casino had a few things--a selection of gadgets we get a brief glimpse of when he pulls out the defribrilator.

At any rate--have believable modifications--ones that you can accept are there. An oil slick isn't too far-fetched, to be honest.
__________________
"The saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia.... 'Needs and abilities' are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to 'the State shall take, the State shall give'."
--David Mamet
Rush Limborg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 8 2012, 02:58 AM   #900
Samurai8472
Vice Admiral
 
Samurai8472's Avatar
 
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!

The gun compartment was believeable. The defibrillator was just there to serve a purpose later in the movie.

That's how most Bond gadgets are really.
Samurai8472 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
007, james bond

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.