RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,643
Posts: 5,427,948
Members: 24,811
Currently online: 428
Newest member: Damix

TrekToday headlines

Trek Messenger Bag
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

Star Trek Live In Concert In Australia
By: T'Bonz on Sep 18

IDW Publishing December Trek Comics
By: T'Bonz on Sep 17

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Art

Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 30 2012, 08:58 PM   #61
Mysterion
Rear Admiral
 
Mysterion's Avatar
 
Location: SB-31, Daran V
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

aridas sofia wrote: View Post
But there would be another type of ship- a warship- that would have very different priorities and have a very small crew. Its range and endurance would be short-medium. No saucer. Just raw shields, speed and weaponry, in differing proportions as the design demands.
So, basically, the Defiant from Deep Space Nine? Or the perimeter action ships from the FRS corner of the universe. either way, works for me and wish we'd seen more of its like on-screen.
__________________
USS Galileo Galilei, NCC-8888
Prima Inter Pares
Mysterion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30 2012, 08:59 PM   #62
Wingsley
Commodore
 
Wingsley's Avatar
 
Location: Wingsley
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

^ Is that expressly what "ablative armor" means? I was wondering if maybe it could imply that the Federation was investing its time and effort into newer hull technologies/materials that would simply be more impervious to incoming weapons fire than traditional hull would be. (Maybe developed from the Kalandans' diburnium-osmium alloy or something like that.)
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..."
-- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme.
Wingsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30 2012, 09:22 PM   #63
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

^That would just be "armor". "Ablative armor" is a specific type that diffuses damage by ablating.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30 2012, 10:08 PM   #64
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Yeah, "Ablate" only means one thing, I'm afraid. And I think the DS9 & Voyager writers eventually started using the word at random because it sounded cool.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30 2012, 10:09 PM   #65
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Now, a starship with reactive armor, that would be an exciting space battle!
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 12:55 AM   #66
The Castellan
Commodore
 
The Castellan's Avatar
 
Location: The Plains of Cydonia
Send a message via Yahoo to The Castellan
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Forbin wrote: View Post
Ar-Pharazon wrote: View Post

Has there been any rendering of a "refit" that had that mirrored top & bottom of the primary hull?

That's the first thing that stands out to me.
Kinda - I used the tops of two Reliants for this:
http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbas...page_lion.html



Schematic:
http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...p-1920-021.jpg

Would be funny if it only has one bathroom.
The Castellan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 01:52 AM   #67
Ar-Pharazon
Rear Admiral
 
Ar-Pharazon's Avatar
 
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

^ And it's waaaaaay at the back, like a jet.
__________________
Rimmer, on what period of history to live in-
“Well, It’d be the 19th century for me, one of Napoleon’s marshals.
The chance to march across Europe with the greatest general of all time and kill Belgians” - (White Hole).
Ar-Pharazon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 04:33 AM   #68
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 05:41 AM   #69
Wingsley
Commodore
 
Wingsley's Avatar
 
Location: Wingsley
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

I have a perfect substitute name for the Coeur de Leon: "Sur le Dessus"!
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..."
-- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme.
Wingsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 01:52 PM   #70
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

"On the top?"
Not sure I get it...

(The crew calls her "Big Dick," by the way .
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 31 2012, 10:20 PM   #71
Wingsley
Commodore
 
Wingsley's Avatar
 
Location: Wingsley
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Well, it should be "over the top". But maybe it gets lost in the translation...
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..."
-- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme.
Wingsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2012, 02:57 AM   #72
Robert Simmons
Commander
 
Robert Simmons's Avatar
 
Location: In the middle of all of you....
View Robert Simmons's Twitter Profile
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Since the Dreadnought is of the Frans Joseph Universe I wish cautiously float an opinion which may not fly here. I'll base my comments in SFB fleet management since it is platformed on the back of FJ. Since the FJ dreadnought was the pinnacle of non-X class technology, when the X-class technology was rolled out in the TMP refit the dreadnoughts were deemed to new and too expensive to be worthy of the X-class upgrade. ( But the DN hull still saw the DN+ and the DNG upgrade to address it's initial design shortfalls.. ) With the X-class technology making old cruisers more powerful to where a Fed CA now with the warp and weapon's amplification now can match a dreadnought and smaller ships can now deliver the same performance. In other words old worn out hulls the Star Fleet can afford to gamble with on an experimental refit will get the upgrade while top of the line risky to gamble with reliable front line status would not.

I'm of the opinion that the FJ Dreadnought would not be upgraded due to the expense of upgrading the most valuable expensive hull class when the next marginally smaller new class with newer technology can match the capability of the Fed DN. Newer is cheaper to build for the capability than totally overhauling a top of the line in service unit while on active duty that would not match the capability of the newer X-class technology for the capital expenditure. One less sentry guarding the front line if you do, and a whole lot more expensive if you do exercise the option. Double loss. FWIW...
__________________
Whatever you choose to do in life, don't lie or deceive to achieve it.

Last edited by Robert Simmons; February 1 2012 at 03:28 AM.
Robert Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2012, 04:08 AM   #73
Wingsley
Commodore
 
Wingsley's Avatar
 
Location: Wingsley
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Family Dog wrote: View Post
Since the Dreadnought is of the Frans Joseph Universe I wish cautiously float an opinion which may not fly here. I'll base my comments in SFB fleet management since it is platformed on the back of FJ. Since the FJ dreadnought was the pinnacle of non-X class technology, when the X-class technology was rolled out in the TMP refit the dreadnoughts were deemed to new and too expensive to be worthy of the X-class upgrade. ( But the DN hull still saw the DN+ and the DNG upgrade to address it's initial design shortfalls.. ) With the X-class technology making old cruisers more powerful to where a Fed CA now with the warp and weapon's amplification now can match a dreadnought and smaller ships can now deliver the same performance. In other words old worn out hulls the Star Fleet can afford to gamble with on an experimental refit will get the upgrade while top of the line risky to gamble with reliable front line status would not.

I'm of the opinion that the FJ Dreadnought would not be upgraded due to the expense of upgrading the most valuable expensive hull class when the next marginally smaller new class with newer technology can match the capability of the Fed DN. Newer is cheaper to build for the capability than totally overhauling a top of the line in service unit while on active duty that would not match the capability of the newer X-class technology for the capital expenditure. One less sentry guarding the front line if you do, and a whole lot more expensive if you do exercise the option. Double loss. FWIW...
Actually, what you are saying is a very logical approach that fits well with STAR TREK cannon. In TMP, the refit Enterprise was called "an almost entirely new" ship. Years later, the new NX-2000 Excelsior was called "the Great Experiment". If upgrading to a heavier platform with more bulk, weapons, and nacelles was the answer to bolstering the Federation fleet militarily, why wouldn't the new Enterprise or Excelsior adopt the dreadnought philosophy... unless the refit Enterprise and NX-2000 Excelsior were the virtual dreadnoughts of their respective days in the first place?

I'm not dismissing the possibility of the Federation deploying a limited-production warships, but if Sisko's Defiant is any indication, a Federation warship of the TMP/pre-TNG era would likely be a relatively small, simpler design. So maybe the Federation's idea of a battlewagon would be more like a suped-up destroyer-like ship. (Kirov with armor?)
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..."
-- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme.
Wingsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2012, 04:14 AM   #74
Robert Simmons
Commander
 
Robert Simmons's Avatar
 
Location: In the middle of all of you....
View Robert Simmons's Twitter Profile
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Well yes in a nutshell. What I laid out boils down to being more efficient with less. It does not necessarily follow that it would lead to bigger, but fielding such smaller ship in the face of an opponent's bigger damage sponge ship, they would need to bulk them out to absorb more damage and to take the greater stress the stronger engines would place on the hull. Having a more compact hull with engines up against the hull.....with the newer stronger engines would be smart for hull strength( if a stronger warp field up against the ship doesn't fry everyone on board first...) , but would kill you in a more sluggish turn mode in the tradeoff due to less leverage the engines would have on the hull. (downside....less tactical maneuverability...bad news in a close in toe to toe knife fight...downside you have to burn way more power to keep parity in manuveurability in a close in fight....not smart with larger hulls that are more sluggish....) Compact would be the way to go with maxed out shield capabilties. But to cram that much more power int oa hull means you have to compromise and going up in size in that early an era is gonna be near impossible to avoid. So your idea of a Kirov would be feasible if it weren't for the fact that at looking at the picture it would most likely also not qualify for the upgrade due to it sporting the DN secondary hull which kicks it up into a larger size class which would disqualify it as a DN hull. ( Although it more qualifies as a Fed CVA / CS strike carrier with a smaller power curve since it lacks the 3rd warp engine. ) The Kirov pictured here is pretty but would most likely be passed on the upgrade due to being too big and being too valuable unit to pull out of service for the upgrade. That is why ( I believe ) the in the FJ SFB universe the Fed BCH and variants ( New Jersey, Montana, Kirov, Shri Lanka, etc.... ) filled the vacuum of the lack of DN's and CVA's till the cheaper CX conversion came online in the TMP refit. ( CX<DN cost )

Whereas the Fed CA to CX TMP conversion is flirting with that sort of upgrade, the Excelsior is out of the box bigger and designed to dish and take more than the CX frame plussed out could. THe Excelsior would more qualify SUPERCEDING a true FJ dreadnought in size and in power despite a smaller size ship with the newer technology could match parity with a DN which would be less. Or in simpler terms....a Excelsior is > CX upgrade due to the disporportionate leap of superiority designed / built into it from the start. ( a simple force multiplier scale for comparison.....CA=1, BCH= 1.4 DN=1.5, CX=1.75, 2nd gen CXX+ tech{ Excelsior}=2.75 )
.
.
.
__________________
Whatever you choose to do in life, don't lie or deceive to achieve it.

Last edited by Robert Simmons; February 1 2012 at 05:20 AM.
Robert Simmons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1 2012, 04:28 AM   #75
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: Refit Dreadnought.... Question?

Wingsley wrote: View Post
Well, it should be "over the top". But maybe it gets lost in the translation...
Ah! It's been 30 years since high school French, and Bablefish failed me.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.