RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,355
Posts: 5,503,070
Members: 25,121
Currently online: 548
Newest member: MsMarrielle

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 6 2011, 07:45 AM   #1
The Overlord
Captain
 
Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

It seemed by the TNG era of Star Trek, Gene Roddenberry had a bunch of rules on what should and shouldn't be a Star Trek show. Some of these rules made sense, like no smoking in the future and humans not being prejudiced, while others made no sense, like the fact there can be no inter personal conflict amongst the crew or there can't be space pirates. What other odd rules were there and did you think these rules limited story telling potential?
The Overlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 12:02 PM   #2
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

When he started making rules like "the nacelles have to be in pairs" just to spite his (former) friend Franz Joseph and discredit his old Star Fleet Technical Manual, that was when he'd lost sight of what mattered.

I still smile every time I see a ship with one or three nacelles in Trek. Pettiness fail!
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 03:22 PM   #3
plynch
Commodore
 
plynch's Avatar
 
Location: Outer Graceland
View plynch's Twitter Profile
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

I think the rules are more from the beginning of TNG, since he died during it. The crew all getting along made for a band ship. Except for Pulaski, who was there in S2, while GR was still pretty involved iirc. Maybe we overestimate Trek's adherence to his rules.
__________________
Author of Live Like Louis! Inspirational Stories from the Life of Louis Armstrong, http://livelikelouis.com
plynch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 03:47 PM   #4
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

never mind

Last edited by Merry Christmas; November 6 2011 at 04:07 PM.
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 04:02 PM   #5
Relayer1
Rear Admiral
 
Relayer1's Avatar
 
Location: The Black Country, England
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

While credit must be given to Gene for his starting the whole thing and setting it on its course, he certainly became a big part of what was wrong with it too...
__________________
Soon oh soon the light, Pass within and soothe this endless night, And wait here for you, Our reason to be here...
Relayer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 04:48 PM   #6
The Dominion
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

I can understand not wanting space pirates to steal to the show, but why ban them completely?
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. ~ Voltaire
The Dominion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 04:59 PM   #7
M'rk, son of Mogh
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

I think some of these may have just been to help the writers stay more creative and not rely on simple crutches.

Space pirates being one of them, maybe it helped them to focus more on the "sci-fi" than a simple "and we're attacked by pirates" story?

Despite that, though, the trappings of that idea were still used, just disguised. "Rascals" was basically space pirates taking over the ship story, only the pirates were Ferengi. "The Vengeance Factor" also had a version of space pirates. "The Outrageous Okana" was a roguish space-pirate. And, of course, the "Gambit" two parter (I'm focusing mostly on TNG here)

At the same time, we saw disagreements with the crew often enough. Riker wasn't exactly obeying orders in "The Outcast". For one of a thousand examples (no idea why that's the first example I thought of).

Just because we hear about these rules doesn't mean they were followed. There's a bit of an exaggeration involved it seems.
M'rk, son of Mogh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 6 2011, 05:27 PM   #8
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Ferguson, Missouri, USA
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

M'rk, son of Mogh wrote: View Post
I think some of these may have just been to help the writers stay more creative and not rely on simple crutches.

Space pirates being one of them, maybe it helped them to focus more on the "sci-fi" than a simple "and we're attacked by pirates" story?

Despite that, though, the trappings of that idea were still used, just disguised. "Rascals" was basically space pirates taking over the ship story, only the pirates were Ferengi. "The Vengeance Factor" also had a version of space pirates. "The Outrageous Okana" was a roguish space-pirate. And, of course, the "Gambit" two parter (I'm focusing mostly on TNG here)

At the same time, we saw disagreements with the crew often enough. Riker wasn't exactly obeying orders in "The Outcast". For one of a thousand examples (no idea why that's the first example I thought of).

Just because we hear about these rules doesn't mean they were followed. There's a bit of an exaggeration involved it seems.
Yep. It's not like there was a whole lot of interpersonal conflict in TOS anyway. With a couple of notable exceptions, most of it was confined to bickering between Spock and McCoy, which more often than not amounted to ribbing between them.

With TNG, most character conflicts among crewmembers were on a professional nature rather than personal one, IMO, and were generally resolved without someone being stunned by a phaser or tossed head-first over a table.
__________________
"Don't sweat the small stuff--it makes you small-minded..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 7 2011, 11:27 AM   #9
Mr Silver
Rear Admiral
 
Location: UK
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

The Ferengi were pretty much depicted as "space pirates" in their first appearances. Roddenberry was still involved with the show at this time and I think that pretty much renders that "rule" void.

It seems that the main thing that Roddenberry was against was depicting the Federation at war. He reasoned that war was something that the humans of Trek would have left behind and therefore there would always be ways for the Federation to settle any conflict without going to war.

He was also really against any internal plotting and conspiracies where the Federation was concerned. The episode "Conspiracy" of TNG's first season was originally going to be about an actually conspiracy that was free of alien influence. According to some sources, Roddenberry wouldn't allow this and it was rewritten to include the alien invasion. It's also claimed that Roddenberry had been screened TUC just prior to his death and when the film had concluded he planned on contacting his lawyers. Others say that Roddenberry enjoyed the movie, despite it's "anti-trek" plot.

The Dominion War arc in DS9 was something that had never been done in Star Trek and it was a big risk. Fortunately, the risk paid off and many consider the arc to have produced some of the finest episodes of the franchise. The episode "In The Pale Moonlight" is considered by some to be the greatest episode of the franchise, despite it being almost completely "non-trek".

Apparently, Roddenberry disagreed with the decision to kill off Spock in TWOK so much, that he was rumored to have leaked the death scene to the media with the hope that fans would boycott the movie. I'm not sure what his motivations for doing this would be, but perhaps not having any decision in killing off a character that he created may have served as a reason if this story is true.
Mr Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2011, 09:28 PM   #10
milo bloom
Fleet Captain
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Location: The varied and beautiful Chicagoland suburbs.
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

Admiral M wrote: View Post
He was also really against any internal plotting and conspiracies where the Federation was concerned. The episode "Conspiracy" of TNG's first season was originally going to be about an actually conspiracy that was free of alien influence. According to some sources, Roddenberry wouldn't allow this and it was rewritten to include the alien invasion. It's also claimed that Roddenberry had been screened TUC just prior to his death and when the film had concluded he planned on contacting his lawyers. Others say that Roddenberry enjoyed the movie, despite it's "anti-trek" plot.
.
That's always seemed odd to me. It's a great Trek story of the Federation finally making peace with a longtime enemy.
__________________
'Tis a lie! Thy backside is whole and ungobbled, thou ungrateful whelp!
milo bloom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2011, 10:13 PM   #11
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

IIRC, Rodenberry hated the idea that any humans in the 23rd century, let alone James T. Kirk, would be racist. His humans were supposedly beyond all that.
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2011, 10:15 PM   #12
number6
Vice Admiral
 
Location: number6 has left the village through some inexpicable hole in the ground to head the corporation.
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

He liked interviewing all the women personally for a part in the show.
number6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2011, 11:11 PM   #13
JRoss
Captain
 
JRoss's Avatar
 
Location: Stain'd-by-the-Sea
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

KingDaniel wrote: View Post
When he started making rules like "the nacelles have to be in pairs" just to spite his (former) friend Franz Joseph and discredit his old Star Fleet Technical Manual, that was when he'd lost sight of what mattered.

I still smile every time I see a ship with one or three nacelles in Trek. Pettiness fail!
Hmm, I just assumed that this was so that the ships wouldn't look ugly.
__________________
Thunderegg Productions, a new indie publisher of RPG supplements
JRoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 8 2011, 11:35 PM   #14
Olive, the Other Reindeer
Vice Admiral
 
Olive, the Other Reindeer's Avatar
 
Location: scotpens
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

Relayer1 wrote: View Post
While credit must be given to Gene for his starting the whole thing and setting it on its course, he certainly became a big part of what was wrong with it too...
You mean like the "no money" thing?
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?”
Olive, the Other Reindeer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 9 2011, 12:40 AM   #15
Paradon
Rear Admiral
 
Paradon's Avatar
 
Location: Huckleberry Hound;California Love;the golden state
Re: Gene Roddenberry's weird rules

Humans can't be prejudice in the 23rd and 24th century, really? Everybody is prejudice in some way. You just have to open your eyes and listen more, then you'll realize how prejudice you are. [chuckle] People do things because they think they have a good reason(s). There are something you don't understand about someone and then there are something nobody understands about you. I don't have to completely understand someone to like, or love, them for this reason. But some people are just more extreme than others and there will always be people like that. That's why we need the government to back off and stop telling us what to do in case of extremists get voted into office and start doing some serious shit that will destroy this country and maybe the world altogether.
__________________
"This is not about who has the biggest gun or more powerful ships... A friend in power is a friend lost."

Last edited by Paradon; November 9 2011 at 01:56 AM.
Paradon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
gene roddenberry, rules

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.