|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#466 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
"Inception" is a layer cake. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#467 |
|
Admiral
Location: Behind enemy lines...
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Star Trek Into Darkness review The Devils of Amber Street |
|
|
|
|
#468 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
|
|
|
|
|
#469 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: The EIB Network
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
As for the title song...I say it's high time we go back to the "jazzy" style of the '60s Bond films. If not Shirley Bassey--at least someone to emulate that style. (Tragically, Amy is no longer with us...but you get the idea.)
__________________
"I have been wounded but not yet slain. I shall lie here and bleed awhile. Then I shall rise and fight again." "Forget it, Jake...it's Chinatown." |
|
|
|
|
#470 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
I'm just happy that we're finally getting another Bond film. Now that we have a confirmed title for the movie, any chance we could get a thread retitle?
|
|
|
|
|
#471 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
|
|
|
|
|
#473 |
|
Admiral
Location: Fifth Circle of Hell
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
I just hope they don't forget that Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace were intended to be the first 2 parts of a trilogy. Both films left a number of story threads hanging, though that said while QoS got away with being set an hour after Casino Royale ended, it will be harder to rationalize Skyfall taking place immediately after QoS yet made 6 years later. So hopefully the Bond we see in Skyfall will be one who has 6 years of additional experience as opposed to the still-wet-behind-the-ears Double-O we had in the last 2 films. Indeed, if you compare year-to-year, if Skyfall takes place in 2012, 6 years after the on-screen date of Casino Royale, Craig's Bond should by now have encountered Blofeld, done the LECTER tango with Tatiana Romanova and Red Grant, and loved and lost Tracey. If I were EON, I'd push to have Bond 24 commissioned quickly with a release date to restore some confidence in the series. We're in the era of film series being made back to back, anyway, so they could set in on Bond 24 for a 1963 release (50th anniversary of From Russia With Love), confirm Daniel Craig for another outing now, eliminating some of the "is he going to stay on" speculation, and start filming it right after Skyfall is done. Re: Richard Arnold. He does a good job, but there are others who would do well if he didn't come back. Murray Gold comes to mind, and Bear whats-his-name who composed for Battlestar Galactica. John Barry didn't score every "classic era" Bond - indeed two of the more striking scores in the series were done by others - Bill Conti's For Your Eyes Only and Monty Norman did most of Dr. No (we'll put the James Bond Theme debate to the side for a moment). A one-off by someone else could be quite refreshing. Or they could pull a rabbit out the hat and snag someone like John Williams, just to be different. Alex
__________________
"These are historical documents - preserving them is important. Tarting them up for a night out in the twenty-first century is unnecessary" - Toby Hadoke, "Should mistakes in old episodes of Doctor Who be fixed on DVD" (Doctor Who Magazine #445) |
|
|
|
|
#474 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Broccoli
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
QoS was not a direct follow-up to CR until after CR hit and TPTB liked what they saw. Only then did they expand on the CR plot line. QoS had its ending re-edited, intentionally so the series wouldn't be locked into having the next film be a follow-up.
__________________
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." -- Christopher Hitchens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#475 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
|
|
#476 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
Michael G Wilson- "The worst kept secret in London" *Title is revealed* lol
__________________
"Inception" is a layer cake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#477 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
|
|
|
|
|
#478 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: The Wired
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
"Formidable, are the World Delicacy Noodles." Chachamaru-Negima!? |
|
|
|
|
#479 | ||
|
Admiral
Location: Behind enemy lines...
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
Personally I think Qauntum's major strength was that nobody knew it existed, now its in the full light of day I see it being much less of a threat. Rather looking forward to a stand alone 007 adventure...
__________________
Werewolves on the Moon Now with Star Trek Into Darkness review The Devils of Amber Street |
||
|
|
|
|
#480 |
|
The Doctor
|
Re: "James Bond 23" officially slated for 2012!
__________________
"Eccleston was a tiger and Tennant was, well, Tigger. Smith [is] an uncoordinated housecat who pretends that he meant to do that after falling off a piece of furniture." - Lynne M. Thomas "I'm in Hell and it's full of Avons!" - Vila |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 007, james bond |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:06 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.













Now that we have a confirmed title for the movie, any chance we could get a thread retitle?









