RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,568
Posts: 5,423,257
Members: 24,809
Currently online: 507
Newest member: Dobian

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Coto Drama Sold To Fox
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Braga Inks Deal
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12

Remastered Original Series Re-release
By: T'Bonz on Sep 11

UK Trek Ships Calendar Debuts
By: T'Bonz on Sep 10


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 24 2011, 06:09 PM   #1
Xerxes1979
Captain
 
Xerxes1979's Avatar
 
Location: Gamma Hydra Section 10
How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Terrel originally thought that structures were remains of a crashed ship, implying that the structure was not fabricated on the surface of the planet.

These modules must have been atleast the size of a bus. What I want to know is did the Enterprise have sufficient internal volume to account for these cargo bays?

I rather like the look of the cargo pallet system in TMP, but those box shaped containers where much smaller than the freight car sized containers in TWOK.

Was the Khan encampment built on site or floated down from the original Enterprise via anti-grav?
__________________
"Your knowledge of Klingon curses is impressive. But, as the Romulans might say, only a Veruul would use such language in public"
Xerxes1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 06:30 PM   #2
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

I thought they were the Botany Bay's cargo containers - hence "SS Botany Bay" being written on the seat belt (?) strap.
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 06:41 PM   #3
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

SpookingDaniel wrote: View Post
I thought they were the Botany Bay's cargo containers - hence "SS Botany Bay" being written on the seat belt (?) strap.
Mike Okuda specifically stated that they were cargo containers from the Enterprise. They were just filled with the Botany Bay's stuff.

Now granted, the internal volume of the containers we saw in the movie seems to be a bit larger than your average cargo container:

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__...rgo_crates.jpg

...but that was probably fudged for the movie's sake. I remember a picture in Starlog magazine showing the cast and crew in front of the exterior of the cargo containers on Ceti Alpha V, and they looked like the above pic.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 06:56 PM   #4
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

IIRC, Mike Okuda didn't have a thing to do with STII. And more to the point, why would they go back to the Bontany Bay and fit the seatbelts/cargo straps from that ship to an Enterprise cargo container?

The Botany Bay was designed with detachable cargo modules. I always assumed it was one of them.
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 07:02 PM   #5
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

SpookingDaniel wrote: View Post
IIRC, Mike Okuda didn't have a thing to do with STII.
He might have possessed background information that you and I don't have. I'm sure he can correct me if I'm wrong. Quite frankly, if anyone has that Starlog pic I referenced, you'd be able to tell right away that they're cargo containers as seen in TMP.

*EDIT* Here's a pic I found from a trading card (sorry it's so small):

http://www.wixiban.com/images/roddenberry/11-16.jpg

Compare this pic to the pic from my previous post. You can clearly see the clamps on the tops of the containers, and the port in front where a workbee would go.

And more to the point, why would they go back to the Bontany Bay and fit the seatbelts/cargo straps from that ship to an Enterprise cargo container?
So that Chekov could conveniently find something with the ship's name written on it?

The Botany Bay was designed with detachable cargo modules. I always assumed it was one of them.
Was it ever canonically stated that that wrap-around piece underneath that submarine hull were cargo containers?
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin

Last edited by Boo-khat; October 24 2011 at 07:56 PM.
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 07:34 PM   #6
DrBashir
Commander
 
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

According to this screencap they had a maximum capcity of 42.5 cubic meters.

http://db.tt/CsfF2xjn
DrBashir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 08:39 PM   #7
22 Stars
Commodore
 
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Why would a cargo container have seatbelts at all? Who is riding around in a cargo container?

As has been stated, the cargo containers built for ST II were designed from the miniature linked to above from TMP.
22 Stars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 24 2011, 09:06 PM   #8
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

22 Stars wrote: View Post
Why would a cargo container have seatbelts at all? Who is riding around in a cargo container?
The seatbelts were not from the cargo containers. They were from the Botany Bay. And who knows why they were taken from that ship? Souvenirs?
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2011, 12:43 AM   #9
UssGlenn
Captain
 
UssGlenn's Avatar
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Logically, they recovered the Botany Bay and took it apart to give Khan and his followers the maximum amount of raw material to use to survive. This was supplemented by supplies and cargo from the Enterprise. There would be lots of crossover of material as they built stuff.
__________________
"What are you going to do?"
"I don't know. I'm making this up as I go."
UssGlenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2011, 02:24 AM   #10
22 Stars
Commodore
 
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Boo-khat wrote: View Post
22 Stars wrote: View Post
Why would a cargo container have seatbelts at all? Who is riding around in a cargo container?
The seatbelts were not from the cargo containers. They were from the Botany Bay. And who knows why they were taken from that ship? Souvenirs?
Oh I agree, i was speaking to people who thought they were Botany Bay cargo containers with built in seatbelts
22 Stars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2011, 09:48 AM   #11
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

TOS-R sort of puts this to rest by explicitly showing how the Botany Bay is abandoned in space, cargo containers (or whatever those five remaining wedges out of an apparent maximum of 16 are - fuel tanks, perhaps?) and all, long before the action moves to Ceti Alpha.

Kirk probably wouldn't bother to go back to that ship just to get Khan some survival goods that the Enterprise could easily provide herself. And Khan doesn't appear to have all that much stuff down on the planet anyway. Quite possibly, just a few crates of Khan's personal belongings, books and the like, were beamed from Botany Bay to Enterprise while the two ships were flying in formation, either by Kirk or then later by Khan. And perhaps a few of those were strapped together with belts containing the originating ship's name.

Alternately, those containers being hauled around by workbees in ST:TMP are in fact an old model, its standardization going back all the way to the 1990s, and thus the Botany Bay happened to have some aboard, too. Many of the cargo straps inside the containers seem to serve no function other than hanging from appropriate fixtures - sort of suggesting they are scenery coming with the rusty walls, rather than vital items carefully removed from the Botany Bay and installed here for a purpose.

The size issue is IMHO easily fudged. The containers offer standing height here:

http://movies.trekcore.com/gallery/a.../tmphd0391.jpg

And the ones in which Khan lives are obviously "double-enders", with two curved walls, as per the above picture featuring the wall stenciling. If the interior height is still a tad too much to be plausible (it's about twice the ST:TMP height!), we can argue that Khan removed the bottoms of the containers and placed the tops on solid stone foundations, and the floor we (fail to) see is actually in a pit.

Or then the containers simply come in a variety of sizes. Added height wouldn't inconvenience the workbees hauling these things, nor would it affect the stacking of the containers on the floor of a starship cargo hold, or on assorted other flatbeds. It would simply make the higher containers incompatible with the fancy wall sockets, but that may be of little concern overall.

Also, at least some bits of the containers did explicitly come from Starfleet, as per this pic...

http://movies.trekcore.com/gallery/a...twokhd0214.jpg

But the piece Khan is using as a door here need not necessarily be related to the containers themselves; apparently, the piece is a later add-on.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2011, 10:00 AM   #12
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Oh, and forgot about this...

Was the Khan encampment built on site or floated down from the original Enterprise via anti-grav?
Let's look at this one again (thanks, Dukhat, it's a gem!):

http://www.wixiban.com/images/roddenberry/11-16.jpg

We appear to be looking at three double-ender containers here, with the workbee "train" backbone still attached. If the containers were brought down via cargo transporter, the backbone probably wouldn't be there. So apparently we are to assume that a workbee with the cargo train can land on a Class M planet to deliver its load.

It need not have been a particularly soft landing - the aftmost container appears to have broken off and sits at an angle. Still, the ability to get down is a surprising one, as both the bees and the cargo clusters have the appearance of strict zero-gee hardware. Even the flimsy-looking shuttlecraft have more elements we can interpret as powerful lifting engines or other gravity-defying devices. And the workbee itself would apparently have been capable of lifting off again, as it's missing here (and if it did have that capacity, Kirk would surely have insisted on taking it away from Khan!).

...Perhaps the cargo train backbone was just a convenient place for fixing a big parachute? Those are still used in STXI, despite the existence of antigrav tech, so they might be a valid way of deploying Khan's huts, too. The less high tech he gets, the better.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 25 2011, 10:07 PM   #13
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

Timo wrote: View Post
Oh, and forgot about this...

Was the Khan encampment built on site or floated down from the original Enterprise via anti-grav?
Let's look at this one again (thanks, Dukhat, it's a gem!):

http://www.wixiban.com/images/roddenberry/11-16.jpg

We appear to be looking at three double-ender containers here, with the workbee "train" backbone still attached. If the containers were brought down via cargo transporter, the backbone probably wouldn't be there. So apparently we are to assume that a workbee with the cargo train can land on a Class M planet to deliver its load.

It need not have been a particularly soft landing - the aftmost container appears to have broken off and sits at an angle. Still, the ability to get down is a surprising one, as both the bees and the cargo clusters have the appearance of strict zero-gee hardware. Even the flimsy-looking shuttlecraft have more elements we can interpret as powerful lifting engines or other gravity-defying devices. And the workbee itself would apparently have been capable of lifting off again, as it's missing here (and if it did have that capacity, Kirk would surely have insisted on taking it away from Khan!).

...Perhaps the cargo train backbone was just a convenient place for fixing a big parachute? Those are still used in STXI, despite the existence of antigrav tech, so they might be a valid way of deploying Khan's huts, too. The less high tech he gets, the better.

Timo Saloniemi
Thanks Timo. As you well know, I'm pretty good at finding pics of obscure ships

However, I'm still trying to find a bigger pic, and so far no luck. I distinctly remember a photograph in Starlog showing the containers; although I originally thought it was the backdrop of a cast/crew photo, but the only pic like that has the Genesis cave in the background. Maybe someone has this trading card they could scan?
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28 2011, 11:26 PM   #14
SeerSGB
Admiral
 
SeerSGB's Avatar
 
Location: Out There...That Away
View SeerSGB's Twitter Profile
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

We know what Khans says: That all they had were the cargo pods, but it is possible that Kirk dropped a full pre-fab "starter kit" (tents, the 23rd version of a Quonset huts, basic tools) and when things went to shit the cargo pods were all that survived to provide protection.

As for a reason to go grab the Botany Bay: Brig. Having Khan on board is risky, he nearly took the ship and killed Kirk. He swings back, grabs the Botany, beams Khan and co over to the ship (after knocking out the engines) and impulse tows the ship back to Ceti Alpha V.
SeerSGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 28 2011, 11:55 PM   #15
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: How big were TWOK's "cargo bays" Khan spoke of?

I'm pretty sure the Botany Bay was not on Ceti Alpha V. If it was, don't you think everyone would be living in it instead of some small cargo containers?
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.