RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 137,884
Posts: 5,329,580
Members: 24,557
Currently online: 590
Newest member: Mgroup Video

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: Inquisition
By: Michelle on Jul 12

Cubify Star Trek 3DMe Mini Figurines
By: T'Bonz on Jul 11

Latest Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Jul 10

Seven of Nine Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

Pegg The Prankster
By: T'Bonz on Jul 9

More Trek Stars Join Unbelievable!!!!!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

Star Trek #35 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 8

New ThinkGeek Trek Apparel
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Star Trek Movie Prop Auction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7

Drexler: NX Engineering Room Construction
By: T'Bonz on Jul 7


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 7 2011, 06:00 AM   #16
Kelthaz
Rear Admiral
 
Kelthaz's Avatar
 
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

GSnail wrote: View Post
TOS is hard science fiction? I love TOS, don't get me wrong, but I'd say the later incarnations are so much harder. My view on TOS is that it is very goofy and charming, even though (and possibly because) the plots don't make sense. And fake accents.
TOS had this encountering strange new life and exploring the wonders of the universe thing going for it that the other series lacked. The other series used science fiction as a setting, while TOS fully embraced it as a concept.
__________________
"Who are you?! And how did you get in here?!"

"I'm the locksmith. And... I'm the locksmith."
Kelthaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 06:24 AM   #17
scotpens
Vice Admiral
 
scotpens's Avatar
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

Kelthaz wrote: View Post
TOS had this encountering strange new life and exploring the wonders of the universe thing going for it that the other series lacked. The other series used science fiction as a setting, while TOS fully embraced it as a concept.
Nonetheless, TOS was created — and sold — primarily as action-adventure with a science fiction background. That didn’t stop it from having some great stories, a lot of mediocre ones, and some real stinkeroos.
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?”
scotpens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 06:35 AM   #18
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Along the border of Talarian space
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

I always think that when DS9 started they didn't really know what to do, since the station doesn't go anywhere they have to deal with the repercussions of their decision rather than just flying off and never looking back. So for me the first couple of series are a little weak (this is most evident with Dax, who starts off as a Spock-esque character, all calm and logical, before they made her relish in her past lives and experiences), but once they find their feet DS9 is simply amazing!

As for VOY, I quite liked the first few seasons, up until it became Star Trek: The Adventures Of Seven. Once she came on I lost interest and actually missed most of season 7. Voyager had the chance to become a good series if they had watched the continuity, had a natural progression of episodes, where events for one impacted on another, and if they had actually stated;
JANEWAY: B'Elanna we'll need a shuttle for this mission, get to the shuttlecraft replicator and ready a type-8 please.

In my humble opinion, Voyager can't hold a candle to Deep Space 9. But that is just my preference.
__________________
Avatar: Captain Susanna Leijten, U.S.S. Silverfin NCC-4470, Border Service Third Cutter Squadron
Manip by: FltCpt. Bossco (STPMA)
Bry_Sinclair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 06:51 AM   #19
xortex
Commodore
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

Encino Vampire wrote: View Post
Kelthaz wrote: View Post
TOS had this encountering strange new life and exploring the wonders of the universe thing going for it that the other series lacked. The other series used science fiction as a setting, while TOS fully embraced it as a concept.
Nonetheless, TOS was created — and sold — primarily as action-adventure with a science fiction background. That didn’t stop it from having some great stories, a lot of mediocre ones, and some real stinkeroos.
Still it was plot driven. It didn't pretend to be a character oriented speculative fest like Vgr. It embraced and embodied true sci-fi where the others shyed away from it and were embarrased and ashamed of it for the sake of viewership I suspect. Of course. The producers didn't love sci-fi and that was reflected on screen. It was just a backdrop to them and was too silly and corny and hokey for their sophistocated take and approach to their more serious literature.
xortex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 07:32 AM   #20
GSnail
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Pancakes
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

xortex wrote: View Post
Encino Vampire wrote: View Post
Kelthaz wrote: View Post
TOS had this encountering strange new life and exploring the wonders of the universe thing going for it that the other series lacked. The other series used science fiction as a setting, while TOS fully embraced it as a concept.
Nonetheless, TOS was created — and sold — primarily as action-adventure with a science fiction background. That didn’t stop it from having some great stories, a lot of mediocre ones, and some real stinkeroos.
Still it was plot driven. It didn't pretend to be a character oriented speculative fest like Vgr. It embraced and embodied true sci-fi where the others shyed away from it and were embarrased and ashamed of it for the sake of viewership I suspect. Of course. The producers didn't love sci-fi and that was reflected on screen. It was just a backdrop to them and was too silly and corny and hokey for their sophistocated take and approach to their more serious literature.
But does that make it 'hard' sci fi? The way it was defined to me, hard sci fi is "science, science, science, science, teeeny bit of plot, science..." TOS had plots, not always realistic ones, but definitely entertaining nonetheless. What you are describing is simply the difference between well written sci-fi and 'badly' written sci-fi. In my opinion at least
GSnail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 08:04 AM   #21
CorporalClegg
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

What is this "hard sci fi" thing?
__________________
I haven't much to say.
CorporalClegg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 08:17 AM   #22
Gov Kodos
Vice Admiral
 
Gov Kodos's Avatar
 
Location: Gov Kodos Regretably far from Boston
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

CorporalClegg wrote: View Post
What is this "hard sci fi" thing?
Hard sci-fi should be extrapolating the effects of an aspect of science and technology on the world in which it exists. Gataca is a good hard sci-fi film on what could come with genetic engineering. I'd hardly call any Trek series hard sci-fi, though some episodes could be considered such. I wouldn't agree with the above assertion that hard sc-fi puts plot as of lesser importance to a story.
__________________
We are quicksilver, a fleeting shadow, a distant sound... our home has no boundaries beyond which we cannot pass. We live in music, in a flash of color... we live on the wind and in the sparkle of a star!' Endora on witches in Bewitched
Gov Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 08:18 AM   #23
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

cigol wrote: View Post
I watched Generations mostly as a curiosity after that Tuvok Flashback episode when he served on the Excelsior, btw. I was surprised to actually see Tim Russ on the Enterprise during what was that same situation! Talk about inconsistency..
Tuvok's (and Kang's) "Flashback" scenes were supposedly offscreen events during "ST VI: The Undiscovered Country", not "Generations".

"Generations" had nothing to do with "Flashback". Tim Russ played a human, not Tuvok.
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 09:48 AM   #24
You_Will_Fail
Fleet Captain
 
You_Will_Fail's Avatar
 
Location: Trill, Federation World and Proud
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

cigol wrote: View Post
Come on, you've never hada woman in your life like Janeway? Strong, warm, stern when need be, compassionate, overtly passionate about what she's doing?
Janeway was pretty warm and compassionate yes, but that doesn’t mean she was a realistic character or that consistent in anyway

cigol wrote: View Post
I admit, she did make a few seemingly out-of-character decisions, but Chakotay called her out almost every time and that is when they butted heads the worst.
In my opinion, Janeway never made an out of character decision because she didn't really have any solid character traits. She just flailed about wildy during all 7 seasons. "We must stick to regulations", "this is no time for regulations", "Violence is not the answer", "Let's blow shit up to get our way out of this mess".
Janeway was however the writer wanted her to be for that week, the writers seemingly weren't that interested in developing Janeway the character or having any kind of arc.

cigol wrote: View Post
After Caretaker, Janeway knew she made the right decision by destroying his array. But as the series progressed, she began to question that decision, and she obviously struggled with it. She also relaxed her position on Starfleet regulations and the way she conducts herself with the crew.
We see Janeway regret blowing up the array for one episode in "Night". She suddenly regrets blowing up the Array five years after she does it and then that’s all wrapped up and finished after that episode.
There's no sign or suggestion that she really regretted it before that point. The writers clearly ignored the old maxim of "show don't tell here" and tried to superimpose a depth to her character by trying to convince us that she'd actually been struggling with it for 5 years, well I certainly didn't see it!

I also didn't see much relaxation of Starfleet protocols compared to what should have happened. There should have been a mixing of Maquis and Starfleet tactics and beliefs but there really wasn't any of that. Chakotay eventually became her lapdog, even apologizing to her for questioning her torture/"i will kill you" technique in Equinox Pt 2.

cigol wrote: View Post
I think the only characters in Voyager that weren't exactly "fleshed out" were Harry Kim and Chakotay (especially later on in the series).
Voyager couldn't even flesh out all their characters when there were only like 8 of them, compared to something like 20 with DS9. That's a pretty sad indictment of the writers attention to character. When Ronald D. Moore asked the showrunners about B'Ellana when he was developing "Barge of the Dead", they simply told him that they'd given up on her character long ago.
And I don't really believe Tom or Janeway were particularly real characters. I've already covered Janeway, but we're supposed to believe Tom was a bad boy turned good. Well if Tom was meant to be a "bad boy" any time earlier in the series, the Federation is even more pathetic than we thought.
Regarding Seven of Nine, we saw some character development yes...mostly going into season 7. But most of her episodes had her finding out about her humanity until she was reset back to normal the following week so she could find out exactly the same thing but in a different way.
B'Ellana was a somewhat similar case, they kept giving her episodes about her anger and struggle with being Klingon. But there was a disconnect from the revelations of those mostly well written episodes and the B'Ellana we saw the rest of the time. She'd go from having a life changing experience in "Barge of the Dead" to never mentioning it again or changing her behaviour.

cigol wrote: View Post
But that doesn't mean there wasn't continuity! Remember how Kes experienced the Year of Hell when she was going back in time? The next season, the Year of Hell happened. Remember when they entered Borg Space? the Borg were a constant threat during that time.
Well I don't remember them entering Borg space and the Borg being a constant threat, I seem to remember Kes clearing them of it in "The Gift". I do however remember the beginning of “Dark Frontier” when Janeway said they’d apparently added on thousands of lightyears to their journey by avoiding the Borg. When did we ever see that happen? At that point in the series, we thought they were nowhere near the Borg, but they wanted a Borg episode so now suddenly the Voyager crew were inexplicably surrounded by them.
Before I address the lack of general continuity, I'll just say that wasn't the only problem. As I said before, the characters didn't seem real in how they interacted each week. Voyager was made specifically to be watched out of sequence in syndication, so we didn't get the organic kind of week-week progression of characters that we got in DS9.

Regarding the lack of continuity in general, it’s funny that you mentioned how villains from earlier seasons couldn't show up, but that's exactly what happened so big was the showrunner's lack of attention to continuity (or just not caring).
The Hirogen and the Malon show up in "Flesh and Blood" and "Juggernaut" respectively over 25,000 lightyears after we saw them. The Kazon stick around forever considering their apparently inferior technology. The Talaxians in “Homestead” are to be found something like 40,000 lightyears from their homeworld.

Besides that, there are really a million things that bother me continuity wise that took me away from believing the show and snapped me back to reality. The neverending supply of shuttles, the fluctuating crew complement, the neverending torpedo supply, the holodecks being run all the time despite apparently having to conserve energy and let's not forget the ship magically fixing itself between episodes no matter how huge the damage. I mean, you say "every show has inconsistencies" but when your show is about a ship stranded far from home, you shouldn't really be making the kind of mistakes Voyager did.

cigol wrote: View Post
I guess I could do this all day, so I'll just stop
To be honest, I doubt you could list story arcs in Voyager for more than a minute. Once Michael Piller left, the show went into standalone episode overdrive. The network stopped them from doing a year long "Year of Hell" arc and after that they seemed totally resigned to limiting any long stories to two-parters only.

Basically all of my problems with Voyager were outlined by Ronald D. Moore after he quit the writing staff at Voyager in this interview
http://www.lcarscom.net/rdm1000118.htm
It’s a fantastic read and outlines completely how wasted the concept became
I think what you're doing is giving everything far more credit than its due. The story of what we actually saw ON SCREEN on Voyager is being expanded in your mind which a lot of people do. For example:

cigol wrote: View Post
It took a long time for the crews to actually work together and respect eachother.
It did? Where did we see that? The whole Maqui situation was really brushed under the rug very early on. To have the Maqui all wearing Starfleet uniforms by the end of the pilot and only once consider using any kind of Maqui tactics in the entire show was fairly absurd (referring to "Alliances").
You're assuming that it took a long time for them to work together and respect eachother because it makes sense, but the writers didn't give us that or show us.

In conclusion, there was a time that I was really pissed off from Voyager. I watched it after DS9 and the complete disregard for continuity or any attempt to make the show a realistic depiction of a single ship alone and away from home really pissed me off.
Now I've learned to accept its flaws and simply accept it as a show that gives me more of what I love - science fiction stories in a Star Trek setting. It has a lot of good writing as long as one doesn't take a step back and look at the big picture and mostly I'm happy to do that. It just annoys me a bit when people try to give certain things more credit than their due- such as claiming Janeway was some kind of "real" character when its obvious upon closer inspection that she just wasn't written consistently at all.

Overall I kind of know what you mean by saying the Voyager characters were *better* than the DS9 ones. But there's a difference between being better/more likable and being more developed.

Last edited by You_Will_Fail; October 7 2011 at 10:03 AM.
You_Will_Fail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 12:05 PM   #25
captcalhoun
Admiral
 
Location: everywhere
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

i'll give you one reason why Voyager was crap.

timed detonators.

SERIOUSLY! No one thought to put a fucking timed detonator on the tricobalt device and use the array to get home and then it blows up? what the fuck, man? and Tuvok was suppsoed to be some brilliant tactical genius and he can't think of putting a timer on there?

if they were bent on the Array being destroyed and Voyager being stranded, they should've just had it get blown up during the battle with the Kazon, or like, the Caretaker died and it didn't work any more or something...

don't get me, wrong, I know other shows did stupid things too, but... DAMN...

(i still watched all 7 years, but it still bugged me)
captcalhoun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 12:12 PM   #26
Anika Hanson
Captain
 
Anika Hanson's Avatar
 
Location: Thallon
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

I love all the star trek series'. The only one I like rather than love is Enterprise, as it just feels un- star trek like to me. I think one if the great things about star trek apart from the concept and the stories are the characters. I have favourites from every series but in general I like all the characters. I can understand why TNG may seem dated to some but for me TNG and TOS really sum up the essence of star trek.
__________________
Assimilate this!
Anika Hanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 04:03 PM   #27
TheGodBen
Rear Admiral
 
TheGodBen's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

cigol wrote: View Post
DS9 is great! I really like it. Sisko is awesome, and I really like O'Brien, Odo, and Quark. I am halfway through season 3, but something just doesn't sit well with me.

For a show that is almost universally touted for having really fleshed-out characters, they just don't seem to hold a candle to the Voyager crew. I mean, Sisko is great, and he is probably my favorite character in DS9, but he just doesn't seem to be as well-rounded as Janeway was.
As a Niner, I'll say something unexpected and agree with you, by mid-season 3 Sisko isn't a well fleshed out character. During the first two and a half years, the writers didn't seem to get a grasp on that character except in a handful of episodes, and it's something that a lot of fans mention. However, after Past Tense the writers began to find Sisko's voice and he becomes far more interesting. His work, personal and spiritual lives begin to play a larger role in the show starting around that point and he becomes a very interesting man.

Even Kira doesn't really feel real to me that often, although her performance in "Duet" (Season 1) was incredible.
I can't agree on this point. Kira was the stand-out character of the first season, and probably the second too. Some people don't like her and think that she was too "whiny", but those people all deserve to be sent to work in Cardassian labour camps, in my humble opinion.

Not to mention Jake, Nog, Rom, and most of the Bajoran visitors that frequently visit the station. Almost everyone feels way too one-dimensional.
I don't want to spoil anything for you, but Nog has one of the most impressive character arcs in the entire Star Trek franchise. He may come across as one-dimensional if you're not paying attention, but even back in the first season there were signs of depth to his character, such as learning to read in The Nagus. You can barely imagine the journey that Nog goes on over the course of the show, he is a brilliant character.

cigol wrote: View Post
Come on, you've never had a woman in your life like Janeway? Strong, warm, stern when need be, compassionate, overtly passionate about what she's doing?
Janeway is an odd character for me. Jeri Taylor seems to have had a vision for the character that reads quite similar to what you describe, but the other writers would often stray away from it and write a different character altogether, something that was exacerbated once Taylor left the show in season 5. Any consistency that the character had seems to have come more from Kate Mulgrew than the writers themselves. Kate comes across as a very likeable and charismatic person in real life, and that spills over into the Janeway character, it's just a pity that she was often written in a way that didn't suit the character.

But that doesn't mean there wasn't continuity! Remember how Kes experienced the Year of Hell when she was going back in time? The next season, the Year of Hell happened.
No it didn't.

Actually, the Year of Hell was supposed to a a year-long arc that lasted throughout the forth season. The Krenim were supposed to pop up every few episodes, the ship was supposed to get damaged and stay damaged, crewmembers would be injured and need to recover... but Paramount wanted the show to remain episodic and TNG-like, so it never happened. Instead, Braga was forced to re-write his story as a two-parter with a reset button on the end so that the whole thing never happened.

DS9 wasn't perfect, but it did have story-arcs lasting multiple seasons, most notably the war arc. They would purposefully end episodes ambiguously so that they could revisit the plot later. There were shocking twists that were only possible because they had spent time developing the universe. These were all things that Voyager either didn't do or never did to the same extent as DS9.

Now, if you like lighter episodic stories, that's fine, plenty people do. Personally, I prefer the direction that DS9 went. So there's nothing wrong with you if you prefer Voyager, it just means that you're not cool, like me.
__________________
...so many different suns...
TheGodBen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 06:14 PM   #28
Relayer1
Commodore
 
Relayer1's Avatar
 
Location: The Black Country, England
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

You_Will_Fail wrote: View Post

Basically all of my problems with Voyager were outlined by Ronald D. Moore after he quit the writing staff at Voyager in this interview
http://www.lcarscom.net/rdm1000118.htm
It’s a fantastic read and outlines completely how wasted the concept became
Wow - that's pretty much nailed everything that was so wrong with Voyager : it was damning. Ron has been a bit of a hero to me for years, and he has just gone up in my estimation.

The only thing I'd disagree with him on is the strength of the cast. I disliked Janeway, Tuvok and Neelix from the outset and unlike DS9 when, for instance, Sisko and Odo really grew on me, these didn't. Well, Neelix got a little better. The problems were probably as much the fault of the writing as the casting though.

I managed to watch and even enjoy Voyager after a fashion, as a halfway mindless bad guy of the week sci-fi show, but it could have been and should have been much, much more.

I'd like every Trek fan to read that interview, especially Voyager fans...
__________________
Soon oh soon the light, Pass within and soothe this endless night, And wait here for you, Our reason to be here...
Relayer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 06:29 PM   #29
xortex
Commodore
 
Location: Staten Island, NY
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

That was Daffy Duck and the treasure of Ali Baba. Hasson chop! 'It's mine.. mine..all mine!..' My respect for him is below sea level. Like he was the only one there. Wow.
Menosky and Braga squashed him like a bug.
xortex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 7 2011, 08:38 PM   #30
Temis the Vorta
Fleet Admiral
 
Temis the Vorta's Avatar
 
Location: Tatoinne
Re: Is there something wrong with me?

VOY's strength is it actors (great cast) which is why you might be responding to the characters. DS9's best characters were in the recurring cast - Garak, Dukat, Weyoun, Damar, Winn, etc. Keep going, even Nog turns into a fascinating character.

DS9 got around Star Trek's way of squelching character growth among the main cast by focusing on developing the non-main cast. Of the main's, Kira does undergo growth, but like Nog, it doesn't become obvious unless you stick with the show.

The other thing about DS9 that the other series don't have is the development of plotlines and themes.
Temis the Vorta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.