RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,062
Posts: 5,397,609
Members: 24,735
Currently online: 441
Newest member: phurren

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Retro Watches
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

New DS9 eBook To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Trek Ice Cube Maker and Shot Glasses
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

City on the Edge of Forever #3 Preview
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

TV Alert: Shatner TNG Documentary
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Forbes Cast In Powers
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22

Dorn To Voice Firefly Character
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22

No ALS Ice Bucket For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Aug 22


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 22 2011, 05:58 PM   #1
the_shark
Ensign
 
The Prime Directive

Hi, I am new to the forum and have a query in regards to the Prime Directive and the breaching of it.

I am currently writing a story, within which a Commander breaches the Prime Directive when rescuing her Captain from kidnappers.

She breaches the Prime Directive by allowing one side of a warring planet gain an advantage and subsequently kill the leader of the other side, she does this knowingly and trading letting them gain access to this area in exchange for information on how to rescue her Captain.

Obviously this person needs to be Court-Martialled but what would you expect to happen to her, demotion to Luitenant Commander or just Luitenant or something more severe?

Thank you and hellllloooooo!
the_shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 06:08 PM   #2
Scrambo
Lieutenant Commander
 
Scrambo's Avatar
 
Location: In the Biochemistry Lab
View Scrambo's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

Hello

I would say look at the amount of times Characters from the Tv show breach the prime directive. I would imagine it all depends on the outcome of your story.

Prob not much help. Otherwise it depends on how severe a breach it is seen.. possibly a court martial would indeed be the correct course of action. Be interesting to see other people opinions
Scrambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 06:32 PM   #3
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

Tough call. Depends on if there are any extenuating circumstances beyond the rescuing of the Captain.

Is it a technologically less advanced culture?

Maybe the TNG episode Too Short a Season might help.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 06:45 PM   #4
the_shark
Ensign
 
Re: The Prime Directive

BillJ wrote: View Post
Tough call. Depends on if there are any extenuating circumstances beyond the rescuing of the Captain.

Is it a technologically less advanced culture?
Yes the culture is technologically less advanced - the captain and a few more crew. Basically if the Commander had been less paniced about being in command of the ship for the first time, it wouldn't have happened.

She struck a deal with the leader of the A group (lets say B group has captured the captain) to use some of their unique technology to get to where the captain is and in return the Commander would open the area and let group A in Group B's domain, like a surprise attack! and of course Group A then kills a good chunk of Group B.

I can't decide wether the Commander will be demoted, moved to another ship effectively ending their run on the ship in question and bringing in a new Commander or being sent to a detention camp with the same result as above.

I currently do not have an ending to my story
the_shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 06:57 PM   #5
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

I'd have to imagine that conspiring with one leader to assassinate another leader would probably be frowned upon by Starfleet. What was the mission to begin with? Simple exploration? Did these people know about starfaring civilizations prior to your gang showing up on the scene? Did the Captain violate the Prime Directive to begin with by not taking proper precautions to cover their identities?

Definitely going to be trouble for the officer. But I imagine that intent and the ramifications of the violation will play heavily in the punishment.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:01 PM   #6
Scrambo
Lieutenant Commander
 
Scrambo's Avatar
 
Location: In the Biochemistry Lab
View Scrambo's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

Ah i guess you could argue that the commander did not forsee that group A would kill group B's leader and had agreed to the deal with the idea that Group A would possibly "capture" Group B's leader.

Has another albeit at this time unknown alien species interferred with the progression of Group B and helped in some way to enable the commander to have to breach the prime directive as seen in TOS "A Private Little War" but with klingons?

If this is the case then i guess the commander will not need a court martial and would have been seen to be acting within regulations as another species has interferred with the planets' native race......
Scrambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:01 PM   #7
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

Plus, is this the 23rd or the 24th century? That will play heavily on how the violation is viewed.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:15 PM   #8
Mr Silver
Rear Admiral
 
Location: UK
Re: The Prime Directive

If someone who is bound by the prime directive, knowingly does something that will greatly affect a civilisation, then the prime directive is breached.

The prime directive is also open to intepretation. If you look at TNG's "Two Short A Season", Mark Jameson supplied both sides in a war with the same amount of weapons, figuring that he had given both sides equal dominance. However, by knowingly supplying a less technologically advanced civilisation with starfleet weapons, he had in fact interfered with their society and caused a major change in the tactics of a war.

So you could argue that your commander used her interpretation of the prime directive to quickly end a conflict whilst saving her captain. In the long term saving many lives. However morally questionable this may be, it certainly gives you an idea of the kind of motivation a starfleet officer may use to justify a breach of the prime directive.
Mr Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:16 PM   #9
T'Girl
Vice Admiral
 
T'Girl's Avatar
 
Re: The Prime Directive

In the episode Tomorrow is Yesterday, Captain Kirk was considering "disappearing" a man from the twentieth century. One of the factors was that he didn't immediately seem to have contributes significantly to his society.

If the political leader's or military leader's death ultimately made little difference, someone with in their own warring faction simply took their place and the other side didn't win the war from this one event, then the damage the Commander caused to the planet's society might not have been significant. The leader's "disappearance" would have been of no more importance that Captain Christopher's.

If the Commander acted with malice, say she personally didn't like the leader (was he political or military? Doesn't really matter, just curious.), then her being a contributing cause of his death takes on a different light. Conspiracy to commit murder.

Did the commander have other options to obtain her Captain's release, but she choose this one because it also would give the Commander to personal satisfaction of the leader's death?

There's also the apparent fact the Starfleet, certainly in the TOS era, has a creed of "no man left behind." The Commander's standing orders would include rescuing superior officers.

It's relevant if this all happen during TOS or TNG time periods. During TOS, the Prime Directive was shaped from soft clay. During TNG and later, it was more craved in granite.

There might not be a formal courts martial, a court of inquiry might suffice.
T'Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:20 PM   #10
Mr Silver
Rear Admiral
 
Location: UK
Re: The Prime Directive

Janeway broke the prime directive too. She reasoned that Species 8472 would be a real threat to the entire Galaxy once the Borg were out of the way and therefore she gave the Borg an advantage in exchange for safe passage.

If the prime directive was upheld, Janeway would have turned back and left them to it.
Mr Silver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 07:45 PM   #11
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The Prime Directive

Captain M wrote: View Post
Janeway broke the prime directive too. She reasoned that Species 8472 would be a real threat to the entire Galaxy once the Borg were out of the way and therefore she gave the Borg an advantage in exchange for safe passage.

If the prime directive was upheld, Janeway would have turned back and left them to it.
Not sure that it would've been seen as a Prime Directive violation as the Federation, as well as all the worlds between it and the Delta Quadrant, had a stake in the outcome.
__________________
"I tell you what you all need, you need to take a thirteenth step, down off your high horse." - Hank Hill, King of the Hill
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 08:31 PM   #12
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: The Prime Directive

All the captains with the exceptions of Sisko and Archer broke the Prime Directive with no consequences. And really, that's only because Sisko was hardly ever in any situations where the Prime Directive applied, though the whole Emissary thing was cutting things close. And there was no Prime Directive in Archer's time.

Hell, wasn't said in The Drumhead that Picard ahd the most Prime Directive violations for captains currently serving?

Bottom line: there are no consequences for violating the Prime Directive. Unless you're the Crazy Evil Captain/Admiral of the Week.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 09:35 PM   #13
the_shark
Ensign
 
Re: The Prime Directive

The idea is set within the beginning of the 25th century
the_shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 10:05 PM   #14
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: The Prime Directive

Well the Prime Directive of the late 24th century, seemed to indicate you could not violate it in order save starfleet personal lives or the ship. Though there does appear to be some scope for correcting a previous violation of the Prime Directive.

Though what sort of unique technology to they have, that prevents the ship from simple beaming up the Captain,. Had the civilisation once been warp capabale and gave it up at some point in the past.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 22 2011, 11:50 PM   #15
fireinthedust
Cadet
 
Re: The Prime Directive

That is a HUGE violation of the prime directive.

1) She took sides in a war
2) Her actions resulted in the death of a living being
3) That living being was the leader of a large group in a war time situation
4) her actions involved a political shift.


Now, if the leader was a sonofagun bad guy, I could see it sliding by.

a) How did her crew get captured?
b) How affected by knowledge of the Federation was this culture? Ie: are they a technological civilization or a bunch of barbarians who now worship the ship?
c) Is the point of the novel her getting in trouble?

Obviously there are situational things. If you want to take the novel in the direction of a court scene, then focus on the parts where her actions devastated the other culture. Group B is massacred, Group A is really brutal about it, and the Captain is not pleased. Group B isn't really as bad as they were described by A, and A does all the stuff that B was said to have done.

If you want this to be just a blip, ignore the process.

HOWEVER: I do have to ask: if they're not as technologically powerful as the ship, how come the Commander doesn't just beam her Captain and crew back using the transporter? It's not like they have shields to block them, right? Unless the transporters were destroyed when the Captain was captured...

But yeah, if the crew was being ransomed, she's got a replicator and other resources to trade. ie: trade whatever is needed, get the crew back, then beam back all the gear that was traded for. Done.
fireinthedust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
prime directive, story

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.