|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#976 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: NJ, USA
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Its a great concept, not quite lived up to by the execution. For one Flint starts off ok, but winds up getting into a macho clash of wills with Kirk. I find this hard to believe for a man with such experience. Kirk also seems to fall in love rather easily in season 3...it might have been better if they simply wrote Kirk as a man who wanted to "save" Rayna from the life she was living. What's worse, Rayna is interesting up until an emotional breakdown that she simply couldn't handle! Emotion does her in because of course, AI can never handle such things. Despite that, Rayna is one of the more advanced androids in TOS. Much of this can be forgiven, the episode is rather leisurely paced, but it seems very appropriate and works throughout. There is some very good writing here. The episode was written by Jerome Bixby, who later went on to adapt it once again into the excellent, award winning: "Man From Earth" movie screenplay. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Man_From_Earth Note must be made of a staggeringly good matte by Max Gabl of Flint's home in the TOS-R version, which adds fine little touches, like a rocket and observatory in giving TOS's locales some variety. ![]() The original was pretty darn good too: ![]() As an aside...isn't it interesting to see a helper robot for Flint? Seems logical that such hovering, flitting machines would exist by this time, helping with everything from science missions to getting Kirk's shoes. Its efficiency is obvious, it even does a better job than Spock at some tasks. Episode: **** stars I have one central impression of this episode, it actually rings true...despite all the black and white images we may have of good and evil, quite often they really do use the same methods...there are lots of shades of gray which people are not ready to admit. The episode could have had uber hero Kirk, pacifist Surak, idealized Lincoln and near-pacifist Spock really come off as straight-laced boy scouts. The historical characters give a rare glimpse into the history of the Earth and some other high profile planets. There is a rare attempt to make a truly alien being. Overall, it lacks the necessary cohesion and intensity to be a great episode, but its a step above the usual 3rd season episode. **** stars
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey |
|
|
|
|
|
#977 | |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
#978 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Of course, that’s the painting of the Rigel fortress recycled from “The Cage.” You knew that, right?
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|
|
|
|
|
#979 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Case in point: “All Our Yesterdays” *** Kirk, Spock and McCoy finds themselves trapped in a planet's distant past shortly before the planet's sun is to go nova. There are some good moments in this, most particularly I like how it's McCoy that puts everything together before Spock does. I do find it interesting that Sarpeidon's science has mastered time travel, but not space travel. Of course we don't know the culture or its history and there may well be a reason why they never developed space travel. Or perhaps once they had and later turned their back on it. At any rate it's an interesting idea that an entire planet's population escapes the destruction of their world by retreating into the past. It certainly sets up an interesting situation for our heroes who are inadvertently transported into that past. The idea that the Atavachron "prepares" you for a past era sounds kind of dodgy to me. Evolution doesn't really work that way. Except for acquired knowledge there really isn't any physiological difference between contemporary humans and our ancestors. In extent of that there is no reason for Spock to revert to the behaviour of his distant ancestors...except that it makes for drama. Mr Atoz has replicas as assistants. Of course, the term clone wasn't yet in widespread use. It's also interesting that in TOS' time they can time when a star will go nova practically to the minute, and without any technobabble. ![]() Overall it's an okay episode. I must say I rather like that shot of the Enterprise flyby as the star goes nova.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#980 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
I don't think it's being in the past that affects Spock so much as the environment. Probably a very primal survival instinct kicked in when he thought he was trapped in an ice age.
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#981 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
||
|
|
|
|
#982 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
Location: NJ, USA
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
RAMA
__________________
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”—Stephen R. Covey |
||
|
|
|
|
#983 | |||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|||
|
|
|
|
#984 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Kirk finds himself trapped in the body of a former lover. Even the description of this episode sounds loopy. And like some previous episodes there is a potentially interesting story to be told here, but it's marred by sloppy thinking.Watching this and seeing "Kirk's" erratic behaviour when inhabited by the persona of Janice Lester I can't help think of the second season episode "Obsession." There McCoy and Spock seemed much more assured of challenging the Captain's authority when his behaviour was far less extreme than seen here. And for me this really undermines how far Lester/Kirk is allowed to go before things get really messy. I also find it wholly ludicrous that McCoy's tests show nothing psychologically wrong when Lester/Kirk's blatant behaviour is out there for anyone to see. Shatner does an interesting job of portraying his body possessed by the erratic Janice Lester. He's comes across as soo self-conscious and affected. His body language as well as mannerisms and speech are so different from the familiar Kirk's. Sandra Smith also does a respectable job of portraying Kirk trapped in Lester's body with just the right touches of speech patterns and mannerisms. Another bit of nonsense in my opinion is Lester/Kirk's reference to "months of preparation" to take over the real Kirk's position. It takes years for someone to be ready to command a starship yet Lester has prepared for only months??? It's really just another bit of evidence showing that Janice Lester is beyond being just bitter and definately crossed over into mentally unstable. Or in more plain language she's fucking crazy. ![]() I also think it's pretty damned clear that Lester left Starfleet and that command wasn't possible for her because even way back then she just didn't have the temperament for it. Indeed Kirk/Lester actually states she wasn't suited for command because of lack of training and temperament. It has nothing to do with women not being able to command. Unstable women (or men) is another thing entirely. While it's interesting to watch Shatner's performance I also found it unsettling even while understanding it was supposed to be. It's just so out there. But ultimately it taints the rest of the story for me.This is TOS' last episode production wise as well as broadcast wise. Pity it couldn't have gone out on a better note. Or to quote Kirk's last line: "If only..."
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#985 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
__________________
Boobies are evil!!! |
|
|
|
|
#986 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Season 1 scored 127 of 145 = 87.5% = an episode average of 4.37 of 5. Season 2 scored 97 of 130 = 74.6% = an episode average of 3.73 of 5. Season 3 scored 79 of 120 = 65.8% = an episode average of 3.29 of 5. ***** Excellent = 4 episodes = 16.6% “Elaan Of Troyius” “The Enterprise Incident” “Is There In Truth No Beauty?” “The Tholian Web” **** Good = 8 episodes = 33.3% “Spectre Of The Gun” “The Empath” “Day Of The Dove” “Plato’s Stepchildren” “That Which Survives” “The Cloud Minders” “The Way To Eden” “Requiem For Methuselah” *** Fair = 6 episodes = 25% “The Paradise Syndrome” “For The World Is Hollow And I Have Touched The Sky” “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield” “The Lights Of Zetar” “The Savage Curtain” “All Our Yesterdays” ** Poor = 3 episodes = 12.5% “Spock’s Brain” “The Mark Of Gideon” “Turnabout Intruder” * Bad = 3 episodes = 12.5% “And The Children Shall Lead” “Wink Of An Eye” “Whom Gods Destroy” Breakdown by Season Good to Excellent - Season 3 slips about ten percent from Season 2. But even so half of its episodes are respectable and can stand with the better episodes of the previous two seasons. Season 1 = 82.7% (24 episodes) Season 2 = 61.5% (16 episodes) Season 3 = 50% (12 episodes) Fair - Interestingly Season 3 stays pretty close to same as Season 2 in terms of watchable episodes. Season 1 = 17.2% (5 episodes) Season 2 = 26.9% (7 episodes) Season 3 = 25% (6 episodes) Poor to Bad - Here is the swing. What Season 3 lost in top tier episodes it dropped to disappointing efforts. Season 1 = 0% (0 episodes) Season 2 = 11.5% (3 episodes) Season 3 = 25% (6 episodes) In the end Season 3 isn't as bad as what seems to be the generally held perspective. At least half of the episodes are respectable and if you include the watchable ones as well that's three quarters of the season is at least acceptable. That is still a damned good batting average. And while I don't have the hard numbers compared yet no TNG season did much better than that. It's also interesting that Season 3's budget constraints didn't really make itself apparent as often as might be believed. Even under budgetary constraints quite a few episodes still put on a good show. And there was sufficiently abundant creativity and resourcefulness apparent throughout much of the season. Where Season 3 fell down was in terms of careless thinking and careless execution. Things went south when ideas weren't thought through enough and the general execution felt rushed just to get the show in the can. A little more attention and overall polish could have gone a long way. Series Breakdown: Good to Excellent = 65.8% (52 episodes) Fair = 22.7% (18 episodes) Poor to Bad = 11.3% (9 episodes) TOS certainly doesn't follow the "one third" results of my TNG revisit where I found about one third of the episodes Good-Excellent, one third Fair and one third Poor-Bad. For TOS I find nearly two thirds of the series to be Good-Excellent, a bit less than a quarter of it Fair and a little more than a tenth of it to be Poor-Bad.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
#987 |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Good to Excellent - TNG never really gets close to TOS in terms of batting average here. TNG Season 1 = 16% (4 episodes) TNG Season 2 = 40.9% (9 episodes) TNG Season 3 = 42.3% (11 episodes) TNG Season 4 = 42.3% (11 episodes) TNG Season 5 = 34.6% (9 episodes) TNG Season 6 = 30.7% (8 episodes) TNG Season 7 = 15.3% (4 episodes) TOS Season 1 = 82.7% (24 episodes) TOS Season 2 = 61.5% (16 episodes) TOS Season 3 = 50% (12 episodes) Fair - TNG picks up here where it loses in the better ratings. Whether that's win or lose is a matter of perspective. The closest equivalent is TNG's Season 4 with TOS' Seasons 2 and 3. In terms of numbers in any given season then it's pretty damned close. TNG Season 1 = 36% (9 episodes) TNG Season 2 = 22.7% (5 episodes) TNG Season 3 = 30.7% (8 episodes) TNG Season 4 = 26.9% (7 episodes) TNG Season 5 = 34.6% (9 episodes) TNG Season 6 = 34.6% (9 episodes) TNG Season 7 = 34.6% (9 episodes) TOS Season 1 = 17.2% (5 episodes) TOS Season 2 = 26.9% (7 episodes) TOS Season 3 = 25% (6 episodes) Poor to Bad - The closest comparison is TNG's Season 3 with TOS' Season 3, but throughout the rest TNG has a poorer batting average. TNG Season 1 = 48% (12 episodes) TNG Season 2 = 36.3% (8 episodes) TNG Season 3 = 26.9% (7 episodes) TNG Season 4 = 30.7% (8 episodes) TNG Season 5 = 30.7% (8 episodes) TNG Season 6 = 34.6% (9 episodes) TNG Season 7 = 50% (13 episodes) TOS Season 1 = 0% (0 episodes) TOS Season 2 = 11.5% (3 episodes) TOS Season 3 = 25% (6 episodes Of course, one can argue that TNG ran longer than TOS and so the odds for more Fair-Poor-Bad episodes was likely greater. But even if you compare only the first three or four seasons of TNG with TOS then TOS still has a better batting average. Series comparisons: Good to Excellent - TNG produced more than twice as many episodes as TOS and yet the difference in the number of quality episodes is negligible. TNG = 31.4% (56 episodes) TOS = 65.8% (52 episodes) Fair - With a longer production run it's understandable TNG would have greater odds for putting out more average episodes. TNG = 31.4% (56 episodes) TOS = 22.7% (18 episodes) Poor to Bad - TNG had more than twice as many episodes and more than three times as many disappointments. TNG = 37% (66 episodes) TOS = 11.3% (9 episodes) After all is said and done TOS was/is a dynamic and incredibly creative series. At times it faltered, but overall it accomplished pretty much everything it set out to do. And it did it with unapologetic style. It's easy to see how much of it became so iconic and how its better efforts can easily stand with the best SF ever put on television. Next stop: TAS
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 Last edited by Warped9; June 17 2011 at 06:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#988 | |
|
Admiral
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
A supernova is a one time event (and, yes, a white dwarf could eventually supernova), but it's usually relegated to large stars exceeding a certain mass I believe. Such stars are highly unlikely to have a habitable planet and one with an advanced civilization evolving upon it since the star's life is so short lived. Our own sun will not supernova because it is too small (thankfully). But eventually it will swell into a red giant as it nears the end of its life about five billion years from now. At that time it could conceivably swell beyond Earth's orbit and consume the planet. Of course, long before that the Earth will have been scorched to a burnt, and lifeless cinder. The other question raised is if Federation science can time a sun going "nova" almost to the minute then how long had they known that Sarpeidon's sun would flash? It's possible they had only recently discovered this because there is no mention of any potential plan to inform the planet's population or to help evacuate them. And that is certainly something the Enterprise couldn't do alone. My impression of some of the unspoken backstory here is: - the Federation knew of Sarpeidon's existence and the civilization there. Later long range scans indicate the star will go nova. - Sarpeidon's people did not have any evidence of space travel and it was ignorant of life on other worlds beyond their own. - the Enterprise perhaps was meant to observe the nova from a distance even while powerless to aid any of the population, by context of practicality and perhaps also because of the Prime Directive. If the Prime Directive is invoked here then it's an obvious case of letting an entire civilization die rather than allowing any intervention to try to save some portion of the population. Of course, it could also be a matter of practicality in that it's only recently learned the star will nova and there simply isn't time to enact any sort of evacuation plan. - the Enterprise arrives in the area for its observation of the event and long range scans detect no remaining life on the planet or at least intelligent life. And then that's where the episode picks up.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
#989 |
|
Admiral
Location: I said out, dammit!
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
Apart from Kirk's whirlwind romance I also hate that they made Flint almost EVERY notable genius from human history! What, he was the only one ever born who could be smart and creative!? They could have made him just one or two notable men and still made the point.I saw Louise Sorrel at Chiller a few years ago and she has aged quite gracefully, and was still quite lovely.
__________________
My kitbashes: http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbash/trekpage.html My Kitbash Wallpapers: http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...allpapers.html My kitbash calendar: http://inpayne.com/calendar/kbcalendar2013.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#990 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Revisiting Star Trek TOS/TAS...
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















It takes years for someone to be ready to command a starship yet Lester has prepared for only months??? It's really just another bit of evidence showing that Janice Lester is beyond being just bitter and definately crossed over into mentally unstable. Or in more plain language she's fucking crazy. 




